1 / 36

Superconductivity

Dept of Phys. M.C. Chang. Superconductivity. Introduction Thermal properties Magnetic properties London theory of the Meissner effect Microscopic (BCS) theory Flux quantization Quantum tunneling. Au. ρ. Hg. T. A brief history of low temperature ( Ref: 絕對零度的探索 ).

walteryoung
Download Presentation

Superconductivity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dept of Phys M.C. Chang Superconductivity • Introduction • Thermal properties • Magnetic properties • London theory of the Meissner effect • Microscopic (BCS) theory • Flux quantization • Quantum tunneling

  2. Au ρ Hg T A brief history of low temperature (Ref: 絕對零度的探索) • 1800 Charles and Gay-Lusac (from P-T relationship) proposed that the lowest temperature is -273 C (= 0 K) • 1877 Cailletet and Pictet liquified Oxygen (-183 C or 90 K) • soon after, Nitrogen (77 K) is liquified • 1898 Dewar liquified Hydrogen (20 K) • 1908 Onnes liquified Helium (4.2 K) G. Amontons 1700 • 1911 Onnes measured the resistance of metal at such a low T. To remove residual resistance, he chose mercury. Near 4 K, the resistance drops to 0. ρR ρR 1913

  3. 0.03K 1.14K 1.09K 0.39K 5.38K 0.88K 0.0003K 7.77K 3.72K 3.40K 0.92K 0.51K 0.56K 9.50K 0.55K 4.88K 0.12K 4.48K 0.01K 1.4K 0.14K 2.39K 7.19K 0.66K 4.15K 0.20K 0.60K 1.37K 1.4K Tc's given are for bulk, except for Palladium, which has been irradiated with He+ ions, Chromium as a thin film, and Platinum as a compacted powder http://superconductors.org/Type1.htm

  4. Superconductivity in alloys and oxides HgBa2Ca2Cu3O9 (under pressure) 160 140 HgBa2Ca2Cu3O9 TlBaCaCuO 120 BiCaSrCuO 100 YBa2Cu3O7 Superconducting transition temperature (K) 80 60 40 (LaBa)CuO Nb3Ge Nb3Sn NbN 20 NbC Nb Pb Hg V3Si 1910 1930 1950 1970 1990 Applications of superconductor • powerful magnet • MRI, LHC... • magnetic levitation • SQUID (超導量子干涉儀) • detect tiny magnetic field • quantum bits • lossless powerline • … Liquid Nitrogen temperature (77K) Bednorz Muller 1987 From Cywinski’s lecture note

  5. Introduction • Thermal properties • Magnetic properties • London theory of the Meissner effect • Microscopic (BCS) theory • Flux quantization • Quantum tunneling

  6. Thermal properties of SC: specific heat The exponential dependence with T is called “activation” behavior and implies the existence of an energy gapabove Fermi surface. Δ~ 0.1-1 meV (10-4~-5 EF)

  7. Connection between energy gap and Tc • Temperature dependence of Δ (obtained from Tunneling) Universal behavior of Δ(T) ‘s scale with different Tc’s 2(0) ~ 3.5 kBTc

  8. Entropy Al Less entropy in SC state: more ordering • free energy Al FN-FS = Condensation energy ～10-8 eV per electron! 2nd order phase transition

  9. More evidences of energy gap • Electron tunneling • EM wave absorption 2 suggests excitations created in “e-h” pairs

  10. Magnetic property of the superconductor • Superconductivity is destroyed by a strong magnetic field.Hc for metal is of the order of 0.1 Tesla or less. • Temperature dependence of Hc(T) All curves can be collapsed onto a similar curve after re-scaling. normal sc

  11. Hi Radius, a Current Magnetic field Critical currents (no applied field) so The critical current density of a long thin wire is therefore (thinner wire has larger Jc) From Cywinski’s lecture note jc~108A/cm2 for Hc=500 Oe, a=500 A • Jc has a similar temperature dependence as Hc, and Tc is similarly lowered as J increases. Cross-section through a niobium–tin cable Phys World, Apr 2011

