update on the iacs common structural rules for tankers bulk carriers l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Update on the IACS Common Structural Rules for Tankers & Bulk Carriers PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Update on the IACS Common Structural Rules for Tankers & Bulk Carriers

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 40

Update on the IACS Common Structural Rules for Tankers & Bulk Carriers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 367 Views
  • Uploaded on

Update on the IACS Common Structural Rules for Tankers & Bulk Carriers. Rune Torhaug (DNV) Dr. Chon (KR), Åge Bøe (DNV). Beijing, October 31st. 2005. Preview. IACS CSR Schedule and Scope. Harmonization Progress. Rule Update on JTP. Rule Update on JBP. Discussion.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Update on the IACS Common Structural Rules for Tankers & Bulk Carriers' - yosef


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
update on the iacs common structural rules for tankers bulk carriers

Update on the IACS Common Structural Rulesfor Tankers & Bulk Carriers

Rune Torhaug (DNV)

Dr. Chon (KR), Åge Bøe (DNV)

Beijing, October 31st. 2005

preview
Preview

IACS CSR Schedule and Scope

Harmonization Progress

Rule Update on JTP

Rule Update on JBP

Discussion

slide3

IACS CSR Schedule and Scope

Harmonization Progress

Rule Update on JTP

Rule Update on JBP

Discussion

scope of rule developments
Scope of Rule Developments
  • JTP : Joint Tanker Project
    • LRS, ABS & DNV
    • Complete Set of Structural Rules for Double Hull Oil Tankers
    • Length greater than or equal to 150m
  • JBP : Joint Bulker Project
    • BV, CCS, GL, KR, NK, RINA & RS
    • Complete set of Structural Rules for SSS and DSS Bulk Carriers
    • Length greater than or equal to 90m
csr development schedule
CSR Development Schedule

Final Rules to

IACS council

Dec 1st

Publish

15 Jan

2006

1 Jan

2006

30 Sep 2005

Jun 2004

1 Jan 2005

15 Apr 2005

1 Apr 2006

Short-term

Harmonisation

1st Draft available to Public

End date for comments on 1st Draft

2nd Draft JTP available to Public

End date for comments on 2nd Draft

CSR Adopted

CSR Effective

slide6

IACS CSR Schedule and Scope

Harmonization Progress

Rule Update on JTP

Rule Update on JBP

Discussion

csr harmonization roadmap
CSR Harmonization Roadmap
  • Short-term Harmonization
    • Elimination of blocking factors to allow adoption by all 10 societies of both Tanker and Bulk Carrier rules on 1 January 2006
  • Long-term Harmonization
    • Further harmonization will take place afterward in an agreed time frame to be advised to industry. Time plan to be delivered Council November 30th 2005.
csr harmonization roadmap8
CSR Harmonization Roadmap
  • Short-term
    • Hull Girder Wave Shear
    • Hull Girder Ultimate Strength
    • Prescriptive Buckling
    • Finite element analysis procedures
    • Coating and Corrosion additions
  • Long-term
    • Wave loads
    • Fatigue
    • Finite element analysis
    • Buckling
short term harmonization
Short-term Harmonization
  • Hull girder wave shear
    • Hull girder shear force is consistent between Tankers and Bulk Carriers
  • Hull girder ultimate strength
    • Capacity will use either Tanker or Bulk Carrier method since they are basically identical
    • Loads will use two checks, one driven by SWBM and the other one driven by the wave moment
short term harmonization11
Short-term Harmonization
  • Buckling
    • Prescriptive buckling to use closed-form methods
    • Tanker “advanced buckling” method only to be used in tanker FEM evaluation
  • Finite element analysis
    • Tanker procedure (direct only) used in the Tanker Rules
    • Bulk Carrier procedures (direct and superposition) used in the Bulk Carrier Rules, provided the two methods result in common requirements
short term harmonization12
Short-term Harmonization
  • Coating and Corrosion additions
    • Consistent definition and values for similar areas and environments will be used
    • Consistent definition of rounding will be used
    • Based on Recent feedback from Ship Owners’ groups, increases are decided
    • Requirements to coatings of internal spaces in ballast tanks will be included in the rules (in line with IACS Industry proposal DE48/12)
harmonised principles
Harmonised principles
  • Use JBP two surface approach for determination of wastage allowance and consequently corrosion addition.
  • Use JTP method for rounding
common corrosion additions
Common corrosion additions

