slide1 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 35

why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 113 Views
  • Uploaded on

P. A. L. Community College Baltimore County. Outline of Today’s Presentation. why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans. the accelerated learning program. A. L. P. The Accelerated Learning Project. RDG 052. RDG 051. ENGL 051. ENGL 052. ENG 101. ENG

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'why we developed ALP what ALP is results costs future plans' - vernados


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

P

A

L

Community College Baltimore County

Outline of Today’s Presentation

  • why we developed ALP
  • what ALP is
  • results
  • costs
  • future plans

the accelerated learning program

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

ccbc s developmental education program courses

RDG

052

RDG

051

ENGL

051

ENGL

052

ENG

101

ENG

102

MATH

082

MATH

083

MATH

081

CCBC’s Developmental Education Program:Courses

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide3

took no

more writing

courses

111

11%

have not

passed 052

318

31%

A, B, or C

in 101

358

35%

S in 052

705

69%

took 101

594

58%

took 052

fa 06

1023

D, F. I, or W

in 101

236

23%

The Problem ALP Addresses

results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010

42%

slide4

Outline of Today’s Presentation

  • why we developed ALP
  • what ALP is
  • results
  • costs
  • future plans

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide5

ENG 052

ENG 101

semester 2

Traditional ENG 052

semester 1

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide6

ENG 101

ENG 052

semester 1

semester 1

ALP

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide7

Outline of Today’s Presentation

  • why we developed ALP
  • what ALP is
  • results
  • costs
  • future plans

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide8

took no

more writing

courses

111

11%

have not

passed 052

318

31%

U, W, or I

in 052

102

19%

A, B, or C

in 101

358

35%

S in 052

422

81%

S in 052

705

69%

took 052

2007-09

524

took 101

594

58%

took 052

fa 06

1023

D, F. I, or W

in 101

236

23%

results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010

students who took ALP from

fall 07 to

spring 10

as of June 2010

slide9

took no

more writing

courses

111

11%

took no

more writing

courses

0

0%

have not

passed 052

318

31%

U, W, or I

in 052

102

19%

A, B, or C

in 101

358

35%

S in 052

422

81%

S in 052

705

69%

took 052

2007-09

524

took 101

524

100%

took 101

594

58%

took 052

fa 06

1023

D, F. I, or W

in 101

236

23%

students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06

students who took ALP from

fall 07 to

spring 10

as of June 2010

slide10

took no

more writing

courses

111

11%

took no

more writing

courses

0

0%

have not

passed 052

318

31%

U, W, or I

in 052

102

19%

A, B, or C

in 101

358

35%

A, B, or C

in 101

365

70%

S in 052

422

81%

S in 052

705

69%

took 052

2007-09

524

took 101

524

100%

took 101

594

58%

took 052

fa 06

1023

D, F. I, or W

in 101

159

30%

D, F. I, or W

in 101

236

23%

results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010

students who took ALP from

fall 07 to

spring 10

as of June 2010

slide11

took no

more writing

courses

111

11%

took no

more writing

courses

0

0%

have not

passed 052

318

31%

have not

passed 052

102

19%

passed 052

705

69%

passed 052

422

81%

took 052

2007-09

524

took 101

524

100%

took 101

594

58%

passed 101

358

35%

passed 101

365

70%

took 052

fa 06

1023

have not

passed 101

159

30%

did not

pass 101

236

23%

results for students who took traditional developmental writing in fall 06 as of June 2010

42%

students who took ALP from

fall 07 to

spring 10

as of June 2010

19%

slide12

35%

pass

ENGL

101

70%

pass

ENGL

101

74%

pass

ENGL

101

69%

pass

ENGL

101

71%

pass

ENGL

101

58%

pass

ENGL

101

68%

pass

ENGL

101

ALP Success Rates, 2007-09

75%

50%

25%

ALP

fall 07

traditional

052

fall 06

ALP

spring 08

ALP

fall 09

ALP

spring 10

ALP

fall 08

ALP

spring 09

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide13

took no

more writing

courses

111

11%

took 102

187

36%

passed

ENG 102

107

10%

took

ENG 102

154

15%

passed

ENG 102

127

24%

took no

more writing

courses

0

0%

have not

passed 052

102

19%

have not

passed 052

318

31%

passed 052

705

69%

passed 052

422

81%

took 052

2007-09

524

took 101

524

100%

took 101

594

58%

passed 101

358

35%

passed 101

365

70%

took 052

fa 06

1023

have not

passed 102

60

11%

haven’t

taken

ENG 102

178

34%

F, I, or W

in ENG102

47

5%

haven’t

taken

ENG 102

125

12%

have not

passed 101

159

30%

did not

pass 101

236

23%

slide14

10%

15%

5%

7%

Longitudinal Studies: degree completion

15%

traditional

ENGL 052

fall 06

ALP

2007-8

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide15
Nikki Edgecombe and Davis Jenkins

