1 / 15

MassCUE Evaluators – Maximizing Your Technology Investment

MassCUE Evaluators – Maximizing Your Technology Investment. Documenting the Impact of Instructional Technology Initiatives. Who We Are. Sun Associates Jeff Sun Jeanne Clark www.sun-associates.com/masscue MassCUE and Boston College. Why Evaluate?.

victorfrazier
Download Presentation

MassCUE Evaluators – Maximizing Your Technology Investment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MassCUE Evaluators – Maximizing Your Technology Investment Documenting the Impact of Instructional Technology Initiatives

  2. Who We Are • Sun Associates • Jeff Sun • Jeanne Clark • www.sun-associates.com/masscue • MassCUE and Boston College

  3. Why Evaluate? • Determine if your investment in instructional technology is “paying off” • Measure progress toward meeting your project goals • Support action planning with data

  4. An Evaluation Plan… • Is organized around the goals of your project • Defines success through the creation of indicators keyed to your project goals • Produces data specifically targeted at measuring success relative to your project goals • Provides feedback and recommendations for improvement

  5. An Example Project • iPad implementation in an elementary school (grades 3 – 5) • Goals… • Increase the ability to support project-based, small group learning • Decrease cost of materials such as texts, reference materials, etc.

  6. Schematic View of the Evaluation Process

  7. Indicators • Pedagogy • Students involved in the iPad project are engaged in student-centered, project-based, activities that make use of 1:1 access to info, resources and collaborative online environments.  Teachers have been provided with the training necessary to support the pedagogy involved in the project. • Materials/Infrastructure

  8. Materials/Infrastructure • Implementation of iPads (1:1) in grades 3 – 5 results in an initial first year savings of 10% compared to the cost of texts, paper resource materials, photocopying, and teacher time involved in moving students to and from the computer lab. 10% additional savings are anticipated for each of the next 3 years.

  9. Data Collection Students involved in the iPad project are engaged in student-centered, project-based, activities that make use of 1:1 access to information, resources and collaborative online environments.  Teachers have been provided with the training necessary to support the pedagogy involved in the project. • Student-centered, project-based, learning • Classroom observations • Teacher focus groups/interviews • Review of lessons plans • Rubrics • 1:1 access • Classroom observations • Information resources, collaborative environments, tools • Classroom observations • Review of lessons and student work product (against rubrics) • Teacher professional development • Teacher learning plans • Professional development observation • Teacher focus groups/interviews • Professional development participant surveys

  10. Analysis and Findings • Data analysis – comparing data to indicators -- will show the degree to which actions (PD, pedagogy, student work, infrastructure implementation) come together to produce the intended result. • Findings are the results of this analysis.

  11. For Example… • If you discover that teachers are not actually using the iPads for project-based learning – what are reasons for this? • One reason might be related to the PD • Did the PD support the development of new pedagogies? • How could the PD – content, structure, follow-up, participation – be modified to better support the initiative?

  12. Recommendations • Findings (analysis) lead to recommendations and reporting. • Recommendations lead to action items. • What are you going to do to implement the recommendations?

  13. What Does This Mean to You? • The MassCUE Evaluators’ project will • Work with a team from your district to develop an evaluation plan with indicators and data collection tools • Offer training and support in data collection and reporting • Position your district to logically reflect upon its progress toward meeting programmatic goals and substantiating your investment in instructional technology

  14. Participation • Each district should register a 4 to 6 person team • Superintendent or Assistant Superintendent • Technology specialist or coordinator • Curriculum and Instruction specialist • Professional development specialist • Classroom teacher or instructional specialist who works with students • MassCUE members fee = $2400 for a 4-person team ($3400 for a 6-person team) • 4 full-day sessions starting in January, 2012 (2 in January, 1 in February, and 1 in March) • Fee covers lunch and follow-up support by Sun Associates and Boston College

  15. Ingrid Eppelsheimer at ieppelsheimer@fc.masscue.org

More Related