1 / 28

Pain Management for Amputees

Pain Management for Amputees. Dr Craig Davenport Rehabilitation Registrar Liverpool Hospital 19 th August 2005. Pain in the Amputee. Pre-operative pain – ischaemic, infection, trauma Early Post-op pain – somatic vs neuropathic, stump vs phantom limb

vienna
Download Presentation

Pain Management for Amputees

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Pain Management for Amputees Dr Craig Davenport Rehabilitation Registrar Liverpool Hospital 19th August 2005

  2. Pain in the Amputee • Pre-operative pain – ischaemic, infection, trauma • Early Post-op pain – somatic vs neuropathic, stump vs phantom limb • Late post-op pain – stump vs phantom limb

  3. Stump Pain • Somatic stump pain usually resolves as the wound heals • Can trigger Phantom pain • Prolonged stump pain usually attributable to local pathology – delayed wound healing, infection, surgical complications, poor prosthetic fit, neuromas, adherent scars • Late onset stump pain - neuromas, prosthetic fit, claudication, bony overgrowth, osteoarthritis , tumour recurrence

  4. Phantom Pain vs Sensation Phantom limb Sensation – almost universal • doesn’t correlate with pain reports Non-painful phantom sensations of 3 types: • Kinetic senstations (movement) • Kinesthetic (size,shape,position) • Exteroceptive (touch, pressure, temperature, itch, vibration)

  5. Phantom Limb Pain • Phantom pains often described as crushing, toes twisting, hot iron, burning, tingling, cramping, shocking, shooting, “pins & needles” • Tends to localise to more distal phantom structures (eg fingers and toes) • prevalence in early stages 60-80% • Independent of age in adults, gender, level or side of amputation

  6. PLP Onset • Mostly onset immediately after amputation, some at two weeks. Rarely months later • 1/3 maximal immediately post-op and generally resolved by 100 days • ½ slowly peaked then improved within 100 days • ¼ slower rise toward maximal pain (Weinstein, 1996)

  7. PLP Natural History • Tends to diminish in severity and frequency over time, with resolution over several weeks to 2 years • One study – 72% at 8 days, 65% at 6 months, 59% at 2 years (Jensen, 1985) • Duration of episodes vary - continuous 12%, days 2%, hours 37%, seconds 38% (Sherman & Sherman,1983) • 50% had decreasing PLP with time • 50% no change or increase over time (Sherman et al, 1984)

  8. PLP Natural History • Stump pain intensity tends not to correlate with PLP intensity • 2/3 experience telescoping of phantom limb

  9. Also in Kids • PLP also occurs in children, often under-recognised • 70-75% at 7 years after amputation, but none severe (Boyle et al, 1982) • Less in congenital limb deficiency

  10. Why does pain occur? Peripheral neuropathic mechanisms: • immediate nerve injury discharge • local nociceptive substances • deafferentation • ectopic firing • neuromas • Ephatic transmission b/w sensory and sympathetic fibers

  11. Why does pain occur? Spinal cord: • Expansion of receptive fields • Low-threshold inputs when high-threshold inputs lost • Disinhibition Brain: • Cortical engram generates pain in absence of stimuli • Cortical reorganisation

  12. Why does pain occur? Non-neurological factors: • Skin blood flow • Stump temperature • Muscle tension Psychological factors: • Stressors/ depression/ anxiety • Not personality types

  13. Treatment Approach • Non-Medical and Medical/Surgical • Prevent contractures • Limit oedema • Adequate Post-op Analgesia • Desensitisation - massage/bandaging • Get patient moving, distraction helps • Early prosthetic training

  14. Treatment Approach • Somatic Pain – non-pharm, simple analgesics, NSAIDs, tramadol, opioids • Neuropathic/Phantom Limb Pain – follow neuropathic pain principles – Non-pharm, TCA’s, anticonvulsants, local anaesthetics

  15. Non-Medical Treatments • TENS • Vibration Therapy • Acupuncture • Hypnosis • Biofeedback • Electroconvulsive Therapy • Mirror Treatment • Cognitive Behavioural Therapy • Farabloc (Conine 1993)

  16. Peripheral Stimulation • Controlled trial of TENS/sham/largactil showed benefit at 16 weeks; no difference beyond 12 months, improved stump healing (Finsen,1988) • Auricular TENS – controlled trial showed beneficial (Katz, 1991) • Vibration & Acupuncture only case reports

