Download
1 / 31
310 likes | 438 Views
This discussion evaluates the complex issue of cheating in online environments, focusing on both the perceived and real challenges faced by faculty, instructional designers, and administrators. It explores two primary approaches: the "search and destroy" method, which relies on technology to detect and punish cheating, and the "hearts and minds" strategy, aimed at fostering a community of ethical scholarship through engagement and education. By examining emerging solutions, we can better understand and address the various perceptions of cheating in online education.
E N D
1. Problem: cheating, spec. in online environnments, whether REAL or PERCIEVED
For: faculty, instructional designers, administrators who only care when cheating is reported
We’ll consider both approaches to dealing with cheating: “search and destroy” (seek cheating, use technology to expose, and punish), and “hearts and minds” (convince students of the value of real learning, the pointlessness/detractions of cheating, and foster a community [fuuuzzzzy] of ethical scholarship [gag])
Tackle the question of how we deal with cheating in online learning environments
We can learn something about perceptions and realities of online cheating by looking at emerging “solutions.”Problem: cheating, spec. in online environnments, whether REAL or PERCIEVED
For: faculty, instructional designers, administrators who only care when cheating is reported
We’ll consider both approaches to dealing with cheating: “search and destroy” (seek cheating, use technology to expose, and punish), and “hearts and minds” (convince students of the value of real learning, the pointlessness/detractions of cheating, and foster a community [fuuuzzzzy] of ethical scholarship [gag])
Tackle the question of how we deal with cheating in online learning environments
We can learn something about perceptions and realities of online cheating by looking at emerging “solutions.”