Community College Research Center

Teachers College, Columbia University

Funded by the Lumina Foundation

Community College of Baltimore CountyAccelerated Learning Program (ALP) Preliminary Analysis of Effectiveness
slide16

Outline of Today’s Presentation

  • why we developed ALP
  • what ALP is
  • results
  • costs
  • future plans

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide17

Costs Under Traditional Model

500 students

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide18

Costs Under Traditional Model

20 students per section

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide19

Costs for Dev Course Under Traditional Model

25 sections of Dev Eng

X 3 faculty credit hours/section

= 75 faculty credit hours

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide20

Costs for ENG 101 Under Traditional Model

37% of traditional developmental

students take FYC

.37 X 500 = 185 students

185 students ÷ 20 students/section

= 9.25 sections

9.25 sections X 3 faculty credit hours/section

= 27.75 faculty credit hours

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide21

Costs for FYC* Under Traditional Model

total for developmental course =

75 faculty credit hours

27.5 faculty credit hours

total for FYC =

total =

102.5 faculty credit hours

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide22

Costs Under ALP

500 students

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide23

Costs Under ALP

8 students per section

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide24

Costs Under ALP Model

62.5 sections of ALP Dev Eng

X 2 faculty credit hours/section

= 125 faculty credit hours

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide25

Costs for FYC Under ALP Model

100% of ALP developmental

students take FYC

1.00 X 500 = 500 students

500 students ÷ 20 students/section

= 25 sections

25 sections X 3 faculty credit hours/section

= 75 faculty credit hours

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide26

Comparison of Costs for 500 Students

Traditional

ALP

DEV: 25 sect X 3 cr/sect = 75.00 fch*

DEV: 62.5 sect X 2 cr/sect = 125 fch

FYC: 9.25 sect X 3 cr/sect = 27.75 fch

FYC: 25 sect X 3 cr/sect = 75 fch

TOTAL: 102.75 fch

TOTAL: 200 fch

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide27

ALP factory

traditional factory

ALP factory

An Analogy

cost/year

to operate

widgets

per year

cost per

widget

$100,000

10,000

$10

$200,000

22,000

$9.09

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide28

cost per year

students per year

cost per student

traditional factory

ALP factory

students per

year

cost per year

cost per student

An Analogy

175 (35%) of

500 students

pass FYC

.59 fch per passing student

102.75 fch

350 (70%)

of 500 students

pass FYC

.57 fch per passing student

200 fch

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide29

ALP Summary

Based on four semesters of data and 227 students, compared to traditional developmental writing:

  • ALP doubles the success rate.
  • cuts the attrition rate in half
  • does it in half the time
  • at slightly less cost per successful student

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide30

Outline of Today’s Presentation

  • why we developed ALP
  • what ALP is
  • results
  • costs
  • future plans

A

L

P

The Accelerated Learning Project

slide31

160students

20 sections

80 sections

320

students

40 sections

80

students

1280

students

160 sections

640

students

2011-12

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

slide32

Dissemination

Institutions that are currently offering sections of ALP:

El Paso Community College (Texas)

Gateway Community College (Kentucky)

Lone Star College Tomball (TX)

Patrick Henry Community College (Virginia)

Valley Forge Military College (PA)

North Central State College (OH)

slide33

Dissemination

Institutions that plan to offer some sections of ALP within one year:

Blue Ridge Community and Technical College (WV)

The Graduate School (DC)

Middlesex Community College (MA)

Missouri State University-West Plains (MO)

Springfield Technical Community College (MA)

West Kentucky Community and Technical College (KY)

West Virginia Northern Community College (WV)

slide34

Dissemination

Institutions that are planning to offer some sections of ALP in the future:

Community College of District of Columbia (DC)

Delaware Community and Technical College (DE)

Jackson Community College (MI)

Kingsborough Community College (CUNY)

Scott Community College (IA)

Tulsa Community College (OK)

Wharton County Junior College (TX)

WorWic Community College (MD)

slide35

Community College Baltimore County

L

P

A

thanks for your attention

T h e A c c e l e r a t e d L e a r n i n g P r o j e c t