1 / 18

Choosing Among Different Assessment Methods

Choosing Among Different Assessment Methods . Learning Objectives. Determine which assessment is best to utilize in the hiring process Learn what required objectives influence assessment design Learn the operational impact of assessments

viveca
Download Presentation

Choosing Among Different Assessment Methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Choosing Among Different Assessment Methods

  2. Learning Objectives • Determine which assessment is best to utilize in the hiring process • Learn what required objectives influence assessment design • Learn the operational impact of assessments • Learn the pros and cons of utilizing different staffing assessments in the hiring process

  3. Designing Effective Assessment Methods • No one method works equally well for all jobs Why? • Many assessments only work well for a limited range of jobs • Effectiveness of an assessment depends on on a companies operational issues and constraints

  4. The Operational Impact of Assessments • Hiring Volumes • Realized when companies use assessments to hire new people • Quality of Applicant Flow • Assessments do not impact candidate quality • Staffing Practices • Assessments only work if decision makers use them consistently • Employee Retention • Can help identify the right candidates with the right motivations

  5. Method 1: No Standardized Assessment: Start at The Bottom and Work Up • Look at existing staffing processes • Building on current staffing methods

  6. Method 2: Self-Report Pre-Screening Questionnaires: The Value Structure • Increases administrative efficiency • Readily understood by most hiring managers and candidates • Helps create process that systematically screens out the wrong people

  7. Method 3: Applicant Investigations: Avoiding Catastrophic Hiring Mistakes • Wrong employees can be a company's greatest liability • Downside: they add cost and time to the staffing process • Downside: may lead to loss of applicants • Little value for predicting job performance

  8. Method 4: Structured Interviews: Maximizing Time Spent With Candidates • Unstructured interviews work very poorly, if at all • Not following a well defined agenda and set questions • Structured interviews work reasonably well • Follow a well defined agenda and set questions • Behavioral-based structured interviews tend to work best! • Uses behavioral base questions • Use behavioral-anchored rating scale for evaluation

  9. Method 5: Broad Self-Report And Situational Judgment Measures: Asking Candidates for Greater Level of Self-Description • Assess job-relevant aspects of a candidates personality, motives and experience after interview • Off-the-shelf measures of broad personality • Pre-configured assessments for specific jobs classes • Can oversimplify the relationship between candidates and job performance (i.e. sales)

  10. Method 6: Broad Knowledge and Skills Test:Testing Basic Job Requirements • Measures general knowledge and skills across board classes of jobs • Good for understanding if a candidate will lack fundamental skills and knowledge (SKs) • Transparent relevance for candidates and hiring managers

  11. Method 7: Broad Ability Tests: Getting A General Sense of Candidates’ Ability To Learn and Solve Problems • Measures mental capabilities related to reasoning, critical thinking, and logical problem solving • Challenge: usually has some adverse impact against the protected class • Challenge: candidates perceive them to be difficult

  12. Method 8: Integrating Broad Self Report Measures, Knowledge and Skills Tests, and Ability Test: Predicting Maximal and Typical Performance • Predicts task required to perform complex problems • Predicts performance on task that depend on volition

  13. Method 9: Localized Scoring: Accurately Interpreting Candidate Responses Norming Process of comparing a candidate’s assessment scores against scores received by other people who have taken the same assessment • Base norms on groups of whose characteristics are relevant to the position being staffed • Norms do not provide predictive information about a candidates likely job performance

  14. Method 10: Context-Specific Self-Report Measures: Asking Candidates To Describe Themselves in Greater Detail What do questions hone in on: • I am very good at most of the things I do. -taps into general self-confidence and self-esteem • I am very good at expressing my ideas to others. - taps into confidence in his or her speaking skills • I am very good at making formal presentations to large groups of people. - taps into experience training and making presentations

  15. Method 10: Context-Specific Self-Report Measures: Asking Candidates To Describe Themselves in Greater Detail Advantages: • More job relevant and favored by candidates • Gives companies a competitive advantage since they can not be resold

  16. Method 10: Context-Specific Self-Report Measures: Asking Candidates To Describe Themselves in Greater Detail Disadvantages: • Requires significant resources to develop • Requires a thorough job analysis • Requires development of new assessment content

  17. Method 11: Context-Specific Knowledge,Skills, And Ability Tests: Seeing What Candidates Can Actually Do • Require candidates to interpret information and perform task that are similar to things employees actually do on the job (a.k.a work samples) • Tests are the single most predicative type of assessments • Favorably viewed by candidates

  18. Method 11: Context-Specific Knowledge,Skills, And Ability Tests: Seeing What Candidates Can Actually Do Disadvantage: • Expensive to design and time-consuming to administer • May become quickly outdated if the job changes • May show adverse impact against protected class were solving complex problems is required

More Related