Download
slide1 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Society of American Military Engineers PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Society of American Military Engineers

Society of American Military Engineers

118 Views Download Presentation
Download Presentation

Society of American Military Engineers

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Society of American Military Engineers FY2012 Department of Energy Programs Michael A. Peek, P.E., CCE, CFM Office of Engineering & Construction Management (OECM) September 22, 2011 Army Navy Club

  2. DOE Organization • $11.8B Budget (NNSA) • Nuclear non-proliferation • Nuclear weapons stewardship • $6.1B Budget (EM) • Demo, remediation and restoration • $.2B Budget (LM) • Long-term stewardship • $4.8B Budget • Nuclear Energy(NE) • Fossil Energy (FE) • Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) • Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability (OE) • $5.4B Budget (SC) • Advanced scientific computing • Basic energy sciences • Fusion energy • High energy physics • Nuclear physics • Biological & environmental research

  3. Major DOELaboratories & Field Facilities • .

  4. Office of Engineering and Construction Management (OECM) • Project Management (PM) and Real Property Management Policy, Guidance and Oversight • Validate project performance baseline (scope, cost and schedule) before Congressional Budget Request: Projects with a Total Project Cost (*TPC) ≥$100M • Conduct External Independent Review (EIRs) • Conduct Independent Cost Reviews/Estimates (ICRs/ICEs) • Monitor Project Performance on behalf of Deputy Secretary • All Projects with a TPC ≥$10M • Oversee DOE Earned Value Management System Certification * Total Project Cost = Design + Construction + Other Direct Costs

  5. PM Differences: DOE vs. DOD • Program vs. Project • Bundling (DOE) vs. De-Bundling (DOD) • Major Items of Equipment, “MIE” (e.g., Linear Accelerator Systems vs. Aircraft Trainers) • In Project (DOE) vs. Out of Project (DOD) • Incremental Funding (DOE) vs. Full Funding (DOD) • Cost Contracting (DOE) vs. Firm Fixed Price (DOD) • M&O (Management and Operations) Interface vs. Government

  6. FY12 Congressional Budget Requestby Program ($M)

  7. Project Portfolio Critical Decision 0 – Approve Mission Need Critical Decision 1 – Selection of Alternative and Cost Range Critical Decision 2 – Approve Performance Baseline Critical Decision 3 – Start Construction Critical Decision 4 – Project Completion/Transition to Operations

  8. In Planning (CD-0) Critical Decision 0 – Approve Mission Need Critical Decision 1 – Selection of Alternative and Cost Range

  9. In Planning (CD-1) Critical Decision 1 – Selection of Alternative and Cost Range Critical Decision 2 – Approve Performance Baseline

  10. Project Portfolio (Post CD-2 ) Critical Decision 2 – Approve Performance Baseline Critical Decision 3 – Start Construction

  11. In Design (Post CD-2) Critical Decision 2 – Approve Performance Baseline

  12. Under Construction (Post CD-3) Critical Decision 3 – Approve Start of Construction

  13. Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) @ Hanford, WA

  14. WTP Construction

  15. Mixed Oxide Facility @ Savannah River Site, SC

  16. MOX Construction

  17. National Synchrotron Light Source II Site Plan NSLS-II CFN NSLS

  18. NSLS II Construction NSLS II NSLS

  19. K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant Decontamination and Decommissioning K-33 K-31 K-25 K-27

  20. K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant Decontamination and Decommissioning

  21. Thomas Jefferson Lab:12 GeV Upgrade Scope Upgrade magnets and power supplies • Upgrade is designed to build on existing facility: • vast majority of accelerator and experimental equipment have continued use CHL-2 Scope of the proposed project includes: - Doubling the accelerator beam energy - New experimental hall & beamline - Upgrades to existing 3 experimental halls Enhance capabilities in existing Halls

  22. Thomas Jefferson Lab:12 GeV Upgrade Site Area New Experimental Hall & Beamline Present Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) East Arc D CHL-2 South Linac North Linac Injector West Arc A C B

  23. Questions?

  24. Project Management Process“Acquisition Management System” with Critical Decision (CD) Milestones Independent Review (OECM EIR >$100M ) to Validate PB OECM EIR for Major System (>$750M) Projects Request PED Funds PED Funds Operating Funds Construction Funds Operating Funds Initiation Definition Execution Closeout TPC CD-2 Approve Performance Baseline (PB) CD-0 Approve Mission Need CD-1 Approve Alternative Selection and Cost Range CD-3 Approve Start of Construction or Execution CD-4 Approve Start of Operations or Project Completion Critical Decision Projects Report Earned Value ≥ $20M PARS II Reporting for Projects ≥ $10M