1 / 28

BASIC RATING PRINCIPLES

BASIC RATING PRINCIPLES. 38 CFR Part 4 Subpart A and B. GENERAL POLICY. 4.1 Essentials of evaluative rating Rating Schedule is a guide in evaluations Percentages represent average impairment in earning capacity

xander-freeman
Download Presentation

BASIC RATING PRINCIPLES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BASIC RATING PRINCIPLES 38 CFR Part 4 Subpart A and B

  2. GENERAL POLICY • 4.1 Essentials of evaluative rating • Rating Schedule is a guide in evaluations • Percentages represent average impairment in earning capacity • Degrees of disability are considered adequate to compensate for considerable loss of working time from exacerbations or illness • Each disability must be viewed in relation to history

  3. GENERAL POLICY • 4.2 Interpretation of examination reports • Different examiners use different language to describe same disability • Some features that have persisted unchanged may be overlooked • The whole recorded history must be considered • Each disability must be considered from point of view of working or seeking work • If there is no support of the findings, the RVSR must deem the examination as inadequate and return it

  4. GENERAL POLICY • 4.3 Resolution of reasonable doubt • Broad interpretation, consistent with the facts in each case. See 38 CFR 3.102 • 4.6 Evaluation of evidence • Assigning weight to evidence and balancing evidence for equitable and just decision • 4.7 Higher of two evaluations • Assign higher evaluation if more nearly approximating disability criteria

  5. GENERAL POLICY • 4.9 Congenital or developmental defects • Defects such as refractive error, personality disorder, mental deficiency, etc. are not subject to SC • 4.10 Functional Impairment • Examiner must describe full effect of disability on ordinary activity • 4.13 Effect of change of diagnosis • No change unless actual change occurs as opposed to difference in thoroughness or use of descriptive terms

  6. GENERAL POLICY • 4.14 Avoidance of pyramiding • Evaluating same disability under various diagnoses • 4.15 Total disability ratings • The ability to overcome handicap (disability) is based on average impairment in earning capacity upon the economic or industrial handicap to be overcome rather than individual success • 4.16 Total disability ratings for compensation based on unemployability of the individual • Schedular criteria and etiology of disability

  7. GENERAL POLICY • 4.17 Total disability ratings for pension based on unemployability and age • Same percentage requirements as 4.16 resulting in inability to secure and follow gainful employment • 4.17a Misconduct etiology • Coexistence of misconduct disability does not preclude P&T rating under 4.15, 4.16 and 4.17

  8. GENERAL POLICY • 4.18 Unemployability • Unemployed versus unemployable • 4.19 Age in service-connected claims • Age is not a factor in SC claims or an excuse in TDIU claims. Age will only be considered in NSC pension claims • 4.20 Analogous ratings • Unlisted condition rated based on closely related condition. Conjectural analogies will be avoided

  9. GENERAL POLICY • 4.21 Application of rating schedule • RS does not cover all findings of a disability. Residuals and impairment of function will be considered • 4.22 Rating of disabilities aggravated by active service • Degree of disability over and above level at entry • 4.23 Attitude of rating officers • READ THIS OFTEN AND REMIND THEM

  10. GENERAL POLICY • 4.24 Correspondence • All interpretations of the schedule , advisory opinions, lack of clarity or application directed to Director, C&P • 4.25 Combined ratings table • Average man 100% healthy and how each disability impacts him/her

  11. GENERAL POLICY • 4.26 Bilateral Factor • Paired Extremities • Paired Skeletal Muscles • Partial disability • Extra 10% added to combined total • 4.27 Use of diagnostic codes • Arbitrary numbers to show basis of evaluation assigned and for statistical purposes • ICD-9

  12. GENERAL POLICY • 4.28 Prestabilization rating from date of discharge from service • Unstabilized, unhealed or incompletely healed • 50% or 100% --- 6 months or one year • 4.29 Ratings for service-connected disabilities requiring hospital treatment or observation • In excess of 21 days of treatment for SCD • Consideration of authorized absences

  13. GENERAL POLICY • 4.30 Convalescent ratings • Surgery for SCD, immobilization by cast without surgery • Extensions beyond 3 months are possible • Convalescence greater than 30 days • 4.31 Zero percent evaluations • Absent the requirements for a 10%

