the institutionalization of clean tech an emergent field n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
The Institutionalization of Clean Tech: An emergent field PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
The Institutionalization of Clean Tech: An emergent field

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 12

The Institutionalization of Clean Tech: An emergent field - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

The Institutionalization of Clean Tech: An emergent field. Benson Honig Teresa Cascioli Chair in Entrepreneurial Leadership; McMaster University, Hamilton Ontario. Institutionalization: Why should we care?.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

The Institutionalization of Clean Tech: An emergent field

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
the institutionalization of clean tech an emergent field

The Institutionalization of Clean Tech: An emergent field

Benson Honig

Teresa Cascioli Chair in Entrepreneurial Leadership; McMaster University, Hamilton Ontario

institutionalization why should we care
Institutionalization: Why should we care?
  • Much research on technology clusters examines successful environments, attempting to draw conclusions
  • This success bias has inspired a plethora of industry in the production of “silicon XX’s”, including“ glenns”, vadies, alleys, etc…
  • Due to this success bias, we know less about the implications for emergent clusters, problems, and possible negative consequences of cluster seeding efforts
  • Questions: “how does the institutionalization of government economic policy emerge, and what are the resulting consequences?” “To what extent is policy driven by pragmatism, opportunism, political rhetoric, research, public opinion, desperation or expediancy?”
  • Much work has been done examining the isomorphism of institutions such as education, science, development, fads and fashions
  • Research regarding the success or failure of public initiatives and economic development is quite mixed, but provides little guidance for emergent technologies
  • Less work has been done examining the emergence of new clusters in real time, particularly as a specific target of governmental (regional, national, local) targeted development
comparative research
Comparative research
  • Powell et al did a study examining high-tech cluster in the life sciences retrospectively
  • They looked retrospectively at 11 clusters at 3 points in time: 1990; 1996; 2002
  • They found government policies were important to cluster formation
  • Best results when region pursued open norms of scientific research. Public research or universities served as cluster anchor
comparative research1
Comparative research
  • Each of their different clusters had unique path dependent trajectories – but only 3 were successful, and it would have been virtually impossible to predict which would succeed
  • Interfirm collaboration was essential in the successful clusters (Boston, Bay Area, San Diego) – in San Diego, an official network provided great help- in Silicon Valley, Stanford helped- virtuous ties of local first, other clusters second, and global linkages last.
  • Local ties were sparse in non-successful regions. Instead, they developed external (to region) linkages, and were dominated by one very strong local organization.
  • High Growth regions had both local and global ties
top cleantech countries shawn lesser founder and president of sustainable world capital
Top cleantech countries* *Shawn Lesser founder and president of Sustainable World Capital
  • 1 Denmark
  • 2 Germany
  • 3Sweden
  • 4 UK
  • 5 Israel
  • 6 Switzerland
  • 7 USA
  • 8 UAE
  • 9 China
  • 10 Canada
canada s strategy
Canada’s strategy
  • Canada has jumped fully into the clean-tech pond.
  • “on many fronts, there are high hopes that Ontario's clean technology will become an important contributor to Ontario’s economy ( OCF, 2009:17).
  • “Global demand for clean technologies such as alternative energy generation technologies……has grown substantially in the past few yeas….spurred by increasing energy and water costs, targets set by international agreements such as the Kyoto protocol the desire for energy self-sufficiency, and the public’s call for cleaner, more environmentally sustainable means of living, the demand for clean technologies will see rapid and sustained growth for the next several years. This demand is likely to increase as governments around the world now look to stimulate their economies through investments in infrastructure and clean technologies. (Group, 2009)
  • To create a knowledge advantage, Canada’s federal government will focus strategically on research in areas that are in the national interest from a social and economic perspective. The four area are : Environmental science and technologies; natural resources and energy; health and related life sciences and technologies; information and communication technology (Public works and government services, 2007). Chapter entitled “improving Canadians’ lives and opportunities through science and technology: federal government is encouraging environmental innovation by : creating clear and effective policy frameworks for the environment: 2) creating the ecoenergy technology initiative 3) supporting collaborative research initiatives to improve the recovery of energy and 4) creating the Canada trust for Clean Air and Climate Change to support projects.
  • in 2008 there were over 2,600 Ontario companies generating 7 billion employing 65,000 people a year, 7 billion in revenue. The majority are engineering firms .(group:23).
  • Wind Technology: Goal to become a global wind energy leader that meets more than 20% of its electricity needs through wind energy by 2025 (Canada). Goals include the creation of at least 52,000 jobs, 1.5 billion in annual business activity, 132 billion in investment.
in a chapter entitled making canada a world leader
In a chapter entitled “making Canada a World Leader”
  • “it is no longer enough for countries to support S&T only from a national perspective. Canada must be connected to the global supply of ideas, talent and technologies….Canada and the state of California have embarked on a strategic partnership to achieve world-class research strength in areas such as cancer stem cell research, infectious diseases, sustainable energy, and ICT broadband. Strategic international and inter-sectoral collaboration among governments, researchers, industry and investors is pointing the way toward new approaches to positioning Canada as a global R&D innovation leader (Public works and government services, 2007)”
more promises
More promises
  • NDP promises to spend 8 billion over 4 years: 4 billion for auto sector, 3 billion for green collar jobs
  • Liberals promise 1 billion advanced manufacturing prosperity fund for green tech
  • Conservatives (Current Harper Government) created 1 billion eco-trust fund (SDTC), also 230 million to induce clean-energy policies
canada s perspective
Canada’s perspective
  • A higher share of electricity is generated in Canada by renewable sources than almost anywhere else. How will this effect EV development?
  • Calls have been made to invest in energy storage devices, promote development of charging infrastructure, create regulation and standardization, harmonize in North Am,,legislate building codes, and convert used vehicles to electrification
orientation of this study
Orientation of this study
  • Will employ institutional theory to comparatively examine the emergence of specific clean-tech clusters around automobile conversion
  • The automobile industry is notable both for its role in industrialization (oligopoly) and job creation, as well as the implications of a technological paradigm shift. Rust-belt environments are competing heavily to capture technological renewal. Ontario produces more cars than any US state (2.7 million in 2004). Big 3, Honda, Toyota
  • How do regional and national programs impact, both positively and negatively, the emergence of new clean-tech models? To what extent are these path dependent?
one possible additional target
One possible additional Target
  • Shai Agassi’s better place: how will the four demonstration regions (Denmark, Israel, Australia; future Canada, USA, France)
  • How do strategic partners and investor alliances constrast or compare with governmental policies?
  • A123 Systems;Acorns to Oaks II;AGL;Automotive Energy Supply Corporatio;DONG Energy;Esarbee Investments Canada;GC Investments LLC;Hawaiian Electric Company;HSBC;Israel Cleantech Ventures ;Israel Corp.;Lazard;Macquarie Capital;Maniv Energy Capital;Morgan Stanley ;Musea Ventures ;Ofer Group ;Renault-Nissan Alliance;VantagePoint Venture Partners;Vayikra Partners;Wolfensohn & Co.