1 / 11

Governance for LC Detectors F. Richard LAL/Orsay

Governance for LC Detectors F. Richard LAL/Orsay. Introduction. The very large and worldwide community working on Detectors & Phenomenology is organized through the Research Directorate and the World-Wide-Study WWS

walterwhite
Download Presentation

Governance for LC Detectors F. Richard LAL/Orsay

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Governance for LC Detectors F. Richard LAL/Orsay F. Richard LAL/Orsay

  2. Introduction • The very large and worldwide community working on Detectors & Phenomenology is organized through the Research Directorate and the World-Wide-Study WWS • This new organisation set under S. Yamada has re-created the WWS panels (R&D, MDI, Software etc…) in consultation with the LoIs • The WWS organises the regional and international workshops and has now a new mission: to connect the community to the RD, the GDE & ILCSC • Here I will discuss some remaining issues not settled within the new organisation, of relevance in Europe F. Richard LAL/Orsay

  3. The frame structure of the RDmanagement Executive Board Research Director Regional contacts IDAG Detector Design Groups (or LOI groups) (A,B,C) Physics and Experiment Board RD + RC Representatives of Detector Design Groups Representatives of the Common Task Groups Common Task Groups Machine Detector Interface Engineering Tools Det. R&D Panel Software Panel Physics Panel F. Richard LAL/Orsay

  4. Coordination of the R&D effort • Contrary to GDE, the RD has no direct authority on the many R&D collaborations • The largest is CALICE which works on calorimetry R&D, the major cost component of these detectors with the magnet: 300 physicists from 50 institutes from the 3 regions • Use of test beams all over the world (DESY, KeK, CERN, FNAL…) insures some level of coordination • External Reviewers of the R&D panel of the WWS have recognized the pertinence of this R&D but much more needs to come before definite choices can be done on the various technologies needed in the 3 concepts which have been proposed for ILC F. Richard LAL/Orsay

  5. Monitoring R&D ? • Without a world lab the monitoring of these collaborations is de-centralized with risks of duplication and/or of inadequate priorities • The present trend (US-UK) towards ‘generic’ R&D makes it even more difficult to define priorities • In Europe the DESY PRC has played up to know a loose but useful role of coordination (international membership of PRC helps) F. Richard LAL/Orsay

  6. Special role of Europe • EU has by far the largest resources and we therefore need to have a careful governance of these resources • From Ch. Damerell et al 2005 3/5 years budget (3 for expensive parts) • The total effort represents 31 M$/year 75% being manpower • 50% of this effort is in Europe F. Richard LAL/Orsay

  7. UE contracts • EUDET has been successful but it was 100% ILC • Devdet organized under ECFA has failed in 2008 • Many (too?) players: super-B, neutrinos, SLHC, CLIC, ILC… • No clear system to set priorities • Next call end 2009 • Not clear how things will get better organized although better ILC-CLIC connections may help F. Richard LAL/Orsay

  8. Recent evolutions • CLIC-ILC just starting common work on detectors • Pertinence of ILC concepts for CLIC (to be confirmed) • There are LHCC-CERN R&D initiatives on µvertexing (RD52 planned by Ch. Damerell et al) and Micro Pattern Gas Detectors Technologies (RD51) • New ‘Si-3D’ technology (vertically integrated pixel detectors) appears as an R&D starting fast (FNAL) which could bring together SLHC and LC efforts • It might be useful to review (ECFA ?) the situation and decide which strategy should be followed for common interest • Role of CERN for the LC to be defined with the new management F. Richard LAL/Orsay

  9. What to do ? • Plenty to be done to organize the large ILC European community working on R&D • These aspects could be discussed perhaps within ELCSG is this body gets revived • As pointed out to ELCSG in Feb 2005: • The role of DRDC at CERN (E. Iarocci 1990/3) seen as very positive • Contrary to some claims, DRDC did reject a number of proposals to focus R&D before the formation of the LHCC • Does ELCSG encourage exploring this possibility ? • Perhaps should I try again with your help and with a concrete proposal ? F. Richard LAL/Orsay

  10. Summary • How to insure management and reviewing of EU Detector R&D ? • How to organize a better preparation for the next EU contract • And a related question: How to connect the various collider R&D to define a coherent EU demand ? • How to articulate DESY and CERN on these problems ? F. Richard LAL/Orsay

  11. F. Richard LAL/Orsay

More Related