  14. GENERAL POLICY • 4.40 Functional Loss • Inability, due to damage or infection, to perform normal working movements of the body; Evidence of disuse (atrophy)? • 4.41 History of injury • Determinations regarding trauma, congenital or developmental, or healed disease • 4.42 Complete medical examination of injury cases • General examinations and all specialist examinations when possible

  15. GENERAL POLICY • 4.43 Osteomyelitis • Once clinically identified, it must be viewed as a continuously disabling process • 4.44 The bones • Misalignment due to stress and malunion must be described • 4.45 The joints • Limited or loose motion, weakness, fatigue, pain and incoordination • Major and Minor joints for rating purposes

  16. GENERAL POLICY • 4.46 Accurate measurement • Length of stumps, location of scars, degree of muscle atrophy, use of goniometer to measure limitation of motion, unretouched pictures? • 4.55 Principles of combined ratings for muscle injuries • 23 muscle groups in 5 anatomical regions; muscle injury versus peripheral nerve; ankylosed joints; same and different anatomical regions

  17. GENERAL POLICY • 4.56 Evaluation of muscle disabilities • 4 classifications of muscle injuries • Nature of each wound • Objective description of each wound • Through-and-Through wounds • Compound comminuted fracture with muscle or tendon damage

  18. GENERAL POLICY • 4.57 Static foot deformities • Bilateral flatfoot (pes planus) as a congenital condition or as an acquired condition • 4.58 Arthritis due to strain • Extremity amputation or shortening causes strain on associated parts. These traumatic events are causative factors in developing arthritis • 4.59 Painful motion • Productive of disability, sciatic neuritis with spinal arthritis, entitlement to minimum compensable rating based on pain or instability or malalignment

  19. GENERAL POLICY • 4.61 Examination • Except for trauma, all examinations for arthritis should cover all major joints with special reference to Heberden’s or Haygarth’s nodes • 4.62 Circulatory disturbances • Circulatory disturbances of the lower extremity following injury to popliteal space is rated as phlebitis

  20. GENERAL POLICY • 4.63 Loss of use of hand or foot • No effective remaining function held to exist other than equally served by amputation • Extremely unfavorable complete ankylosis of knee or 2 joints of an extremity or shortening of 3 ½ inches or more • 4.64 Loss of use of both buttocks • Severe muscle damage to MG XVII Bilateral with inability to rise or maintain postural stability

  21. GENERAL POLICY • 4.66 Sacroiliac joint • Lumbosacral and sacroiliac joints considered as one anatomical segment • Arthritis most common disability • X-rays vital • Careful consideration of strain and pain or paralysis affecting discs • 4.67 Pelvic bones • Variability of residuals following fractures -- faulty posture, LOM, muscle injury, painful motion, spasm, neuritis, peripheral nerve injury and LOM hip

  22. GENERAL POLICY • 4.68 Amputation rule • Limited by elective amputation site • Painful neuroma of a stump shall be assigned evaluation for elective reamputation • 4.69 Dominant hand • Right or left determined by evidence of record or testing on VAE • Only one hand is dominant

  23. GENERAL POLICY • 4.70 Inadequate examination • If insufficient, request supplemental report with details as to limitation of ordinary activities, prognosis of return to and continuation of useful work • 4.71 Measurement of ankylosis and joint motion • Rating specialists must consider the normal motion described in Plates 1,2 and 3

  24. ASSIGNING THE CORRECT EVALUATION 38 CFR Part 4 Subpart B – Disability Ratings

  25. EVALUATION • Description of the Diagnosis • Identification of the Proper Diagnostic Code • Criteria “in-between” levels of disability

  26. EVALUATION • Importance of Pain (DeLuca) • Importance of Functional Loss • Consistency in Evaluative Judgment

  27. BODY SYSTEMS 38 CFR Part 4 Subpart B

  28. BODY SYSTEMS • 15 Specific Systems • Organized Chaos -- working knowledge of diagnostic codes very beneficial • Specific “rating rules” contained in footnotes

More Related