1 / 27

Food and Nutrition Surveillance and Response in Emergencies

Food and Nutrition Surveillance and Response in Emergencies. Session 10 Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to Nutrition Situation Analysis. Introduction.

Download Presentation

Food and Nutrition Surveillance and Response in Emergencies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Food and Nutrition Surveillance and Response in Emergencies Session 10 Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to Nutrition Situation Analysis

  2. Introduction • Analysis of elements of food chain and their interactions needs to be done to understand the whole spectrum of food and nutrition security • Formulation of strategies and design of effective interventions require comprehensive assessments and cooperation of a variety of disciplines

  3. Introduction • Challenge is to create methodologies that are relevant, multi-disciplinary and comprehensive • Rapid Assessments are the new methodologies responsive to this challenge.

  4. What is a Rapid Assessment (RA)? • Has origin and application in rural development research and nutrition research • A systematic activity designed to draw inferences, conclusions, hypotheses or assessments including the acquisition of new information during a limited period of time.

  5. Characteristics of RA? • Offers the balance and interaction between (emic), local or indigenous perspective and the (etic), outside or experts perspectives from anthropological point of view • Pays attention to the cultural, traditional and social factors the target problems as well as knowledge of the beneficiaries.

  6. Characteristics of RA? • Procedures are primarily direct observations, informal conversations, key informant interviews concerned with knowledge, attitudes and practice

  7. How is RA Used? • To enhance the understanding of the rural conditions in their natural context • To tap knowledge of local inhabitants and combining the knowledge with modern scientific expertise BUT minimizing prior assumptions

  8. Qualitative Methods • Focus Group Discussions • Observations • Key Informants • Case Histories/Studies

  9. Focus Group Discussions What is FGD • A structured group process used to obtain detailed information about a particular situation Uses • For exploring attitudes and feelings • To draw out precise issues that may be unknown to the investigator

  10. Focus Group Discussions (FGD) Composition of FGD • 6-9 participants brought together to discuss a clearly defined topic • Composed of homogeneous people representing a particular segment of population (e.g. gender, age social group-pastoralists, internally displaced persons)

  11. Focus Group Discussions (FGD) Timing • A group session should last 1 to 1 and a half hours, maximum 2 hours. • Facilitator keeps discussion n track by asking a series of open ended questions to stimulate discussions

  12. Focus Group Discussions (FGD) Advantages • Easy to undertake • Results obtained in a short time • Social interactions in the group produces freer and more complex responses • The investigator can probe for clarification and solicit greater details

  13. Focus Group Discussions (FGD) Disadvantages • Groups are often difficult to assemble • Individual responses are not independent of each other • Group is hand selected therefore the results may not be representative of the general population

  14. Observation Observations generates questions for further investigations • Attendance at participation in activities, formal and informal • Structure counting (quantitative) observation yields useful preliminary information on physical features • Structures, sample (quantitative and qualitative)

  15. Observation • Transect. Offers an overview of the field site and structured observation on natural resource and human activity • Record who walked the transect and at what time • Helps build rapport with the locals

  16. Key Informant Interviews Obtaining information from a community resident who is in a position to know the community as a whole, or a particular area of interest. • The person can be a profession person who works with the population you want information about, or a member of the target population • Key informants can be young or old

  17. Key Informant Interviews Advantages • provides in-depth information about causes of the problem • Allows to clarify ideas and information on continual basis • Can easily combine with quantitative information

  18. Key Informant Interviews Disadvantages • Informants may give you their own impression and biases • May have to be combined with other methods, because achieving representativeness of the total community is difficult • May overlook the perspectives of community members who are less visible • The information may be difficult to quantify and organise

  19. Qualitative vs. Qualitative

  20. Qualitative vs. Qualitative

  21. Qualitative Methods Strengths • Provides vital information on attitudes and practice • Findings from qualitative research can be used to base qualitative research • Can easily combine with quantitative information

  22. Qualitative Methods Weaknesses • Small samples invalidates generalization of results • Non scientific-

  23. Quantitative Methods Strengths • Used to gather large amount of data • Features a high level of reliability • Findings can be tested using statistical means, helping one to be sure of its reliability

  24. Quantitative Methods Weaknesses • Rigid approach and attempts to control all the variable factors that might influence findings • Inappropriate to measure human knowledge attitude and practice • Insensitive to complexities of human interactions

  25. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods • Blending of methods captures a more complete, holistic and contextual portrayal of the subject under study. • Weakness and limitations of each method are counterbalanced therefore neutralizes rather than compounding the problems

  26. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods • Coding responses to open ended questions generated from quantitative enquiries. • Using statistical methods to analyse ranked data sets arising from participatory enquiries i.e. creating frequency tables from the coded data

  27. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods • Using participatory techniques in exploratory studies to set up hypotheses which can then be tested through questionnaire based sample surveys. • Choosing a random sample and conducting a questionnaire survey (quantitative) to gain information on key variables for in-depth qualitative survey

More Related