1 / 36

TeV scale U niversal seesaw, vacuum stability and Heavy Higgs at the LHC

TeV scale U niversal seesaw, vacuum stability and Heavy Higgs at the LHC. Yongchao Zhang ( 张永超 ) Center for High-Energy Physics, Peking University w/ Rabi N. Mohapatra , 1401.6701, JHEP06(2014)072 June 14, 2014 Shaanxi Normal University. Outline. Motivation Modeling

xiang
Download Presentation

TeV scale U niversal seesaw, vacuum stability and Heavy Higgs at the LHC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TeV scale Universal seesaw, vacuum stability and Heavy Higgs at the LHC Yongchao Zhang (张永超) Center for High-Energy Physics, Peking University w/ Rabi N. Mohapatra, 1401.6701, JHEP06(2014)072 June 14, 2014 Shaanxi Normal University

  2. Outline • Motivation • Modeling • Stabilizing the vacuum • Heavy Higgs • Heavy vector-like fermions • Neutrinos • Conclusion

  3. 126 GeV Higgs observed!

  4. PDG2013 1112.3022 SM vacuum unstable (metastable) • Running of λ is sensitive to the Higgs and top masses • What does near criticality of the H and t masses mean? Nearby new physics?...... • Maybe NP are needed to stabilize the SM vacuum, with new particles coupling to the SM Higgs

  5. Main idea of the Left-Right universal Seesaw Model (SLRM) • Seesaw mechanism  SM quarks & charged leptons universal seesaw (Berezhiani 1983, Chang & Mohapatra 1987, Rajpoot 1987, Davidson & Wali 1987, Babu & Mohapatra 1989, 1990) • Left-right symmetric (Mohapatra & Pati, 1975, Senjanovic & Mohapatra, 1975) • Providing a solution to the Strong CP problem without an axion(Babu& Mohapatra, 1989, 1990)

  6. matter content • Left-right symmetric • Adding the vector-like fermions to realize the seesaw mechanism

  7. Simple Higgs sector • Only two Higgs doublets • Simple potential • LR symmetry: softly broken by the mass terms, • LR symmetry: only one extra scalar coupling, • Simple spectrum: only two (neutral) physical Higgs particles

  8. Yukawa interaction • LR symmetric Yukawa interaction • Seesaw mechanism • O(1) Yukawa interactions: ultra-heavy partner fermions;TeV RH scale and partner masses: smaller couplings. • All the flavor structure resides in the Yukawa interactions, e.g., with MP,N,E & Yu diagonal,

  9. Stabilizing the vacuum • The scalar quartic coupling is larger than in the SM, • Top Yukawa coupling generally larger than in the SM (the NLO corrections beyond seesaw is important), • The other couplings are generally negligible, altough they are larger than in the SM,

  10. RGEs • RGEs below the RH scale

  11. RGEs • RGEs above the RH scale

  12. Matching conditions • Gauge couplings in the context of GUT (Mohapatra, 2002, book), • Scalar quartic couplings • Yukawa couplings

  13. Vacuum stability • Vacuum stability conditions • Gauge interactions grand unified: RGE run only up to the GUT scale but not to the Planck scale • Perturbativity: λ1 < 3 • Simplifying the heavy mass parameters,Given vR & MF, all the Yukawa couplings are fixed • Free parameters in the simplified case vR λ1 MF

  14. Vacuum stability: examples

  15. Vacuum stability: parameter scan ATLAS-CONF-2013-051 Collider constraint

  16. Vacuum stability: if λ2<0… ATLAS-CONF-2013-051 Collider constraint Collider constraint

  17. Constraints on heavy Higgs (H) mass • Heavy Higgs mass is determined by the RH scale and λ1 • The matching condition of λ1 says that λ1 > λ, • The parameter scan shows that when λ1 is large enough it would enter the non-perturbative region at high energy scales, NOT consider constraint on the heavy vector-like fermions

  18. Constraints on the fermion masses • Large Yukawa couplings would worsen the stability problem. • One important implication is that the partners of bottom and tauon is below the RH scale. • The large top Yukawa coupling contribute significantly to the top partner mass. Upper bounds

  19. SM Higgs in the extended model • Higgs Production: The top partner loop is suppressed by the scalar mixing or the LH fermion top mixing angle,The top quark loop dominates… • Higgs decayBelow the RH scale, all the beyond SM particles are integrated out, and we recover the SM as an effective theory

  20. Heavy Higgs production at LHC14 • Top loop gluon fusion channel is suppressed by the scalar mixing or LH top mixing angle, • Dominate channel: gluon fusion via top partner loop

  21. Heavy Higgs decay • Dominate decay channels • Theses 2nd-4th channels are suppressed, respectively, by • The diphoton channel is dominated by the WR, t and T loops,generally of order 10-5, not practically observable

  22. Quartering rule in the massive limit • In the massive limit vR→, the fermion channel is suppressed by the LR scale ratio, and the other three channels, • This originate from the coupling of H to the four component of χL in the potential.

  23. Quartering rule in the massive limit

  24. What if MH>2MF?... • In a large parameter space, the di-top-partner channel is not allowed • The bottom and tau partner channels are suppressed by the small scalar mixing and light-heavy fermion mixing anglesgenerally of order 10-3

  25. Neutrinos in SLRM without • Dirac neutrino masses generated at 2-loop level (Babu & X-G He, 1989)

  26. Neutrinos in SLRM with • With only Dirac masses for the neutrino partners:Ultrahigh energy scale of MN or ultra-small Yukawa couplings • With both Dirac and Majorana masses of MN, in the basis of • The neutrino masses read, when MN≤ ML,R

  27. Conclusion • Vacuum stabilized in the left-right universal seesaw model • Simple Higgs sector: only one heavy neutral Higgs H, • Higgs H mass is constrained below the RH scale, • The phenomenology of H could be tested at LHC14, with the characteristic quartering decay rule, • The vector-like heavy fermions are at or below the RH scale, and are accessible at LHC.

  28. Open questions • Neutrino physics in SLRM? • SLRM  Higgs inflation? • CP violation and baryogenesis in SLRM?

  29. Thank you very much!!!

  30. Backup slides

  31. Strong CP problem • Strong CP parameter • With parity soft broken, θ=0, • Then the strong CP violation can be generated at 2-loop level (Babu & Mohapatra, 1990)

  32. Vacuum stability: parameter scan

  33. Vacuum stability: parameter scan

  34. Collider constraint on MF ATLAS-CONF-2013-051

  35. SM Higgs coupling • Triple Higgs coupling

  36. Couplings in H decay • Couplings beyond SM in the H decay widthsWith ε and α, respectively, the scalar mixing angle and Light-Heavy fermion mixing angle

More Related