80 likes | 191 Views
This meta-analysis discusses the effectiveness of non-metric procedures in pattern recognition, specifically focusing on labeled faces, CalTech datasets, and SVM, highlighting the benefits of non-metric approaches over metric ones.
E N D
Good recognition is non-metric W.J. Scheirer, M.J. Wilber, M. Eckmann, T.E. Boult Pattern Recognition, August 2014, 47(2014)2721–2731 Coffee Talk
Metric distances Meta-analysis on published results w.r.t. metric procedures Coffee Talk
Labeled Faces in the Wild (LFW) performances Coffee Talk
CalTech 101, 15 training images Coffee Talk
CalTech 101, 30 training images Coffee Talk
Multi-class SVM (non-metric) is better and faster than metric learning Coffee Talk
Conclusions Many popular procedures are non-metric when applied pairwise Multi-class SVM One shot similarity Cosine similarity PLDA Tom-vs-Pete … it is unclear what advantage, if any, would be provided by enforcing the constraints of symmetry and the triangle inequality. …. What is the advantage of metric learning? Coffee Talk