1 / 33

Islamic University of Gaza Electrical Engineering Department Communication I laboratory

Islamic University of Gaza Electrical Engineering Department Communication I laboratory . Amplitude modulation DSB-LC (full AM) . Submitted by: Adham Abu-Shamla Mohammed Hajjaj 120063320 120063640 Submitted to:

vitalis
Download Presentation

Islamic University of Gaza Electrical Engineering Department Communication I laboratory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Islamic University of Gaza Electrical Engineering Department Communication I laboratory Amplitude modulation DSB-LC (full AM) Submitted by: Adham Abu-Shamla Mohammed Hajjaj 120063320 120063640 Submitted to: Eng. Mohammed kamel Abu-Foul

  2. Contents: • The objective of this experiment. • Quick review about the AM modulation and (DSB-LC) • Part 1 code and its comments and results (step by step) • Part 2 code and its comment and results • Conclusion.

  3. Objective: • Understanding AM modulation, Double Side Band-Large Carrier (DSB-LC) “known as Full AM”. • Using MATLAB to plot the modulated signal. • To simulate coherent demodulator and an envelope detector to obtain the real signal using MATLAB.

  4. Quick review about the AM modulation and (DSB-LC)

  5. Type of AM Modulation • DSB-SC • DSB-LC • SSB • VSB

  6. (AM) and (FM) :

  7. Part 1 • Use MATLAB to simulate this block (AM block) (f(t)=cos(2π2000t),Ac=4,m=0.25,fc=20Khz) f(t) m Ac.cos(2.π.fct) S(t)=Ac[1+mf(t)] .cos(2.π.fct) X +

  8. Part 1 (a) code: the input signal Carrier freqyancy Sampling period Modulation index µ=mp/A DC shift Sampling frequancy • fc=20000; % Carrier frequency • ts=1/(10*fc); • t=[0:2000]*ts; • fs=1/ts; % Sampling frequency • m=.25; % Modulation index • Ac=4; % DC shift • x=cos(2*pi*2000*t); % the original signal • figure(1) • subplot(211) • plot(t,x) • title('plot of baseband signal x(t)') • xlabel('time (t)') • ylabel('x(t)') plot the real signal Comment: In the above code we chose ts =1/(10*fs) to avoid overlapping in signal, then we make Fourier transform to plot the magnitude spectrum.

  9. Code cont. • Xf=fftshift(fft(x)); • Xf=Xf/length(Xf); • deltax=fs/length(Xf); • fx=-fs/2:deltax:fs/2-deltax; • subplot(212) • plot(fx,abs(Xf)) • title('the fourier transform of x(t)') • xlabel('frequency (f)') • ylabel('X(f)') Fourier Transform of a real signal Plot the magnitude spectrum

  10. The results (part 1a) Two Sym. pulses on the signal frequency

  11. Code (part 1b): modulated signal • y=(1+m*x)*Ac.*cos(2*pi*fc*t); % (Modulated signal) • figure(2) • subplot(211) • plot(t,y) • title('the modulated signal y(t)=(1+m*x)*Ac.*cos(2*pi*fc*t)') • xlabel('time (t)') • ylabel('y(t)') • yf=fftshift(fft(y));

  12. Code (part 1b): modulated signal cont. • yf=yf/length(yf); • delta=fs/length(yf); • f=-fs/2:delta:fs/2-delta; • subplot(212) • plot(f,abs(yf)) • title('the fourier transform of the modulated signal Y(f)') • xlabel('frequency (f)') • ylabel('Y(f)') Plot the magnitude spectrum

  13. The results (part 1b) The same signal shifted at fc and the magnitude divided by 2

  14. Coherent detector S(t) w(t)) v(t) LPH cos(2.π.fc.t)

  15. Code (Part 1c-1) coherent demodulator “before filtering”. • w=y.*cos(2*pi*fc*t); % Coherent demodulated signal • figure(3) • subplot(211) • plot(t,w) • title('plot of demodulated signal w(t) before LPF') • xlabel('time (t)') • ylabel('w(t)') • wf=fftshift(fft(w));

  16. Code (Part 1c-1) coherent demodulator “before filtering”. • wf=wf/length(wf); • delta=fs/length(wf); • f=-fs/2:delta:fs/2-delta; • subplot(212) • plot(f,abs(wf)) • title('fourier transform of the demodulated signal W(f)') • xlabel('frequency (f)') • ylabel('W(f)')

  17. The results (part 1c-1) The modulated signal shifted at 2*fc and the magnitude divided by 2 There are a signal in 0 as real signal

  18. Code (Part 1c-2) coherent demodulator “after filtering”. the lower frequency of the transient region ( must be between 0 and 1 ) The Upper frequency of the transient region ( must be between 0 and 1 ) losses due to rippels Fn. that return the order of the filter and the cutt off frequency Fn. that return the transfer function of the Butterworth filter • Wp=5000/fs; • Ws=20000/fs; • Rp=-1; • Rs=-100; • [N, Wn] = BUTTORD(Wp, Ws, Rp, Rs); % • [num,den]=butter(N,Wn); %

  19. Code (Part 1c-2) coherent demodulator “after filtering”. Filtering process • v=filter(num,den,w); • figure(4) • subplot(211) • plot(t,v) • title('the demodulated signal after LPF v(t)') • xlabel('time (t)') • ylabel('v(t)')

  20. Code (Part 1c-2) coherent demodulator “after filtering”. Vf=fftshift(fft(v)); • Vf=Vf/length(Vf); • deltav=fs/length(Vf); • fv=-fs/2:deltav:fs/2-deltav; • subplot(212) • plot(fv,abs(Vf)) • title('the fourier transform of v(t)') • xlabel('frequency (f)') • ylabel('V(f)')

  21. The results (part 1c-2) There are a signal in 0 as real signal only

  22. Envelope detector

  23. Code (part 1d) %C=0.1e-6F,R=3.2e2%%%%% • c=0.1e-6; • r=3.2e2; • RC=r*c; • Vc=ones*(1:length(y)); • Vc(1)=y(1); • for i=2:length(y) • if y(i)>=Vc(i-1)

  24. Code (part 1d) • Vc(i)=y(i); • else • Vc(i)=Vc(i-1).*exp(-ts/RC); • end • end • figure(5) • plot(t,y,t,Vc) • %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% We can explain this code by the following flow chart

  25. start Vc(1)=y(1) i=2 Y(i)>=Vc(i-1) NO YES Vc(i)=y(i) Vc(i)=Vc(i-1).*exp(-ts/RC); i=length(Y) NO YES start

  26. The results (C=0.1e-6F,R=3.2e2)

  27. If we change R R=3.2e(3) R=3.2e(4)

  28. Part 2 • Repeat part 1 with Ac=1, m = 2 After we make the simulation, the result is the same in part 1, but we saw some difference in the envelope detector . we will show the results of this part and comment the reason

  29. Result of envelope overlap

  30. Result of envelope Not as real signal

  31. Comment in part 2 • The reason of part 2 become like this becouse the Ac is not enough to alternate the signal up to zero so envelope detector can’t get the real signal

  32. Conclusion • The experiment is a good simulate for AM signals. • We must make sure of the code because any error causes fail in compiling

  33. Thank you

More Related