1 / 53

The 3 genomic paradoxes

3c. The 3 genomic paradoxes. K. C. N. K -value paradox: Complexity does not correlate with chromosome number . Homo sapiens. Lysandra atlantica. Ophioglossum reticulatum. 46. 250. ~1260. 3.4  10 9 bp Homo sapiens. 6.8  10 11 bp Amoeba dubia. 1.5  10 10 bp Allium cepa .

wesley
Download Presentation

The 3 genomic paradoxes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 3c The 3 genomic paradoxes K C N

  2. K-value paradox: Complexity does not correlate with chromosome number. Homo sapiens Lysandra atlantica Ophioglossum reticulatum 46 250 ~1260

  3. 3.4  109 bp Homo sapiens 6.8  1011 bp Amoeba dubia 1.5  1010 bp Allium cepa C-value paradox: Complexity does not correlate with genome size.

  4. N-value paradox: Complexity does not correlate with gene number. ~21,000 genes ~25,000 genes ~60,000 genes

  5. Possible solutions:

  6. What is complexity?

  7. Solution 1 to the N-value paradox: Many protein-encoding genes produce more than one protein product (e.g., by alternative splicing or by RNA editing).

  8. RNA editing Alternative splicing

  9. The combinatorial use ofRNA editingand alternative splicingprobably causes the human proteometo be5-10 times largerthan that of Drosophila or Caenorhabditis.

  10. 959 cells 1,031 cells ~108 cells 13,600 genes 19,000 genes

  11. Solution 2 to the N-value paradox: We are counting the wrong things, we should count other genetic elements (e.g., smallRNAs).

  12. Solution 3to the N-value paradox: We should look at connectivity rather than at nodes.

  13. L. Mendoza and E. R. Alvarez-Buylla. 1998. Dynamics of the genetic regulatory network for Arabidopsis thaliana flower morphogenesis. J. Theor. Biol. 193:307-319.

  14. Solution 4to the N-value paradox: The numbers provided by the various genome annotations are wrong!

  15. Comparison of three databses Hogenesch JB, Ching KA, Batalov S, Su AI, Walker JR, Zhou Y, Kay SA, Schultz PG, & Cooke MP. 2001. A comparison of the Celera and Ensembl predicted gene sets reveals little overlap in novel genes. Cell 106:413-415.

  16. Range of C-values in various eukaryotic taxa _______________________________________________________________ Taxon Genome size range Ratio (Kb) (highest/lowest) _______________________________________________________________ Eukaryotes 2,300 - 686,000,000 298,261 Amoebae 35,300 - 686,000,000 19,433 Fungi 8,800 - 1,470,000 167 Animals 49,000 - 139,000,000 2,837 Sponges 49,000 - 53,900 1 Molluscs 421,000 - 5,290,000 13 Crustaceans 686,000 - 22,100,000 32 Insects 98,000 - 7,350,000 75 Bony fishes 340,000 - 139,000,000 409 Amphibians 931,000 - 84,300,000 91 Reptiles 1,230,000 - 5,340,000 4 Birds 1,670,000 - 2,250,000 1 Mammals 1,700,000 - 6,700,000 4 Plants 50,000 - 307,000,000 6,140 _______________________________________________________________

  17. If the variation in C-values is attributed to genes, it can be due to interspecific differences in (1) the number of protein-coding genes (2) the size of proteins (3) the size of protein-coding genes (4) the number and sizes of genes other than protein-coding ones.

  18. The number of protein-coding genes in eukaryotes is thought to vary over a 50-fold range. This variation is insufficient to explain the 300,000-fold variation in nuclear-DNA content.

  19. Thebiggerthe genome, thesmallerthe genic fraction

  20. Nongenic DNA is the sole culprit for the C-value paradox! 99.998%

  21. Genome increase: (1) global increases, i.e., the entire genome or a major part of it is duplicated (2) regional increases, i.e., a particular sequence is multiplied to generate repetitive DNA. MECHANISMS FOR GLOBAL INCREASES IN GENOME SIZE

  22. Polyploidization = the addition of one or more complete sets of chromosomes to the original set. An organism with an odd number of autosomes cannot undergo meiosis or reproduce sexually. Musa acuminata

  23. allopolyploidy

  24. Triticum urartu (AA) Aegilops speltoides (BB) T. turgidum (AABB) T. tauschii (DD) ` T. aestivum (AABBDD)

  25. autopolyploidy

  26. Following polyploidization, a very rapid process ofduplicate-geneloss ensues.

  27. Allohexaploid Triticum aestivum originated about 10,000 years ago. In this very short time, many of its triplicated loci have been silenced. The proportion of enzymes produced by triplicate, duplicate, and single loci is 57%, 25%, and 18%, respectively.

  28. During evolution autopolyploidy & allopolyploidy becomes cryptopolyploidy.

  29. Genome sizes in 80 grass species (Poaceae).

  30. It has been suggested that the emergence of vertebrates was made possible by two rounds of tetraploidization. Two cryptooctoploids?

  31. Does chromosome number increase due to polyploidy affect the phenotype? Chrysanthemum species have 9 to 90 chromosomes in haploid cells.

  32. 54 duplicated regions.

  33. 2 possible explanations: (1) the duplicated regions were formed independently by regional duplications occurring at different times. (2) the duplicated regions have been produced simultaneously by a single tetraploidization event, followed by genome rearrangement and loss of many redundant duplicates.

  34. 50/54 duplicated regions have maintained the same orientation with respect to the centromere. 54 independent regional duplications are expected to result in ~7 triplicated regions (i.e., duplicates of duplicates), but none was observed.

  35. Loss of 92% of the duplicate genes. Occurrence of 70-100 map disruptions.

  36. Arabidopsis thaliana: regional duplications

  37. What about polysomy?

  38. trisomy 21 Polysomy is usually deleterious.

  39. An exception?

  40. MAINTENANCE OF NONGENIC DNA: HYPOTHESES (1) The selectionist hypothesis. (2) The neutralist hypothesis (junk DNA). (3) The intragenomic selectionist hypothesis (selfish DNA). (4) The nucleotypic hypothesis.

  41. 3.5 3 log nuclear volume (mm3) 2.5 2 1 1.5 2 log DNA per cell () Correlation between nuclear volume and nuclear DNA content in apical meristem cells of 30 herbaceous species. Regression slope = 0.826 fitted by least squares.

  42. MAINTENANCE OF NONGENIC DNA: EVIDENCE (1) The selectionist hypothesis. (2) The neutralist hypothesis (junk DNA). (3) The intragenomic selectionist hypothesis (selfish DNA). (4) The nucleotypic hypothesis.

More Related