1 / 23

Floating Kelp Canopy Area -35% (2011-2012)

Floating Kelp Canopy Area -35% (2011-2012). Crescent Bay -23%. Angeles Point -67%. Dungeness Spit -15%. Tongue Pt – Observatory Pt -14%. Freshwater Bay -36%. Elwha Bluffs -78%. Ediz Hook -61%. Dungeness Bluffs -44%. After - 2012. Before - 2010.

wendi
Download Presentation

Floating Kelp Canopy Area -35% (2011-2012)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Floating Kelp Canopy Area-35% (2011-2012) Crescent Bay -23% Angeles Point -67% Dungeness Spit -15% Tongue Pt – Observatory Pt -14% Freshwater Bay -36% Elwha Bluffs -78% Ediz Hook -61% Dungeness Bluffs -44%

  2. After - 2012 Before - 2010 Directly east of the Elwha River mouth, -8 m (MLLW).

  3. Tran 1 .94 .06 .80 Tran 2 .80 .42 .48 Tran 3 .66 .40 Tran 4 .90 .48 1 2 Tran 5 3 .78 .64 5 4

  4. Other slides

  5. Changes in Kelp Near the Elwha River Preliminary Results After Dam 1989-2010 (DNR) Helen Berry DNR Nearshore Habitat Program

  6. Acknowledgements • 2010 underwater videography • Cathy Lear, Clallam County • Jim Norris, Marine Resource Consultants • Floating kelp data collection and mapping • Bob VanWagenon, Ecoscan • Discussion • Tom Mumford, Marine Agronomics

  7. Final EIS prediction… From the U.S. Department of the Interior. 2006. Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration Final Environmental Impact Statement. http://www.nps.gov/olym/naturescience/upload/ElwhaFinalEIS2.pdf

  8. Impacts of Sedimentation on Kelp • Burial/Scour • Damages living plants, decreases hard substrate availability • Silt • Prevents adhesion of gametophytes • Water column turbidity • Decreases available light

  9. Kelp = Large Brown Algae in the Order Laminariales, Phylum Ochrophyta (Phaeophyta) Floating or Canopy-forming Source: Mumford (2007) Kelp and Eelgrass in Puget Sound

  10. Kelp = Large Brown Algae in the Order Laminariales, Phylum Ochrophyta (Phaeophyta) Jim Norris Stipitate Sandra Lindstrom Source: Mumford (2007) Kelp and Eelgrass in Puget Sound

  11. Kelp = Large Brown Algae in the Order Laminariales, Phylum Ochrophyta (Phaeophyta) Prostrate Source: Mumford (2007) Kelp and Eelgrass in Puget Sound

  12. Kelp = Large Brown Algae in the Order Laminariales, Phylum Ochrophyta (Phaeophyta) Source: Mumford (2007) Kelp and Eelgrass in Puget Sound

  13. Floating Kelp Monitoring Methods (Since 1989) Near-vertical aerial photography collected from small plane during a late summer low tide (7500’ MSL) with Nikon D200 digital 35mm DSLR camera. Hand delineated onto 1:12K basemaps

  14. Floating Kelp Canopy Area: WA Outer Coast and Strait of Juan De Fuca Slope = 61.5 ha/yr P-value = 0.0002 Canopy Area (hectares) Slope = 34.9 ha/yr P-value = 0.03 Slope = 25.1 ha/yr P-value = 0.0005

  15. Floating Kelp Canopy Area: WA Outer Coast and Strait of Juan De Fuca Hectares El Niño-Warm Dry- low upwelling Climate Index La Niña- Cold Wet Canopy Area (Hectares) DNR’s Nearshore Monitoring Program

  16. Trends in Kelp Canopy Area by Section (1989-2010) Eastern Strait – comparatively little kelp, fewest increasing sections, predominantly Nereocystis. Western Strait – most increasing sections, most kelp area overall, most consistent year-to-year. Outer Coast – increasing in many sections, extremes in year-to-year changes.

  17. Elwha River Canopy-forming Kelp Before Dam Construction 1912 (Rigg) Pre-dam (1911-1912) After Dam Construction 1989-2010 (DNR) Present (1989-2004)

  18. Towed Underwater Videography of Submerged Vegetation

  19. Transects Surveyed in 2010 (before)* and 2012 (after) - shallow subtidal to -15 m * Thanks to Clallam County (Cathy Lear) and MRC (Jim Norris) for this imagery.

  20. Classification Categories • Vegetation Types • All macrovegetation • Stipitate kelp • Prostrate kelp • Floating kelp • Non-kelp red/brown algae • Green algae • Seagrass • Cover classes • Low <33% • Medium 33-66% • High > 66% Caveats: multiple canopies, what’s ‘living’?, more cover categories would be nice. Mapping Unit ~ 1 m2

  21. 1.0 .82 .99 .94 1 1.0 .97 2 1.0 1.0 3 .95 .88 1 4 2 3 .99 .97 5 4 5

  22. .66 .36 .40 .50 .27 .30 .27 .25 .23 .17 1 2 3 .38 5 .30 4

  23. Next Steps • More data analysis to characterize changes in kelp (comparison across areas and depth ranges). • Next round of data collection in late summer 2013.

More Related