1 / 15

Preferential Employer Assisted Hsng + Low Income Upward Mobility

Preferential Employer Assisted Hsng + Low Income Upward Mobility. The most cost-effective suburban traffic reduction policy. A  B (swap) Improvement on Employer Assisted Housing (purchase subsidy, etc) Acronym: PEAH+LIUM. (helium). Co-Location.

washi
Download Presentation

Preferential Employer Assisted Hsng + Low Income Upward Mobility

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Preferential Employer Assisted Hsng + Low Income Upward Mobility • The most cost-effective suburban traffic reduction policy. A  B (swap) • Improvement on Employer Assisted Housing (purchase subsidy, etc) • Acronym: PEAH+LIUM. (helium).

  2. Co-Location • Influence “good” location decisions  “co-locate” job & home (walk to work). • Minimize SOV mileage. For each human, minimize the distances in the triangle below. Job <==> Home equals 7,500 miles per year. Job Home Activities

  3. 3 Steps for Housing Preference • 1) a city agrees to a preference scheme designating: • a) qualifications for entering households to achieve preferred status and • b) financial incentives for developers who adopt such schemes • 2) applicable rental/for-sale housing units are priced to ensure high demand (must have a waiting list) • 3) preferred people are granted priority for those housing units • “Handcuffs” incent continued co-location • NOT: teacher / police preference • INSTEAD IT IS: “commute impact.”

  4. PEAH for Suburban Office Parks • Best: Suburbs w/ congestion + expensive housing • Potential: 1M new condos and apts in largest 200 office parks. (jobs/hsng) • Private sector: density bonus, reduced pkng, small units.

  5. Most cost-effective congestion reduction • Tumlin: “most cost-effective peak hour trip reduction: provide housing for workers.” GUP: 0 new net trips • Cross-disciplinary topic, so tricky when dealing with “housing-only” or “transportation-only” specialists • Anthony Downs (Still Stuck in Traffic): a) learn to cope with traffic congestion in the short run, b) in the long run, jobs and housing will eventually co-locate • Cervero: co-location hasn’t been happening. "Average journey to work distance has been increasing, jobs/hsng continues to exacerbate" • Thus, co-location is crucial, and PEAH is needed.

  6. Win4 – cities, workers, employers, developers • Decrease commute time, emissions, auto mileage, gas use • Allow workers to walk and bike to work • Reduce the cost of living for co-located folks via reduced auto costs. Note also that location efficient mortgages are enabled • Reduce regional pressure to grow outside the inner-ring. • Increase the profitability of in-fill development by reducing mitigation fees and parking construction costs • Enable land-constrained cities to meet state mandated "fair share" housing production goals • Reduce employee turnover by providing better quality of life because of more free time caused by shorter commutes • Employee retention economics: Turnover is 20% to 50% per year. $100K to replace a tech worker (headhunter, job training, lost productivity, time spent interviewing). 20K workers per big office park. 1% of workers = 200. Reduce turnover by 1% = $20M • Improve areas afflicted with jobs/housing imbalance.

  7. PEAH Implementation: Handcuffs, etc. • Gate: good commute hurdle to enter housing • Tiered preference: 1 mi commute, 2 mi, 3 mi, non-SOV • Handcuffs. Monthly $100 price Δ between good and bad commutes. Condo assn fees or personal commute mitigation tax • Stanford West Apts: annual re-qualification with eviction for bad commutes • Condo deed restriction to re-sell to good commuter.

  8. ??? Give the “Haves” a break ??? • Two tier suburban society. Educated folks => high income. Historical discrimination and segregation • Hsng affordability crisis  increased segregation • Katrina: third world city in first world country • Silicon Valley: Haves: white & Asian, HaveNots: Latino (growing) & African American • CA Guv: “each community should house its own” • Must mitigate. Is inclusionary zoning / affordable housing production sufficient? (> 5K DUs?) • LIUM should be added: {package deal: job, home, job training, better schools for kids, more family time.} Boost up the ladder • Not just “sink or swim.”

  9. LIUM {package} details • ZERO suburban hsng affirmative action programs • U MI law school admissions: {disadvantaged background, low income, race/ethnicity, etc} • Targeted marketing to low income communities • WELCOMING: Latino themed architecture. Buttress grocery ethnic sections. Latino-serving first floor retail & community services. Cultural events • Employer coalition: job placement & mentoring • Temps, contractors, & “first floor” jobs count too • Employer pays LIUM $ to reserve PEAH DUs • I Have a Dream Foundation, after school programs • Pilot projects with measurement & mid-course adjustments. Propagate effective programs & set measurable goals • Employees volunteer (within walking distance).

  10. Economic theory • Bad location decision creates “negative economic externality” for society. PEAH “internalizes” the cost, creates a more efficient housing market • Reduced labor mobility (but that’s exactly the point for employers: increased employee retention)

  11. 1M DUs - Thumbs up/down? • Feasible or implementation issues? • How will schools be funded? • Will it pencil out? • Will NIMBY’s resist? • Good idea or bad idea? • Are handcuffs, etc objectionable?.

  12. END PEAH+LIUM • Active research project • Upcoming “roundtables” in Bay Area and DC • Hopefully in SoCal at some point.

  13. Culture: Low Mileage Community • Non auto-centric culture • Good Samaritan-ism (make it easy. Comes out in TDM interviews) • EBay’s online community phenomenon • Make friends, achieve social status • Self polices bad behavior.

  14. Low Mileage Scheme • New 100 DU residential complex • Everyone signs low mileage pledge • Entry condition • Manufacture a tipping point – it’s cool to be green • Currently, it’s often dumb to be green • Peer pressure • Problem-solving think tank. Online & in person • Carpool to grocery store • Ex: Biking learning curve: route, gear, defensive • People love to share such self-discovered expertise • Delivery services, etc.

  15. END Culture. Not covered: • Superblock transformation into new urbanist, walkable with PRT to span arterials • Bowling alone • Small murphy bed housing • Gated, automated, paid smart parking • grocery carts shopping • Homeless • Evil office facilities managers • Kitchen sink: green construction, gray water recycling, etc..

More Related