1 / 41

Advances in the Design and Application of Catalysts for VRLA Batteries

Philadelphia Scientific. Advances in the Design and Application of Catalysts for VRLA Batteries. Harold A. Vanasse – Philadelphia Scientific Robert Anderson – Anderson’s Electronics. Presentation Outline. A Review of Catalyst Basics Advances in the Catalyst Design

von
Download Presentation

Advances in the Design and Application of Catalysts for VRLA Batteries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Philadelphia Scientific Advances in the Design and Application of Catalysts for VRLA Batteries Harold A. Vanasse – Philadelphia Scientific Robert Anderson – Anderson’s Electronics

  2. Presentation Outline • A Review of Catalyst Basics • Advances in the Catalyst Design • Hydrogen Sulfide in VRLA Cells • Catalyst Poisoning • A Design to Survive Poisons • Advances in the Field Application • Catalysts in Canada – Lessons Learned • Review of 3 Year Old Canadian TestSite

  3. Catalyst Basics • By placing a catalyst into a VRLA cell: • A small amount of O2 is prevented from reaching the negative plate. • The negative stays polarized. • The positive polarization is reduced. • The float current of the cell is lowered.

  4. Catalyst Basics

  5. Advances in the Catalyst Design

  6. Catalysts in the Field • 5 years of commercial VRLA Catalyst success. • A large number of cells returned to good health. • After 2-3 years, we found a small number of dead catalysts. • Original unprotected design. • Indicated by a rise in float current to pre-catalyst level.

  7. Dead Catalysts • No physical signs of damage to explain death. • Unprotected catalysts have been killed in most manufacturers’ cells in our lab. • Catalyst deaths are not certain. • Length of life can be as short as 12 months. • Theoretically catalysts never stop working …. unless poisoned. • Investigation revealed hydrogen sulfide (H2S) poisoning.

  8. H2S Produced on Negative Plate • Test rig collects gas produced over negative plate. • Very pure lead and 1.300 specific gravity acid used. • Test run at a variety of voltages. • Gas analyzed with GC.

  9. Test Results • High concentration of H2S produced. • H2S concentration independent of voltage. • H2S produced at normal cell voltage!

  10. H2S Absorbed by Positive Plate

  11. Lead oxides make up positive plate active material. Lead oxides absorb H2S. Test Results

  12. H2S Absorbed in a VRLA Cell

  13. Test Results • H2S clearly being removed in the cell. • 10 ppm of H2S detected when gassing rate was 1,000 times normal rate of cell on float!

  14. GC Analysis of VRLA Cells • Cells from multiple manufacturers sampled weekly for H2S since November 2000. • All cells on float service at 2.27 VPC at either 25°C or 32° C. • Results: • H2S routinely found in all cells. • H2S levels were inconsistent and varied from 0 ppm to 1 ppm, but were always much less than 1 ppm.

  15. H2S in VRLA Cells • H2S can be produced on the negative plate in a reaction between the plate and the acid. • H2S is absorbed by the PbO2 of the positive plate in large quantities. • An equilibrium condition exists where H2S concentration does not exceed 1 ppm.

  16. How do we protect the Catalyst? • Two possible methods: • Add a filter to remove poisons before they reach the catalyst material. • Slow down the gas flow reaching the catalyst to slow down the poisoning.

  17. Basic Filter Science • Precious metal catalysts can be poisoned by two categories of poison: • Electron Donors: Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) • Electron Receivers: Arsine & Stibine • A different filter is needed for each category.

  18. Our Filter Selection • We chose a dual-acting filter to address both types of poison. • Proprietary material filters electron donor poisons such as H2S. • Activated Carbon filters electron receiver poisons.

  19. Slowing Down the Reaction • There is a fixed amount of material inside the catalyst unit. • Catalyst and filter materials both absorb poisons until “used up”. • Limiting the gas access to the catalyst slows down the rate of poisoning and the rate of catalyst reaction.

  20. Microcat® Catalyst Design • Chamber created by non-porous walls. • Gas enters through one opening. • Microporous disk further restricts flow. • Gas passes through filter before reaching catalyst. Gas / Vapor Path Porous Disk Filter Material Catalyst Material Housing

  21. How long will it last? • Theoretical Life Estimate • Empirical Life Estimate

  22. Theoretical Life Estimate • Microcat® catalyst theoretical life is 45 times longer than original design. • Filter improves life by factor of 9. • Rate reduction improves life by factor of 5.

