another look to the bgo matrix calibration c voena infn roma n.
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Another look to the BGO matrix calibration C.Voena INFN Roma

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 15

Another look to the BGO matrix calibration C.Voena INFN Roma - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 69 Views
  • Uploaded on

Another look to the BGO matrix calibration C.Voena INFN Roma. Signal windows in OSC waveform analysis. As in the paper, event by-event for PMT i (start of signal is determined from average time profile): Q i = Integral[0,115]ns S i = Integral[50,115]ns

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Another look to the BGO matrix calibration C.Voena INFN Roma' - walda


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
signal windows in osc waveform analysis
Signal windows in OSC waveform analysis
  • As in the paper, event by-event for PMTi
  • (start of signal is determined from average time profile):
  • Qi = Integral[0,115]ns
  • Si = Integral[50,115]ns
  • Ci = Integral[0,16]ns-0.27*Si

mV

S2

S1

In the paper S1/S2 is assumed to be 20% on the basis of 2007 results

S1/S2=27%

sample

q sum q 1 q 2 q 3 q 4 distributions 50 gev
Qsum(=Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4) distributions (50 GeV)

central beam position

Qsum

Long tail at low total energy

q sum and q 1 dependence on downstream bc
Qsum and Q1 dependence on DownStream BC

Y(tdc counts)

Y(tdc counts)

Qsum

Q1

- Strange distributions at Y>0 and for some runs also at Y<200 and Y>-200 (Y= vertical coordinate of downstream beam chamber)

- The tails of Qsum distribution are concentrated at Y>0

Cut at Y<0 and Y>-200 in what follows

calibration procedure using q i minimize resolution
Calibration procedure using Qi: minimize resolution

Intercalibration constants k1i of all runs at 10-20-30-50-100-150-200 GeV at the three different position (21 runs) by minimizing:

j=run number

Overall calibration constant k from run at 50 GeV

in position c

results for q sum in central beam position
Results for Qsum in central beam position

Linearity

/E(GeV)

Resolution

0.30/√E(GeV)+1.3%

-1/√E(GeV)

E(GeV)

results for q sum in beam position b
Results for Qsum in beam position b)

Linearity

Resolution

/E(GeV)

0.31/√E(GeV)+0.5%

-1/√E(GeV)

E(GeV)

- Very non uniform behavior with respect to central position

- beam position a) is in better agreement with central

beam position

- Minimizing linearity for all runs brings mean linearity in

0.8-1.2 range for all positions

results for cerenkov signal in central beam position
Results for Cerenkov signal in central beam position

Linearity

/E(GeV)

Resolution

0.42/√E(GeV)+2%

E(GeV)

-1/√E(GeV)

- Optimizing the inter-calibration constants separatly

for C and S improve resolution of few %.

results for scintillation signal in central beam position
Results for scintillation signal in central beam position

Linearity

/E(GeV)

Resolution

0.47/√E(GeV)+1%

-1/√E(GeV)

E(GeV)

- Optimizing the inter-calibration constants separatly

for C and S improve resolution of few %.

summary
Summary
  • - BGO matrix calibrated by minimizing the resolution
  • at all energies
  • - Low energy tails removed to apply this procedure
  • - Resolutions for beam in central position
  • - Linearity at <5% level except at 10GeV and 20-30 GeV
  • for Cerenkov signal
  • - Very different response when beam is sent in position c)
  • - Some improvement in resolution with respect to approach
  • that minimizes linearity but worse linearity for Cerenkov
  • signal

C:0.42/√E(GeV)+2%

Q:0.30/√E(GeV)+0.5%

S:0.47/√E(GeV)+2%