  12. Meissner effect (Meissner and Ochsenfeld, 1933) A SC is more than a perfect conductor Lenz law not only dB/dt=0 but also B=0! Perfect diamagnetism different same

  13. Superconductingalloy: type II SC partial exclusion and remains superconducting at high B (1935) (also called intermediate/mixed/vortex/Shubnikov state) STM image NbSe2, 1T, 1.8K pure In • HC2 is of the order of 10~100 Tesla (called hard, or type II, superconductor)

  14. Lead + (A) 0%, (B) 2.08%, (C) 8.23%, (D) 20.4% Indium Areas below the curves (=condensation energy) remain the same! Hc2 Condensation energy(for type I) Comparison between type I and type II superconductors B=H+4πM (Magnetic energy density)

  15. Introduction • Thermal properties • Magnetic properties • London theory of the Meissner effect • Microscopic (BCS) theory • Flux quantization • Quantum tunneling

  16. nn Carrier density Tc T London theory of the Meissner effect(Fritz London and Heinz London, 1934) Two-fluid model: ns • Superfluid density ns =  • Normal fluid density nn Assume like free charges London proposed where It can be shown that ▽ψ=0 for simply connected sample (See Schrieffer)

  17. Temperature dependence of λL tin Predicted λL(0)=340 A, measured 510 A • Higher T, smaller nS • Penetration length λL Outside the SC, B=B(x) z (expulsion of magnetic field) also decays

  18. ns surface 0 superconductor x Coherence length ξ0(Pippard, 1939) • In fact, ns cannot remain uniform near a surface. The length it takes for ns to drop from full value to 0 is called 0 • Microscopically it’s related to the range of the Cooper pair. • The pair wave function (with range 0) is a superposition of one-electron states with energies within Δof EF(A+M, p.742). Energy uncertainty of a Cooper pair • Therefore, the spatial range of the variation of nS 0 ~ 1 μm >> λ for type I SC

  19. Penetration depth, correlation length, and surface energy Type I superconductivity Type II superconductivity • 0 > , surface energy is positive • 0 < , surface energy isnegative From Cywinski’s lecture note • smaller λ, cost more energy to expel the magnetic field. • smaller ξ0, get more “negative” condensation energy. • When ξ0 >>λ (type I), there is a net positive surface energy. Difficult to create an interface. • When ξ0 <<λ (type II), the surface energy is negative. Interface may spontaneously appear.

  20. H 0 Hc1 Hc2 -M 2003 Vortex state of type II superconductor(Abrikosov, 1957) Normal core • the magnetic flux  in a vortex is always quantized (discussed later). • the vortices repel each other slightly. • the vortices prefer to form a triangular lattice (Abrikosov lattice). isc • the vortices can move and dissipate energy (unless pinned by impurity ← Flux pinning) From Cywinski’s lecture note

  21. Estimation of Hc1 and Hc2 (type II) • Near Hc1, there begins with a single vortex with flux quantum 0, therefore • Near Hc2, vortex are as closely packed as the coherence length allows, therefore Typical values, for Nb3Sn, ξ0～ 34 A, λL～ 1600 A

  22. mercury Origin of superconductivity? • Metal X can (cannot) superconduct because its atoms can (cannot) superconduct? Neither Au nor Bi is superconductor, but alloy Au2Bi is! White tin can, grey tin cannot!(the only difference is lattice structure) • good normal conductors (Cu, Ag, Au) are bad superconductor; • bad normal conductors are good superconductors, why? • What leads to the superconducting gap? • Failed attempts: polaron, CDW... • Isotope effect(1950): It is found that Tc =const ×M-α α～ 1/2 for different materials lattice vibration?

