1 / 6

Gabriel Montenegro gab@sun Sun IETF-47, Adelaide 3/00

Gabriel Montenegro gab@sun.com Sun IETF-47, Adelaide 3/00. SLOW and ERROR Updates (rev 03) draft-ietf-pilc-slow-03.txt dawkins, montenegro,kojo, magret draft-ietf-pilc-error-03.txt dawkins, montenegro,kojo, magret, vaidya. Cosmetic changes to prepare for advancement as BCP

yeriel
Download Presentation

Gabriel Montenegro gab@sun Sun IETF-47, Adelaide 3/00

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gabriel Montenegro gab@sun.com Sun IETF-47, Adelaide 3/00 SLOW and ERROR Updates(rev 03)draft-ietf-pilc-slow-03.txtdawkins, montenegro,kojo, magretdraft-ietf-pilc-error-03.txtdawkins, montenegro,kojo, magret, vaidya

  2. Cosmetic changes to prepare for advancement as BCP change from Explicit Corruption Notification to Explicit Transmission Error Notification in ERROR New sections in both drafts to separate recommended mechanisms Topics for Further Work section on interesting, but not completely understood or easily standardized mechanisms New Appendixes on experimental mechanisms Both drafts currently in LAST CALL till April 7 SLOW and ERROR Changes

  3. example in section 2.3 with respect to receive and router buffer sizes needs to be redone (markku) should we recommend RED? should we recommend ECN? Section on MTU, beef up with LINK’s section Issues with SLOW

  4. section 1.2 on relationship with LINK could use some editing section 2.2 on aimd is not accurate section 2.2, why congestion windows remain small #2 is inaccurate #3 must be removed, it is not general (only applies to LTNs) Issues with Error

  5. section 4.0, first paragraph on SACK-EXT (aka DSACK) needs to be updated as it is no longer an experimental mechanism (confirm with s.floyd) section 4.0, second paragraph on delayed dupacks needs clarification Appendix A: Delayed Dupacks clarify link-layers in which it is usefuol (from rfc2757) Appendix B: Transmission Error Notifications or should there be a new appendix on link outages and contribute my text on it Issues with Error (2)

  6. Still some changes are desireable. Do we need another last call? Conclusion

More Related