Download
1 / 34
340 likes | 529 Views
Walter Reed Army Institute of research. COL David W. Craft PhD D(ABMM) Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Promotion Board Update. FY10 Major AMEDD Board. Secretariat for. S. S. ELECTION BOARD. OVERVIEW. Our Mission.
E N D
Walter Reed Army Institute of research COL David W. Craft PhD D(ABMM) Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
Promotion Board Update FY10 Major AMEDD Board
Secretariat for S S ELECTION BOARD
OVERVIEW Our Mission • Conduct all centralized active component officer selection boards • Provide administrative and technical support to DA Selection Boards • Coordinate membership for DA Selection Boards
Provides MAX & MIN selection capability • Provides Special Skill Requirements • Authority for Board • Board Mission • Defines Zones of Consideration • OER Cut-off Authority • Additional Guidance from SA as required • (OER, Training Base, Reserve Component Duty) • Joint Duty Goals • EO Information ENCLOSURES SEC ARMY COVER MEMO OVERVIEW The Sec Army’s MOI
Statute (Title X) Requires: Army Policy Requires: • Branch representation • Ethnic and female representation • LTC (O5) or above • 50% O5/O6 CSL Commander • 5 or more active duty members • Senior to officers being considered • Reserve officer representation • Joint representation • Cannot sit 2 consecutive boards OVERVIEW Board Member Selection
Promotion Board Operations Promotion Selection Board
BOARD OPS Board Room Procedures and Security • No personal knowledge allowed* • All board members & a recorder must be present for board discussions, deliberations and decisions • No informal office visits(to include career managers) • No visitors allowed in the board room • All board related material & discussion stays in the board room
Fully Qualified Best Qualified 100% Select Rate Capability Numerical Constraints Fully qualified officers who “meet specific branch, functional area or skill requirements”… to meet the Needs of the Army. (Command & most promotion boards) “… qualified professionally and morally to perform the duties expected of an officer in the next higher grade.” (SELCON) BOARD OPS (AR 600-8-29)
Word Picture 1 - 6+ MOI + + + CONVENING AUTHORITY’S MOI BOARD FILE SCORING CRITERIA BOARD MEMBER EXPERIENCE & JUDGMENT = VOTE BOARD OPS Board Member Voting
BOARD OPS • Phase I - In/Above Zone Voting (FQ) • Phase II - BZ Voting • Phase III - Comparison & Requirements • Phase IV - Show Cause • Phase V - Paperwork
PHASE I Identify Fully Qualified Officers • Vote Files (1 thru 6 +/-) • ID Possible Show Cause Cases • Establish OML • Establish Fully Qualified Line
Word Picture (IAZ) Top Few Superior Performer Superior Potential 6 +/- 5 +/- 4 +/- 3 +/- 2 +/- 1 FULLY QUALIFIED Select Ahead of Peers Outstanding Performer Outstanding Potential FULLY QUALIFIED Select with Peers Solid Performer Good Potential FULLY QUALIFIED Select if there is a Requirement Average Performer/Potential FULLY QUALIFIED NOT FULLY QUALIFIED Do not Select Weak Performer NOT FULLY QUALIFIED Show Cause
IAZ Population • Determine “FQ” line Hard Vote NOT FULLY QUALIFIED PHASE I Identify Fully Qualified Officers MAX Score FULLY QUALIFIED MIN Score
PHASE II Identify Potential BZ Selects AR 600-8-29 Officer Promotions 1-34b. Below the zone promotions are an essential part of the promotion system. They are intended to provide officers of exceptional ability an opportunity to advance quickly to more responsible positions, help retain high quality officers, and give officers an incentive to perform at their highest level.
PHASE II Identify Potential BZ Selects • DA MEMO 600-2 • The Army must identify its best officers and promote them earlier to afford them sufficient remaining service to be available as our senior leaders. • Officers selected from BZ replace those who otherwise would be promoted from in and above the promotion zone; therefore, they must be clearly superior to those who would otherwise be promoted.
PHASE II Identify Potential BZ Selects Screen Vote: YES/NO/SC Hard Vote: 2-6+/- BZ MOI Guidance:MIN = 0, MAX= 2
I/AZ Comparison Files NOT FULLY QUALIFIED Order of Merit List (OML) Requirements: Optimum = 10 Max BZs = 2 Phase III: Tentatively Best Qualified Line Phase I: Fully Qualified Line
1 2* 2 1 9 10 Phase III: Identify Best Qualified Officers BZ OML IAZ OML TBQ • The lowest scoring BZ officer is compared against the highest scoring I/AZ Officer • Head to Head comparison Fully Qualified Not Fully Qualified
I/AZ FILE IS DISPLACED; OFFICER NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PROMOTION NOT FULLY QUALIFIED Order of Merit List (OML) Requirements: Optimum = 10 Max = 11 Max BZs = 2 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 Phase III: Best Qualified Line Phase I: Fully Qualified Line
YOU MAY DISCUSS: • Procedures, General • Concept of ops. • Processes (Tools for Consistency) • Voting tools • Word picture • Scoring system • ASBS • File Make-Up • Contents of Information Briefings YOU MAY NEVER DISCUSS: • Comments concerning individuals or groups of individuals made during Deliberations. • Relative Standing of any individual or groups of individuals on the Order of Merit List. • Any Statistical Analysis not published with board results. MAY / MAY NOT SUMMARY Adjournment Sec A Acts on Results Release Results Published Recess (Today) Specifics of MOI(as published) Statistics(as published) What it took to be selected Name of specific board served on • Recorder will notify member • Method of selection(ie Best or Fully Qualified) • Board composition (representation, number of members, makeup)
