1 / 5

DEFENSE TRADE ADVISORY GROUP

DEFENSE TRADE ADVISORY GROUP. COMMODITY JURISDICTION WORKING GROUP. Importance of CJ Process and Determinations. Product and technology classification is a fundamental aspect of any export licensing analysis § 120.4 provides a process through which classifications can occur

yasuo
Download Presentation

DEFENSE TRADE ADVISORY GROUP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DEFENSE TRADE ADVISORY GROUP COMMODITY JURISDICTION WORKING GROUP

  2. Importance of CJ Process and Determinations • Product and technology classification is a fundamental aspect of any export licensing analysis • § 120.4 provides a process through which classifications can occur • Clarity concerning the § 120.3 criteria for classifying products or technology as USML items is key to ensuring determinations which meet the objectives of the Arms Export Control Act 1

  3. Tasks accomplished and to be continued • Review the current CJ process • Identify issues related to the CJ process that may benefit from revision or clarification • Identify consistencies and inconsistencies in CJ determinations, policies for designating defense articles, and similar issues • Draft and suggest possible revisions to the CJ process or ITAR language related to classifications 2

  4. Status • The Working Group met on April 22, 2005 • Based on the meeting, the Working Group intends to work with State to: • focus on the § 120.3 criteria for making CJ decisions • discuss and clarify the documentation to be submitted to State to permit the Government to make a CJ determination; and • understand the CJ template currently under development to provide comments on maximizing its use and effectiveness. 3

  5. Membership • Giovanna Cinelli, Chair • Dan Cook • Debi Davis • Ken Holden • Beth Ann Johnson • Joel Johnson • Brad Lewis • John Liebman • Suzanne Palmer • Vicki Ralston • Jim Reed • Mike Rickey • Catherine Thornberry 4

More Related