Deck, external surface

Internals in

Deck and Sheerstrake in WBT

upper portion

of WBT

Stringer in WBT

Sideshell in WBT

Stiffeners

Long.b

in WBT

Webplate in WBT

h

2

d

Faceplate in WBT

Long girders in WBT

Stiffeners

Bottom and bilge

in WBT

slide15

IACS CSR Schedule and Scope

Harmonization Progress

Rule Update on JTP

Rule Update on JBP

Discussion

item 1 2 common structural rules for oil tankers joint tanker project jtp

Item 1.2Common Structural Rules for Oil TankersJoint Tanker Project (JTP)

Tripartite MeetingBeijing, 31 October 2005

slide17

Content

  • JTP Status
  • Feedback from industry through recent meeting and 2nd draft rule hearing
  • Main rule updates from 2nd draft of March 2005
jtp rule deliveries
JTP Rule deliveries

1.0

2.0

3.0

3.1

3.2

  • 1st draft
    • Sent for hearing June 2004
  • 2nd draft
    • Sent for hearing April 2005
    • Updates based on hearing comments

and further Rule development

  • 3rd draft
    • Posted on www.jtprules.com October 2005
    • Intermediate delivery for Technical Committee meetings
    • Changes made per 1 September 05 included
  • Change document package 1
    • Expected posted on www.jtprules.com 1 November 05
    • Includes updates from 2nd hearing, harmonisation and minor issues from recent industry meetings.
  • Change document package 2
    • Expected posted on www.jtprules.com 9 November 05
    • Includes latest hearing comments, final harmonisation issues and updates from 2nd hearing, final harmonisation conclusions and major issues from recent industry meetings.
jtp rule deliveries19
JTP Rule deliveries
  • Rule version for council adoption
    • Available 1 December 2005
    • Compilation of 3rd draft, change document 1 & 2 and updates from TC meetings.
  • Published Rules
    • Available 15 January 2006
summary of jtp feedback
Summary of JTP Feedback
  • 1st hearing
    • 2834 comments received during hearing period
    • 988 (35%) of which resulted in either editorial or rule change
    • 197 of which are noted for future development
  • 2nd hearing
    • 228 comments received during hearing period
    • 76 (33%) of which will result in either editorial or rule change
    • 12 of which are noted for future development
jtp issues from recent industry meetings
JTP Issues from recent industry meetings
  • Meetings with Korean and Japanese industry (KSA and SAJ/JSA) September 2005
  • a) General scantling increase
  • Issue: Feedback received that the general scantling increase needs justification and not supported by damage records
  • Rule change: Criteria reviewed and some of the allowable stresses for plate and stiffener requirements have been increased by 5-7%.
  • b) Localised large increases due from FE buckling assessment
  • Issue: 2nd draft JTP Rules require in some areas net scantling that are significantly above the as-built scantlings of present fleet. Typically buckling assessment for FE is the cause for the increase.
  • Rule change: FE procedure has been further reviewed taking into account combined probability of cargo density, loading pattern and dynamic load level. Following this a correction factor will be applied on the cargo pressure for the extreme dynamic load combination. Consequently the related increases on the inner bulkheads and stringers will be reduced.
jtp issues from recent industry meetings22
JTP Issues from recent industry meetings
  • c)Fatigue
  • Issue: A fatigue design standard of 25 years operation in North Atlantic wave environment is too severe taking into account the typical operation of the majority of tankers. The criteria in principle disallows designs with material of HT36 in deck.
  • Rule change: As the 25 NA design standard is given in the draft IMO Goal Based Standard the project has decided not to make any amendments to the fatigue target.
  • d) Hull girder ultimate strength
  • Issue: The hull girder ULS requirement as given in second draft is too severe and some existing vessels will not pass the criteria even in the as-built scantlings. Use of material of HT36 is needed for compliance but contradicts the fatigue criteria.
  • Rule change: Studies performed during the Rule development do not show the same “problem”. Further investigations are being done on the hull girder ULS criteria to see if further adjustment of the load combination factors are needed.
  • e) IACS recommendation 47 Shipbuilding and Repair Quality Standard
  • Issue: IACS recommendation is not up to date and may cause conflicts with commonly used national standards.
  • Rule change: The comment has been forwarded to IACS Survey Panel. The Rules have been updated to make it clear that acceptable national standards are allowed. Rec. 47 is used as common reference document for strength assessment (imperfections)
jtp issues from recent industry meetings23
JTP Issues from recent industry meetings