  23. Empirical Life Estimate: • Stubby Microcat® catalysts developed for accelerated testing. • 1/100th the H2S absorption capacity of normal. • All other materials the same. • Placed in VRLA cells on float at 2.25 VPC & 90ºF (32ºC). • Two tests running. • Float current and gas emitted are monitored for signs of death.

  24. Stubby Microcat®Catalyst Test Results • Stubby Microcats lasted for: • Unit 1: 407 days. • Unit 2: 273 days. • Translation: • Unit 1: 407 x 100 = 40,700 days = 111 yrs • Unit 2: 273 x 100 = 27,300 days = 75 yrs.

  25. Catalyst Life Estimate • Life estimates range from 75 years to 111 years. • We only need 20 years to match design life of VRLA battery. • A Catalyst is only one component in battery system and VRLA cells must be designed to minimize H2S production. • Fortunately this is part of good battery design.

  26. Catalyst Design Summary • Catalysts reduce float current and maintain cell capacity. • VRLA Cells can produce small amounts of H2S, which poisons catalysts. • H2S can be successfully filtered. • A catalyst design has been developed to survive in batteries.

  27. Advances in the Field Application of Catalysts

  28. Catalysts in Canada – Lessons Learned • Anderson’s Electronics has been adding water and catalysts to VRLA cells in Canada for over 3 years. • Main focus with catalysts has been the recovery of lost capacity of installed VRLA cells. • Their technique has been refined and improved over time. • The following data was collected by Anderson’s from sites in Canada.

  29. Steps to Reverse Capacity Loss • Assess the state of health of the cells. • Trended Ohmic Measurements & Capacity Testing • If necessary, rehydrate the affected cells to gain immediate improvement. • Install a Catalyst Vent Cap into each cell to address root cause of problem. • Inspect cells over time.

  30. Factors to Consider when Qualifying a VRLA Cell • Age of cell: Cells from 1994 to 1998 were successfully rehydrated this year. • Cell Leaks: The cell must pass an inspection including a pressure test in order to qualify for rehydration. • Physical damage: Positive Plate growth should not be in an advanced stage – no severely bulging jars or covers.

  31. Do Ohmic Readings Change After Catalyst Addition & Rehydration? • “Ohmic” refers to Conductance, Impedance or Internal Resistance. • Data must be collected over time and trended to get best results. • Rehydration significantly improves ohmic readings for cells that are experiencing the “dry-out” side effect of negative plate self discharge.

  32. Ohmic Change after Catalyst/Rehydration Process(1995) 530 Ah Cells

  33. A More Exact Way to Rehydrate VRLA Cells? • Anderson’s Electronics believes that VRLA cells dry out at different rates and should not be rehydrated using the same amount of water in each cell. • The rehydration tuning procedure has been further refined since last year to produce even more uniform readings.

  34. Example of Uniform Rehydration(1994) 615 Ah Cells

  35. Observations after Rehydrating 3,500 Canadian VRLA cells. • Age of cells worked on: 1994 to 1998. • All cells showed signs of improvement. • Newer cells (1997–1998) did not exhibit the same amount of ohmic improvement. • We believe that these cells were not as dried out as older cells. • Older cells (1994-1996) recovered with enough capacity to remain in service and provide adequate run times for the site loads.

  36. Average Ohmic Improvement after Catalyst/Water Addition

  37. Update on 3 Year Old Test Site • 2 year old data from this Canadian site presented at last year’s conference. • All cells are VRLA from 1993 and same manufacturer. • Cells were scheduled to be replaced but catalysts and water were added to each cell as a test.

  38. W Site Conductance Change

  39. W Site Load Test Run Time Change(Minutes before 1.90 VPC at 3 Hour Rate)

  40. W Test Site Summary • The improvements are still being maintained after 3 years. • This string was about to be recycled, however 3 years later it remains in service. • Site load being protected for the required amount of time (8 hours). • During the recent blackout this site was without power for 5 hours and the load was successfully carried by this string.

  41. Conclusions • The new generation of Microcat®catalyst product is engineered to survive real world conditions for the life of the cell. • Retrofitting your cells and rehydrating can: • Restore significant capacity for 3 years or more. • Save money on replacement batteries. • Help you get the capacity you need. • How did your non-Catalyst “protected” VRLA cells perform in the blackout?

More Related