Ethics decision making a case of providing rrt in thailand
Download
1 / 30

Ethics & Decision Making a case of providing RRT in Thailand - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 97 Views
  • Uploaded on

Ethics & Decision Making a case of providing RRT in Thailand. Yot Teerawattananon International Health Policy Program Journal club, 17 March 2006. Background. Introduction of universal health insurance (NHS-like system) in 2001

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Ethics & Decision Making a case of providing RRT in Thailand' - vivian-payne


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Ethics decision making a case of providing rrt in thailand

Ethics & Decision Makinga case of providing RRT in Thailand

Yot Teerawattananon

International Health Policy Program

Journal club, 17 March 2006


Background
Background

  • Introduction of universal health insurance (NHS-like system) in 2001

  • Dialysis for chronic renal disease (CRD) was excluded from the health service package

  • Disease incidence is 10,000 patients/year. Only 5% of patients with CRD can afford for dialysis (~ £6,000 per year)


Ethics decision making a case of providing rrt in thailand

VS.

Estimated programme output

Saving 9,500 lives each year


Cost effectiveness analysis
Cost effectiveness analysis

  • Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT)

    • Cost per life year saved (Teerawattananon et al 2005)

      • Peritoneal dialysis 10,170 US$

      • Hemodialysis 10,490 US$

  • Anti Retroviral Therapy - ART

    • Cost per life year saved (Lertiendumrong et al 2005)

      • Antiretroviral Therapy 590 US$

  • GNI Thailand

    • US$ 2,540 per capita (2006 WDR)

  • RRT is not cost-effective, as cost per life year saved is

    • 4 times of GNI per capita,

    • 18 times as expensive as the current national ART program.



Question
Question?

Given resource constraints and substantial budget is needed to spend on dialysis programme, is the programme justifiable on ethical and moral grounds?



Ethics decision making a case of providing rrt in thailand

Lipid lowering drugs e.g. statins reduces the odds of a coronary heart disease event by 30% e.g. reduce risk of cardiac death by 0.000X %

Statins: underused by those who would benefit

More people would benefit from prevention of coronary heart disease!


Ethics decision making a case of providing rrt in thailand

Rule of rescue coronary heart disease event by 30% e.g. reduce risk of cardiac death by 0.000X %


The rule of rescue
The rule of rescue coronary heart disease event by 30% e.g. reduce risk of cardiac death by 0.000X %

  • There is an identified person whose life is at risk

  • There exists an intervention which has a good change of saving the person’s life

  • It is justified to save this person’s life rather than others who cannot be identified e.g. a case of lipid lowering drugs


Ethics decision making a case of providing rrt in thailand
For coronary heart disease event by 30% e.g. reduce risk of cardiac death by 0.000X %

  • Death is a very significant harm but a very small chance of death is by no mean a great harm

  • In our lives, all of us trades small increase in the chance of death against really quite small benefits!


Against
Against coronary heart disease event by 30% e.g. reduce risk of cardiac death by 0.000X %

  • A women trapped in a house-fired. Without rescue she will die. She can be saved if a large number of people doing a rescue. Do you think you will join/support?

  • If you face 1:1000 risk of death in doing so

  • if 3,000 people joining the rescue


Ethics decision making a case of providing rrt in thailand

Your turn! What do you support? And why? coronary heart disease event by 30% e.g. reduce risk of cardiac death by 0.000X %

Rule of rescue


Utilitarianism vs kant s moral theory
Utilitarianism vs. Kant’s moral theory coronary heart disease event by 30% e.g. reduce risk of cardiac death by 0.000X %


Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism coronary heart disease event by 30% e.g. reduce risk of cardiac death by 0.000X %

  • The conversion of all things is to happiness or pleasure or utility

  • Everything has a common denominator—ready-made formula for assessing of what one should do morally

  • It downplays respect, human dignity, individual rights etc.


Checking utilitarianism
Checking utilitarianism coronary heart disease event by 30% e.g. reduce risk of cardiac death by 0.000X %

  • A case of Somsri and her rich uncle


Kant s moral theory
Kant’s moral theory coronary heart disease event by 30% e.g. reduce risk of cardiac death by 0.000X %

  • The will to do the right thing only for the sake of doing the right thing regardless of its consequences

  • The moral principle should be ‘universalizable’ and ‘categorical imperative’


Checking kant s moral theory
Checking Kant’s moral theory coronary heart disease event by 30% e.g. reduce risk of cardiac death by 0.000X %

  • A case of Somchai and a hiding would-be victim for a pursuing criminal


Reference
Reference coronary heart disease event by 30% e.g. reduce risk of cardiac death by 0.000X %

1. Thomson A. Critical reasoning in ethics: a practical introduction. London: Routledge, 1999.

2. Hope T. Medical ethics: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

3. Cookson R, Dolan P. Principles of justice in health care rationing. J Med Ethics 2000;26(5):323-9.

4. Pinkerton SD, Johnson-Masotti AP, Derse A, Layde PM. Ethical issues in cost-effectiveness analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning 2002;25(1):71-83.

5. Pignone M, Phillips C, Mulrow C. Use of lipid lowering drugs for primary prevention of coronary heart disease: meta-analysis of randomised trials 10.1136/bmj.321.7267.983. BMJ 2000;321(7267):983-986.