1 / 9

EEA Workshop Water Resource Efficiency Copenhagen 16-17.06.2011

Water Resource Efficiency: proposal for a decision matrix. Flemish Environment Agency A. Van de Maelestraat 96 B-9320 Erembodegem Belgium Rudy Vannevel ( r.vannevel@vmm.be). EEA Workshop Water Resource Efficiency Copenhagen 16-17.06.2011. Challenges ResEff.

watson
Download Presentation

EEA Workshop Water Resource Efficiency Copenhagen 16-17.06.2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Water Resource Efficiency: proposal for a decision matrix Flemish Environment Agency A. Van de Maelestraat 96 B-9320 Erembodegem Belgium Rudy Vannevel (r.vannevel@vmm.be) EEA Workshop Water Resource Efficiency Copenhagen 16-17.06.2011

  2. Challenges ResEff • How to be effective in decision-making? • How to relate Environmental Analysis & Policy (application & development)?

  3. ResEff. Agriculture (BE-FL) (volumes in mio m³/y) P. Precipitation Indicator: sustainable w.use S. Agriculture (Production:….) P. Precipitation (Graph. trend 1990-2010) RH. Harvested rainwater (Graph. trend ) RH. Harvested Rainwater Potential: 0.8 m³/m²/y WU. Agriculture (Graph. trend 2005-2008) SW. Total Water stress 25 % L. Land WU. Water Use 100% = 48.2 1480 applied W.saving techniques 113 applied WWT techniques 4 % SW. Surface water 1.5 % Arable farming 38 % Impact sector on SW 3.3 % Vegetables (open air) 28 % 1.0 % Fruit (open air) 39 % 12 % 18.3 % Vegetables + fruit (greenhouse) 67 % DW. Drinking water 18.0 % Ornamental plant cultivation 62 % 19 % 15.3 % Dairy cattle GW. Groundwater 6.4 % Meat cattle 25 % 16 % 22 % 17.4 % Pigs GW. ‘Superficial’ 22 % 20.7 % Other farms GW. Deep layers 40 % Indicator. Sustainable water use [= Σ (RH, SW, GWsup) / Total] GW. Total Water stress Impact sector on GW

  4. ResEff. NV CB (BE-FL, 2011) (volumes in mio m³/y) IP. Industrial plant CB (Production: 100.000 t/y citric acid) P. Precipitation GW. Ground water L. Land Costs. Private investment Costs. Subsidies FL gov. WAb. Abstraction CB ≤ 2010 / WAb. Other IPs UWWTP. Tienen Costs. Total costs / 2011 ≥ WAb. Cooling WReU. Cooling Other sources Drinking water: Products: Brownfield sanit.: 2010: ≤ 2010 / 2010: SW treatment Wprocess. Production Wprocess. Cooling Loss: Loss: IWWTP. CB IWWTP. CB SW. Surface water E! WW treatment Effluent cooling

  5. ResEff. NV CB (BE-FL, 2011) (volumes in mio m³/y) GW. Total Water stress SoE effect of regulation Response effect of regulation Return of investment Policy instrument : subsidies Env Impact./Res. Indic. Policy indic. IP. Industrial plant CB (Production: 100.000 t/y citric acid) GW. Abstractions (Graph. trend 1994-2010) P. Precipitation 733 mm/y GW. levies (Graph. trend 1992-2010) Applic. Regulating abstraction levies? (Y) GW. Ground water Status: vulnerable GW level: # m L. Land GW. Abstraction CB (Graph. trend 1992-2010) Costs. Private investment 40 % = # mio € Costs. Subsidies FL gov. 60% = # mio € WAb. Abstraction CB Permit ≤ 2010: 3.7 Cooling Permit ≥ 2009: 0.8 Process ≤ 2010 / < 2010: 1.7 2010: 0.45 2011: 0.0 WAb. Other IPs > 0.5 UWWTP. Tienen Capac. 26.100 i.e Q effluent: 3.2 Costs. Total costs 1.1 mio € Impact IP on GW / 2011 ≥ 2010: 0.8 2011: 1.7 WAb. Cooling 2010: 1.2 2011: 1.7 WReU. Cooling 2010: 1.0 2011: 1.0 Other sources Drinking water: 0.03 Products: 0.03 Brownfield sanit.: 0.40 2010: 2.4 ≤ 2010 / 2010: 0.50 2010: 0.47 SW treatment Re-used WW SW. Total Water stress Wprocess. Production 2010: 0.97 Wprocess. Cooling 2010: 2.2 SW. Flows (Graph. Flow trend 1994-2009 in m³/y) Loss 2010: 0.18 Loss 2010: 0.02 IWWTP. CB 2010: 0.76 IWWTP. CB 2010: 2.2 SW. Surface water > 3.5 Impact on other resources Impact IP on SW E! WW treatment Effluent cooling

  6. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Policy & Management Instruments Water Chain-System (Sectoral analysis, w.Qnt & W.Qlt, Disturbances, Spatial assessments) Table EnvAn. Environmental Analysis Governance: current P&M EU Dir: WFD D P S I R Thematic (EUR) P-S, Morphological alterations, W.Use, WWT Geographic (EUR) Coastal Wbs, Vulnerable areas, Transboundary Wbs REPORT CONTENT: SoWater 2012 / Blueprint 2012 DPSIR Disturbances (EUR) Eutrophication, Sediments, Biodiversity, Recreation, Health Country examples (BE-FL) Sediment Qlt, Manure Action Plan, Invasive spp, Fish migration, Over-pumping dune areas Reporting Indicators, information, data & information gaps,… Governance: new P&M ES services, W.accounting, CC, Resource efficiency, health & sanitation, biodiversity,… POLICY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORKS DPSIR Governance CAPs ESs EIC PLAN CONTENT Resource Efficiency Table ResEff. Resource Efficiency Policy options

  7. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS – Resource Efficiency Policy & Management Instruments Water Chain-System > Sectoral analysis > Energy Governance: current P&M ?? D P S DPSIR I R Reporting ?? Governance: new P&M

  8. POLICY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORKS DPSIR Governance CAPs ESs EIC Resource Efficiency Policy options

  9. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Policy & Management Instruments Water Chain-System Governance: current P&M D P S I R Table EnvAn. Environmental Analysis REPORT CONTENT DPSIR Policy evaluations Thematic assessments Reporting Assessments & outlooks Governance: new P&M P&M topics POLICY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORKS Table ResEff. Resource Efficiency DPSIR Governance CAPs ESs EIC PLAN CONTENT P&M topics Actions Policy options Implementation

More Related