An International Fund for
1 / 13

An International Fund for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships INTERTANKO - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

An International Fund for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships INTERTANKO ISTEC & Executive Committees Dubai, 20 -21 January 2009 Christian BREINHOLT Director Danish Maritime Authority. What is the situation?. IMO - The Specialised Agency - No More Favourable Treatment UNFCCC

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'An International Fund for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships INTERTANKO' - vilina

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
An international fund for greenhouse gas emissions from ships intertanko

An International Fund for

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships


ISTEC & Executive Committees

Dubai, 20 -21 January 2009



Danish Maritime Authority

What is the situation
What is the situation?

  • IMO

    - The Specialised Agency

    - No More Favourable Treatment


    - A new global agreement in 2009 (COP 15)

    - Common but Differentiated Responsibilities

Imo action on ghg emissions from ships
IMO action on GHG emissions from ships

  • Nine fundamental principles

  • Technical measures

  • Operational measures

  • Market based measures

Nine fundamental principles
Nine fundamental principles

  • Effective in contributing to the reduction of total global GHG emissions

  • Binding & equally applicable to all flag States

  • Cost-effective

  • Able to limit or effectively minimize competitive distortion

  • Based on sustainable environmental development without penalizing global trade and growth

  • Based on a goal-based approach and not prescribe specific methods

  • Supportive of promoting and facilitating technical innovation and R&D in the entire shipping sector

  • Accommodating to leading technologies in the field of energy efficiency

  • Practical, transparent, fraud free and easy to administer

Principal debate in imo
Principal debate in IMO

  • IMO or UNFCCC principles?

  • Before or after COP 15?

  • Mandatory or voluntary?

  • Technical and/or market based?

Future work in imo
Future work in IMO

  • IMO GHG WG II: 9-13 March 2009

  • MEPC 59: 13-17 July 2009

  • Assembly: 23 November - 4 December

  • COP 15: 1- 18 December 2009

An international ghg fund rationale for the proposal
An International GHG Fund - rationale for the proposal

  • Long life of ships

  • Growth in international shipping

  • Contributions from all sectors

  • Offsetting GHG emissions

An international ghg fund key elements
An International GHG Fund – Key Elements

  • Bunker fuel contribution:

    - Mandatory registration of Bunker Fuel Suppliers

    - Based on the Bunker Delivery Note as evidence

    - Collection by registered Bunker Fuel Suppliers

    - Direct transfer to the International GHG Fund

    - Ships in international trade – all marine fuels

  • Revenues:

    - Mitigation, Adaption and Technology Projects

    - Non-vessel Specific R&D Projects

    - Technological Cooperation within IMO

  • A global, binding, separate legal entity – a new Convention

An international ghg fund obligations
An International GHG Fund - Obligations

The Ship Owners/Operators:

  • Purchase fuel from registered Bunker Fuel Suppliers

  • Keep the Bunker Delivery Note on board

    The Bunker Fuel Suppliers:

  • Mandatory/voluntary registration

  • Provide a certified Bunker Delivery Note

  • Collect and transfer directly to the International GHG Fund

  • Electronic report and recordkeeping of bunker fuel sold

    The States Parties:

  • Port State Control

  • Inspections of Bunker Fuel Suppliers

An international ghg fund organisation and administration
An International GHG Fund - Organisation and Administration

Legal Structure based on the IOPC Funds:

  • Assembly

  • Secretariat

    Tasks and responsibilities:

  • Receive, record and monitor information

  • Maintain and allocate revenues

  • Keep a ship specific registry

  • Keep a global registry of Bunker Fuel Suppliers

  • Submit an annual report

Co 2 offsetting impacts through a contribution
CO2 offsetting impacts through a contribution

Key figures

Total emissions from international shipping: approx. 1,100 Mt. CO2 (BLG 12/6/1)

Consumed bunker fuel: approx. 365 million tons

Actual price for a JI/CDM-credit: approx. EUR 10-15 (approx. $15 -22.5)

Expected future price for JI/CDM credit: approx. EUR 20-30 (approx $30-45)

Different scenarios

GHG contribution at a given US dollar per ton bunker fuel:

An international ghg fund virtues
An International GHG Fund - Virtues

  • Meet all nine fundamental principles:

    - Contribute to reductions in global GHG emissions

    - Equally applicable to ships – regardless of flag

    - Allow growth in international shipping

    - Support technical innovation and R&D

    - Easy to administer

  • Assist solving the challenges of climate change

  • Revenues for the benefit of developing countries

  • Embrace Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (States) and respect No More Favourable Treatment (ships)

  • Emission baseline established for free

  • Eliminates any need for allocating GHG emissions

  • Rely on well-established conceptual approaches

An international ghg fund
An International GHG Fund

Main points of concern addressed by INTERTANKO:

  • Kyoto compatibility?

  • GHG reductions through offsetting?

  • Varying contributions according to bunker fuel?

  • Enforcement mechanisms for Bunker fuel suppliers?

  • Non-compliance by ships and/or Bunker Fuel Suppliers?

  • Practicality of the existing Bunker Delivery Note System?