Hull Scantlings

Design

Service

Corrosion

Corrosion

Margin

Corrosion

Addition

Predicted corrosion

in 2.5 years (0.5 mm)

Required

Renewal

Thickness

Required

Net

Thickness

  • Meetings with Union of Greek Shipowners, October 2005
  • a) Corrosion margins
  • Issue: The corrosion margins are too small for a design life of 25 years and will lead to a significant amount of steel replacement.
  • Rule change: Opinions and proposals were presented during the meeting and the IACS members agreed to review closely whether it is a need and possibility to update the margins taking into account all industry feedback and service records.
  • b) Coating performance standard
  • Issue: The UGS informed that the lack of a minimum performance standard for coating leads to large variation in the standard and actual life of coatings. For some ships the coating is so poor that compete renewal by sandblasting and re-coating is needed after few years in operation.
  • Rule change: IACS agreed to include a requirement for a minimum performance standard in the common structural Rules. Further discussion will be made within IACS on this but the referenced standard is expected to be based on IACS submission to DE 48.
main rule updates from 2nd draft
Main rule updates from 2nd draft

0.55

0.80

  • Corrosion addition
  • Two surface approach for corrosion addition (JBP method) with common values except for C/hold
  • Minimum coating performance standard based on IACS submission to IMO’ DE 48 added
  • Longitudinal strength
  • Buckling capacity method from JBP replaces advanced buckling method in hull girder buckling assessment
  • Initial hull girder buckling assessment (IACS UR S11) is removed
  • Hull girder wave shear force reduced to IACS S11 (same as JBP)
  • Hull girder shear strength, allowable stress for harbour condition increased and rule minimum SWSF introduced, consistent with corresponding FE loading pattern (full/empty across)
  • Hull girder ultimate strength
  • Partial safety factors and ultimate moment capacity from JBP added
  • Bending and shear strength: plates, stiffeners and primary support members
  • Generally allowable stresses for static/frequent loads increased by 6-7 %
  • Plates and primary support members, max.allowable stress for extreme load increased by 6-7 %
  • Cargo hold FE analysis
  • number of load combinations reduced by ca. 40%
  • target H.G. shear force only applicable
  • for full/empty across loading pattern
  • VLCC, draught changes for loading pattern empty across
  • (Sea: 0.6=>0.55T Harb.: 0.8=>0.65T) /
  • full across (Sea: 0.6=>0.8T Harb.: 0.33=>0.7T),
  • and empty centre tank (Sea: T=> 0.9T )
  • Probability factor on cargo liquid pressure taking
  • into account the extreme load combination of cargo
  • density, loading pattern & extreme accelerations
slide25

IACS CSR Schedule and Scope

Harmonization Progress

Rule Update on JTP

Rule Update on JBP

Discussion

tripartite meeting beijing october 31 2005

Tripartite meetingBeijing, October 31, 2005

Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers

Joint Bulker Project (JBP)

main principles
MAIN PRINCIPLES
  • SAFETY
    • Draft Bulk Carriers Rules provide minimum net scantlings
    • Ship condition is safe as far as scantlings of the ship in service are larger than net required values
    • Periodic close-up surveys and thickness measurements and 0.5 mm margin between surveys provide adequate guarantee of safety
  • MAINTAINABILITY
    • Control local corrosion in holds through periodic inspection and mandatory coating requirements
    • Allow 25 years of service without extensive steel replacement on a well maintained ship
subject ships used in the ramification study acc 2nd draft
Subject Ships used in the ramification study acc. 2nd draft

# size S-25

D1 cape compliant

D2 handymax -

D3 handymax -

DSS

D4 cape compliant

D5 cape compliant

S1 cape -

S2 panamax -

Ramification study

acc. 2nd draft

S3 handymax -

S4 cape -

S5 panamax -

SSS

S6 panamax compliant

SS1 mini-handy <150m

SS2 mini-handy <150m

SS3 mini-handy <150m

weight increment by 2nd draft
Weight Increment by 2nd draft
  • In the ramification study according to 2nd draft,
  • - Strength against slamming
  • - Buckling strength of hull-girder
  • Fatigue strength assessment
  • On-going changes
  • have been further considered in addition to:
  • - Local scantling calculations
  • - Ultimate strength check
  • - Yielding check of Hull-girder
  • - Direct strength analysis

Following requirements are newly introduced in the 2nd draft and considered in the study.

- Corrosion addition (Wastage allowance) is increased by 0.5mm.