  17. Potential Drug Treatments • Epidural anaesthesia • Amitriptyline (Tricyclic antidepressants) • Anticonvulsants – carbamazepine, gabapentin • Clonazepam • Opioids/Tramadol • Mexiletine/lignocaine • Beta/alpha blockers - clonidine • Intrathecal opioids/ lignocaine • Capsaicin cream, NSAID cream • IV Ketamine • Sympathetic ganglion block

  18. Pre-emptive Analgesia • Pre-operative anaesthesia: • Early trials looked promising but less robust • Better designed trials did not show benefit in PLP (Nikolajsen 1997) • Peri-op regional nerve blocks – decreased use of opioids in early post-op period (Pinzer, 1996)(Fisher, 1991)

  19. Amitriptyline (Endep) • Well documented for neuropathic pain (Kingery, 1997) • Generally considered effective • Dose 10mg up to 150mg (75mg in elderly) • Recent RCT in PLP  no benefit (Robinson 2004)

  20. Other TCA’s • Nortryptiline • Imipramine • Doxepin

  21. Gabapentin (Neurontin) • Evidence in neuropathic pain • RCT in PLP benefit at 6 weeks (Bone 2002) • 100mg tds up to 1200mg tds • Relatively well tolerated • Main side effects are dizziness/somnolence/memory impairment • Not subsidised by PBS for pain  $150/mth

  22. Other Anticonvulsants • Carbamazepine (Tegretol) – cheap; proven in neuropathic pain, nasty haematological S/E’s • Lamotrigine (Lamictal)– emerging evidence for neuropathic pain • Valproate (Epilim)– lacks evidence, not very effective

  23. Others • Capsaicin – no RCT for PLP; unpleasant • IV calcitonin (post-op) – unknown mechanism; reduced early PLP, longer term effect lacks evidence (Jaeger, 1992) • Mexiletine – open label study in PLP; risk of sudden death • Beta-blockers – limited reports • Benzodiazepines – clonazepam limited reports • IV Ketamine – reduces ‘wind-up’ – short-term reduction in PLP (Nikolajsen 1996) • Opioids – probably have a role • Tramadol – alternative to opioids • NSAIDs not effective

  24. Pain and Prostheses • Use of Prosthesis – may increase or decrease pain • Poor prosthetic fit may irritate stump tissues or neuroma  revise socket • Musculoskeletal pain due to altered biomechanics  PTK/thigh lacer • Sensitive stump may require altered prosthetic prescription  Silicon liner, Thigh Lacer • Stump bandaging/ hard casting may reduce pain

  25. Neuromas • localized pain, sharp/shooting/paraesthesia • Reproduced by local palpation, relieved by LA injection • Tinel’s sign • Try socket relief and local steroid/LA injection • Ablation – Phenol alcohol injection into neuroma • Surgery – not much evidence, high recurrence rate

  26. Nasty Interventions • Stump surgery – for defined pathology  bury nerve terminal in bone, excise bony spurs • DREZ lesioning • Sympathectomy – conclusive evidence lacking (Mailis 2003) • Spinal cord stimulation – works but expensive, infection risk • Deep Brain or Motor Cortex Stimulation – works but effect decreases with time • Cordotomy/thalamotomy

  27. Prognosis • When PLP persists 6 months, prognosis for spontaneous improvement is poor • Probably <10% have persistent severe pain

  28. References • Bone et al, Reg Anaesth & Pain Med, 2002;27(5):481-6 • Boyle et al, Oncology, 1982;10:301-312 • Conine et al, Can J Rehab, 1993;6:155-61 • Finsen et al, J of Bone & Joint Surg Br,1988;70:109-12 • Fisher et al, Anaesth Analg, 1991;72:300-3 • Halbert et al, Clin Journal of Pain, 2002; 18:84-92 • Jaeger et al, Pain , 1992;48:21-7 • Jensen et al, Pain, 1985;21:267-78 • Katz et al, J of Pain & Symp Man, 1991; 6:73-83 • Kingery, Pain, 1997;73(2):123-39 • Levy et al, APMR, 2001; 82(Suppl 1):S25-30 • Malis et al, Cochrane database of Systemmatic Reviews, 2003(2):CD002918 • Nikolajsen et al, Pain, 1996;67:69-77 • Nikolajsen et al, Lancet,1997;350:1353-7 • Pinzur et al, J Bone % Joint Surg Am, 1996;79:1752-3 • Robinson et al, APMR,2004;85:1-6 • Sherman et al, Pain,1984;18:83-95 • Sherman & Sherman, Am J of Phys Med, 1983;62:227-38 • Weinstein, 8th World Congress on Pain, 1996 pg376

More Related