1 / 19

Content, Context & Capacity: large-scale collaborative digitization at TRLN

Content, Context & Capacity: large-scale collaborative digitization at TRLN. ALA annual 2012, OCLC panel “The Power of Groups: Collaboration and Innovation” Joyce Chapman Triangle Research Libraries Network. background. The CCC project.

xanthe
Download Presentation

Content, Context & Capacity: large-scale collaborative digitization at TRLN

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Content, Context & Capacity: large-scale collaborative digitization at TRLN ALA annual 2012, OCLC panel “The Power of Groups: Collaboration and Innovation” Joyce Chapman Triangle Research Libraries Network

  2. background

  3. The CCC project • 3-year LSTA funded digitization grant exploring consortial large-scale digitization • 400,000 digital objects from four institutions • Audio, still image, manuscript • Modern 20th century materials • Thematic focus: civil rights movement in NC

  4. Goals • To promote and support educational and scholarly research use of modern manuscripts beyond the walls of our physical buildings • To provide a proof of concept for a collaborative approach to large-scale digitization • To develop shared standards and practices • To test inter-institutional workflows between consortial partners

  5. Triangle Research Libraries Network Mission: “to marshal the financial, human, and information resources of our research libraries through cooperative efforts, in order to create a rich and unparalleled knowledge environment that furthers the universities' teaching, research, and service missions.”

  6. Triangle Research Libraries Network • Tradition of cooperative print collecting • Recent: joint licensing of electronic resources • Recent: shared staff • Recent: joint search and discovery interface • New: joint digitization of unique primary source materials

  7. Preparation • 2008 – TRLN white paper released, “Large- scale digitization: a TRLN Agenda” • 2009 – creation of a TRLN taskforce to explore funding for a planning grant • 2010-2011 – 1-year planning grant • 2011-2014 – 3-year digitization grant

  8. Piloting a sites of excellence model • NCSU – digitization of oversized materials • Duke – digitization of still images and manuscripts • UNC – digitization of audio and manuscripts • NCCU – qualitative program evaluation

  9. The challenges

  10. Management & communication

  11. Intellectual property strategy • One of the most ground-breaking aspects of CCC is that all materials are modern 20th century • 2011: TRLN working group authored “The Triangle Research Libraries Network’s Intellectual Property Strategy for Digitization of Modern Manuscript Collections and Archival Record Groups” • The strategy provides a well-reasoned risk management approach to large-scale digitization of modern manuscripts

  12. Shared standards and practices • Developed shared workflows for preparing, shipping, receiving, and scanningphysical materials, and delivering / verifying digital files • Good exercise in letting go of uniformity • Important lessons: documenting everything, create shared paperwork and tracking mechanisms

  13. Self evaluation responses: biggest challenges • Different levels of involvement by partners • Getting on the same page about what we are trying to accomplish • Accepting that we are working “near” each other; not “with” each other • Designing appropriate formal assessment • Constraints imposed by the language of the grant

  14. benefits

  15. For member institutions • Laid a groundwork for the future • Tested and proved our ability to collaborate closely in new areas • Increased publicityand visibility • Brought a new subset of consortial partner staff into the TRLN fold

  16. Biggest accomplishments in year 1? • 20%: digital production • 33%: collaboration, flexible partnerships, group planning, defining a shared scope

  17. For user communities • Making available an enormous quantity of 20th century civil rights primary sources that were previously inaccessible • Increased awareness of unique resources at other local institutions • Increased access to unique materials, regardless of institutional affiliation

  18. For peer library/archives communities • Our goal was to provide a proof of concept for collaborative large-scale digitization that others could learn from. All of our data, workflows, and findings will be available on our website: • Time and cost for our approach to each step of the process • Forms and paperwork • Workflows for transferring, preparing, scanning materials • Quantitative evaluation methodologies and results

  19. More • Joyce Chapman chapmajc@email.unc.edu • CCC project: www.trln.org/ccc • TRLN: www.trln.org

More Related