1 / 18

Elections, Participation and the Public

Elections, Participation and the Public. Considering Democracy July 15th 2013. Finding Democratic Legitimacy. Democratic ideal: “the ultimate source of political power is the people” Through free discussion and debate, decision made by more than 50% of ‘the people’

wynona
Download Presentation

Elections, Participation and the Public

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Elections, Participation and the Public Considering Democracy July 15th 2013

  2. Finding Democratic Legitimacy • Democratic ideal: “the ultimate source of political power is the people” • Through free discussion and debate, decision made by more than 50% of ‘the people’ • Reality, of course, is quite different • Lack of barriers to participation different than providing the tools to participate meaningfully • Review: • Direct democracy; Representative democracy • Elections and informed participation

  3. Elections! • Elections: expression of the people of whom should govern • Legitimacy: ‘degree to which citizens accept the actions…of government [and] state actors’ • Democratic Legitimacy • Turn out rates?

  4. Elections! Cont… • Holding governments account • rewards, punishments, alternatives • In a democracy, elections MUST be regular, competitive and effective • Competitive electoral systems require: • open franchise (no means testing) • freedom of assembly (political parties) • freedom from intimidation and violence • secret balloting • fairness

  5. What about Fairness? • Transparency • Equal access to media • Impartial Election Commission • Impartial Ballots • Transparent Ballot Counting • Protection of Polling Stations • Timely review of complaints • Timely announcement of Results • Fair coverage of results in media • Acceptance of outcomes

  6. Elections: What are they Good for? • Bottom-up view (positive): Opportunity for citizens to impact policy and the direction of the country • Top-Down view (negative): Opportunity for government to quiet dissent, legitimate an unresponsive political system • Middle view: An opportunity for party elites and citizens a venue to exchange ideas

  7. Functions of Elections • Choosing a government (sort of…) • Holding government to account (sometimes) • The election of representatives (but what do they represent?) • Substantive vs Descriptive Representation • Legitimacy (to a degree…) • Obeying vs dissent • Mandates (sometimes...) • Education and socialization (okay, I’ll give you that one…but…)

  8. Elections in the Media • Primary source of information for public • Concentration of ownership • ‘Horse race’ has become dominant style of coverage • Sound-byte politics • Image politics

  9. Free and Fair Sure, but what about Rules? • Electoral financing ‘rules • Canada – capped political donations, capped spending; parties and third party advertisers • US, less so (2002; 2010) • Limits derived from concept of ‘equity’ and fairness • Money = Speech/Expression? • Rep by Pop – seats in legislature equally divided across population • Equal weighting of votes • Gerrymandering and independent commissions

  10. Electoral Systems • Non-Proportional • FPTP (Canada, US, UK) • Majoritarian • Majority (France-President), Plurality (France – Leg), Alternative (Australia – House of Reps) • Proportional • List System (Israel) • STV (Ireland; Australia - Senate) • Mixed Systems • MMP (Germany, New Zealand)

  11. Primary Differences in Function and Outcomes • The primary goal of non-proportional system is to emphasize local candidate • Pluralities usually win • Vote % and seat % are not = • Wasted votes • Works best in 2 party system (own problems) • The primary goal of PR systems is to have a proportional outcome • vote % = seats % • Multi-member districts • Fewer wasted votes (thresholds) • Less focus on local (districts much larger) • Formula: total number of votes (+1) total number of seats +1

  12. Primary Differences in Function and Outcomes Cont… • The primary goal of Mixed Member Proportional systems are to emphasize the positives of both, while limiting negatives. • Local candidates • More proportionality • Fewer wasted votes • More parties • Regional emphasis too

  13. Three Voting Models • Why do people vote and why do they vote the way they do? • Sociological model • Socialization, political identity • Psycho-social model • Socialization, political identity • Party identity • Rational model • The rational evaluation of alternatives • Framing issues, irrational behaviour?

  14. Political Participation • Political Participation: “actions taken by individuals and groups in an attempt to influence political decisions and…decision-makers.” – O’Neill • High levels of participation are indicative of strong democracies • Types of participation: Individual, organizational, professional

  15. The Edge’s of Political Participation • Civil Disobedience • Blockades • Terrorism • Violence, FLQ • What is participation, though? • Voting? • Activism? • Local ethnocultural associations? • Talking politics?

  16. Least Shocking Statistics Ever! • The more work participation requires of citizens, the less likely they are to participate • In part, this can explain low American turnout • Important variables that impact participation, age, gender, class and political attitudes • Apathy, alienation • Putnam! • Nevitte: a shift in sites of political participation?

  17. How Much Political Participation do we want? • Some argue political disinterest is beneficial • Other argue a highly informed and interested electorate is best • Build tolerance, appreciation, rationality with informed participation • E-government and E-democracy a revolution in participation? • Wide spread access, potential for direct democracy? • Digital divide, Ageism, Classism, means testing? • Effective, informed participation?

  18. Direct Democracy • Few countries use direct democracy regularly, but many have some variants • Referendums/Plebiscites • States in the US, BC, Canada for Constitutional Matters, the EU for major Constitutional Matters • Initiative • BC, California • Recall • BC, California

More Related