  23. 1956 Cooper pair: attractive interaction between electrons (with the help of crystal vibrations) near the FS forms a bound state. • 1957 Bardeen, Cooper, Schrieffer: BCS theory 1972 • Microscopic wave function for the condensation of Cooper pairs. Ref: 1972 Nobel lectures by Bardeen, Cooper, and Schrieffer Brief history of the theories of superconductors • 1935 London: superconductivity is a quantum phenomenon on a macroscopic scale. There is a “rigid” (due to the energy gap) superconducting wave function Ψ. • 1950 2003 • Frohlich: electron-phonon interaction maybe crucial. • Reynolds et al, Maxwell: isotope effect • Ginzburg-Landau theory: ρScan be varied in space. Suggested the connection and wrote down the eq. for order parameter Ψ(r) (App. I)

  24. +++ e Dynamic electron-lattice interaction → Cooper pair ～1 μm Effective attractive interaction between 2 electrons (sometimes called overscreening) (range of a Cooper pair; coherence length)

  25. 2(0) ~ 3.5 kBTc • These pairs (similar to bosons) are highly correlated and form a macroscopic condensate state with (BCS result) (～upper limit of Tc) Cooper pair, and BCS prediction • 2 electrons with opposite momenta (p↑,-p↓) can form a bound state with binding energy (the spin is opposite by Pauli principle) • Fraction of electrons involved～ kTc/EF～ 10-4 • Average spacing between condensate electrons ～ 10 nm • Therefore, within the volume occupied by the Cooper pair, there are approximately (1μm/10 nm)3～ 106 other pairs.

  26. Energy gap and Density of states D(E) ~ O(1) meV • Electrons within kTC of the FS have their energy lowered by the order of kTC during the condensation. • On the average, energy difference (due to SC transition) per electron is

  27. Families of superconductors Cuperate (iron-based) T.C. Ozawa 2008 Conventional BCS Heavy fermion F. Steglich 1978 wiki

  28. Introduction • Thermal properties • Magnetic properties • London theory of the Meissner effect • Microscopic (BCS) theory • Flux quantization • Quantum tunneling (Josephson effect, SQUID)

  29. Inside a ring • 0～the flux of the Earth's magnetic field through a human red blood cell (~ 7 microns) Flux quantization in a superconducting ring (F. London 1948 with a factor of 2 error, Byers and Yang, also Brenig, 1961) • Current density operator • SC, in the presence of B London eq. with

  30. Single particle tunneling(Giaever, 1960) • SIN dI/dV 20-30 A thick • SIS For T>0 (Tinkham, p.77) Ref: Giaever’s 1973 Nobel prize lecture

  31. 1973 Josephson effect(Cooper pair tunneling) Josephson, 1962 1) DC effect: There is a DC current through SIS in the absence of voltage. Giaever tunneling Josephson tunneling

  32. 2) AC Josephson effect Apply a DC voltage, then there is a rf current oscillation. (see Kittel, p.290 for an alternative derivation) • An AC supercurrent of Cooper pairs with freq. ν=2eV/h, a weak microwave is generated. • ν can be measuredvery accurately, so tiny ΔV as small as 10-15 V can be detected. • Also, since V can be measured with accuracy about 1 part in 1010, so 2e/h can be measured accurately. • JJ-based voltage standard (1990): 1 V ≡ the voltage that produces ν=483,597.9 GHz (exact) • advantage: independent of material, lab, time (similar to the quantum Hall standard).

  33. 3) DC+AC:Apply a DC+ rf voltage, then there is a DC current • Another way of providing a voltage standard Shapiro steps (1963) given I, measure V

  34. The current of a SQUID with area 1 cm2 could change from max to min by a tiny H=10-7 gauss! For junction with finite thickness SQUID(Superconducting QUantum Interference Device)

  35. SuperConducting Magnet Non-destructive testing MCG, magnetocardiography MEG, magnetoencephlography

  36. Super-sentitive photon detector Transition edge sensor semiconductor detector superconductor detector 科學人,2006年12月

More Related