1 / 26

PSY 180

PSY 180. Lecture 4 Positive thinking. George Vaillant. Harvard longitudinal study of 3% of their students All WASPs, males Started in the 1930’s Most went to war and responded to a questionnaire asking to describe in own words the “difficult wartime experiences” he had encountered.

Download Presentation

PSY 180

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PSY 180 Lecture 4 Positive thinking

  2. George Vaillant • Harvard longitudinal study of 3% of their students • All WASPs, males • Started in the 1930’s • Most went to war and responded to a questionnaire asking to describe in own words the “difficult wartime experiences” he had encountered

  3. Peterson examined a random sample… • Looked at how they explained the causes of bad events throughout the war • Scored them for pervasiveness • Did they see the bad things as indicative of non changing flaws (possibly in himself too)? • “I hated the military…” – pessimist • Did they see the bad things distant from himself • “I was in danger in the military because I had no specific task assigned to me” – optimist

  4. What did they find? • Optimism predicted good health • Especially around age 40 and 45 (r =.37)

  5. Presidential election results • The more optimistic candidate won 18/23 times between 1900 and 1988 • Hasn’t predicted any since though- maybe because elections got word of these studies and now everyone tries to be optimistic….

  6. The Pollyanna Principle • In thought, we focus on the positive

  7. Support for the PP • Table 5.1 • Find a paper or two that goes into a few of these in detail…

  8. Selective attention to the negative • When something bad happens or has the potential to happen, our consciousness gets directed to it • Evolution has selected for people with these attributes • They will survive more than others • The default to the positive plays out on a nonconscious level according to the PP

  9. Optimism • A mood or attitude associated with an expectation about the social or material future- one for which the evaluator regards as socially desirable, to his or her advantage or for his or her pleasure • No objective definition because it depends on what the individual believes is desirable

  10. History of optimism • Is it human nature? • Sophocles and Nietzsche argued that it prolongs suffering- face reality will ya? • Freud believed that optimism was all over the place but leads to the denial of our instinctual nature and the denial or reality • Freud argued that religions sold the idea of optimism • “God will lead me through life and beyond”

  11. Freud continued • Optimism led to illusion • Psychodynamic ideas of Freud argued that a healthy person needs to see the world as it is without illusions • Thus by nature optimists are mentally unhealthy according to historical thought • “reality testing” was done to test for psychological problems • Must be realistic about the present and the future • Only modest expectations about the future would count as realistic

  12. Cognitive theorists • Began to show that negativity led to depression and that positivity led to psychologically healthy people • Taylor (1989) distinguished from optimism as an illusion vs optimism as a delusion • Illusions are responsive to reality • Delusions are not

  13. Evolutionary optimism • Maybe when we evolved the ability to think about the future, we needed something to counteract the fear and paralysis that accompanies thinking about death and mortality

  14. Optimism • Human nature? • Evolutionary approaches • Individual differences • The idea that everyone varies on the amount of optimism they have • We are not all simply evolutionarily optimists

  15. Dispositional optimism • Global expectation that good things will be plentiful and bad things scarce • Based on how people pursue goals • Aka “self-regulatory model” • In the face of adversity, do people believe their goals can still be achieved? • Measures using the Life Orientation task (LOT) • Has been linked to effective coping

  16. Explanatory style • How one explains the causes of bad events • External, unstable, and specific causes = optimism • Related to learned helplessness • Measured using • Attributional style questionairre • Hypothetical events are given, asked the provide the one major cause • Causes are then rated on internality, stability, and globility • Content analysis procedure • Aka CAVE • Uses written or spoken records which allows for long term studies

  17. Optimistic explanatory style • Related to good outcomes • One exception • They underestimate the likelihood of bad events • Internality is the weakest linked aspect of explanatory style

  18. LOT vs ASQ/CAVE • Correlate strongly • LOT is more expectations • CAVE and ASQ are focused on HOW goals are brought about • Focus on the process not just the end result like LOT

  19. Hope • 2 main aspects • Agency • A determination that goals can be achieved • Pathways • The belief that successful plans can be made to reach goals • Measured by a self-report scale

  20. Little vs Big Optimism • Little • Specific expectations in life • May be due to learning history • Like the explanatory style • Big • Less specific • Could be about the country as a whole • Could be biologically driven • Beneficial because it leads to vigor and resilience • Like hope and dispositional optimism • Could influence different aspects of health and well-being • Little- onset of injuries and diseases • Big- trajectory of severe illnesses

  21. Optimism vs pessimism • Seem to be independent of each other • Explanatory style for good events and bad events are independent of each other • Odd note: • Optimistic explanatory style is how one responds to bad events, not good ones • May involve the perception of bad events happening • Maybe they are measuring optimism wrong? • Optimists are currently defined as not depressed, not failing, not ill • Why the focus on the absence of bad things? • Where is the presence of good things?

  22. Typical learned helplessness expmt • Animals or people that are exposed to aversive events that they cannot control vs animals or people that are exposed to aversive events that they can control vs animals or people that are not exposed to aversive events • The last two groups do not differ • Experience with uncontrollable events provides no real benefit • Maybe optimism is the baseline unless there is a reason not to be optimistic?

  23. If the task gets difficult.. • Then having experience with aversive stimuli does matter • Learned hopefulness, learned industriousness, learned mastery, learned relevance, learned resourcefulness

  24. Unrealistic optimism • Most underestimate their risk of experiencing illness or injury • May not allow for the individual to properly prevent or plan for these things • Seligman proposed the idea of flexible or complex optimism • People should be optimistic when the future can be changed by positive thinking but not otherwise

  25. Religions and optimism • Religious texts that were more conservative were rated as more optimistic than liberal ones (Seligman 1993)

  26. Parents and optimism • Explanatory styles of parents and children converge • If optimism is lost…? • Cognitive behavioral therapy • Seeks to change the thoughts that accompany a pessimistic explanatory style to combat depression

More Related