- Flooded condition is applied to DSS BC according to the SOLAS regulation CH. XII

summary of weight increment by 2 nd draft 1
Summary of Weight Increment by 2nd draft (1)

2.7 (3.4)

3.1 (3.9)

3.7 (4.6)

3.4 (4.3)

3.6 (4.5)

2.7 (3.4)

3.0 (3.7)

  • Ratio of steel increment to light weight(steel weight)
corrosion
CORROSION
  • Main concern
    • Local corrosion (grooving, necking effect) and general corrosion of frames of side shell structure is difficult to detect and is behind the majority of hull damages suffered in the past

Frequency of incidents per BC Classes

uniform corrosion allowance s
Uniform Corrosion Allowances
  • Known only in a statistical way
    • Some vessels have practically no corrosion, others are heavily corroded
    • Dependant on factors such as cargo carried, environment, quality of coating, etc.
    • Dependant on maintenance policy
    • All of these factors are included in the statistical results
  • Available statistics
    • NK/IACS statistics are more general and accurate than other existing ones and results correlate well with other CS experience
    • Wastage allowance corresponding to upper 10% of measurements provide generally adequate margins
modifications of jbp rules after the second draft
MODIFICATIONS OF JBP RULESAFTER THE SECOND DRAFT
  • MAJOR CHANGES
    • Larger uniform corrosion wastage allowances for transverse bulkheads in line with 90% probability of non-exceedance
    • Thickness rounding procedure is modified, due to harmonisation between JTP and JBP
    • Finite element models are now only three holds models, with modified boundary conditions to provide same results between directand superposition methods
chapter 1 general principles
Chapter 1 General Principles

MODIFICATIONS OF JBP RULES (1 &3)

  • 1. Grab notation for Handysize vessels under development
      • 20 tons grab discharge is mandatory for BC-A and BC-B, but lead to unreasonable reinforcements for Handy’s

Chapter 3Structural Design Principles

  • 2. Modification of thickness rounding procedure and corrosion additions
      • Harmonization with JTP (see new proposal)
      • Increase of wastage allowances for transverse bulkheads
  • 3. Modifications of structural arrangement principles (sec 6) further to Industry comments (UGS)
chapter 4 design loads
Chapter 4 Design Loads

MODIFICATIONS OF JBP RULES (4 &5)

  • 4. Detailed mass curves procedure is included (App 1)
  • 5. Still-water shear force in flooded condition is now defined and definitions of loads clarified (Sec 3)

Ch. 5 Hull girder strength

  • 6. Modification of the requirements for the ultimate strength of the hull girder (Sec 2)
      • Harmonization with JTP for wave bending moment safety factor
      • Deletion of nonlinear FEM method, which is still under investigation at ISSC
slide36

MODIFICATIONS OF JBP RULES (6)

  • 7. Redundancy requirements according to the new IMO interpretation of SOLAS XII/6.5.3(Sec 2) under development

Ch. 6 Hull scantlings

8. Prescriptive requirements for transverse bulkheads in way of ballast holds of ships of less than 150 m in length (Sec 1 & 2)

9. Modifications of minimum thicknesses for inner side of DSS BC’s and hopper plating (Sec 1)

10. Modification of scantlings for steel coils loading (Sec 1 & 2)

11. Modification of scantlings of ordinary stiffeners in flooding condition (Sec 2)

slide37

MODIFICATIONS OF JBP RULES (7)

  • 12. Unification of FEM models & boundary conditions (Sec 1)
      • Direct and superposition methods both use a three holds model and common boundary conditions in order to obtain same scantlings
      • Self-weight of structure is clearly introduced

Ch.7 Direct strength assessment

13. Buckling requirements for DSA have been modified in Ch 6 Sec 3 and an how-to procedure introduced in Sec 1

ch 8 fatigue check of structural details
Ch. 8 Fatigue check of structural details

MODIFICATIONS OF JBP RULES (8 &9)

  • 14. Table 1 Sec 4 of stress concentration factors of typical structural details have been completed and amended
  • 15. Computation of fatigue stress range in hatch corners have been completely revised (Sec 5)

Ch. 9 Other structures

16. Impact pressure on flat bottom forward have been modified and transfered in Ch 4 Sec 5

slide39

IACS CSR Schedule and Scope

Harmonization Progress

Rule Update on JTP

Rule Update on JBP

Discussion

review
Review

IACS CSR Schedule and Scope

Harmonization Progress

Rule Update on JTP

Rule Update on JBP

Discussion