philosophy today l.
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Philosophy Today

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 18

Philosophy Today - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Philosophy Today. Philosophy 1 Spring, 2002 G. J. Mattey. The Great Divide. Most contemporary philosophers follow one of two approaches “Continental” philosophy “Analytic” philosophy Continental philosophy is more influential on the European continent

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Philosophy Today' - verdad

Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
philosophy today

Philosophy Today

Philosophy 1

Spring, 2002

G. J. Mattey

the great divide
The Great Divide
  • Most contemporary philosophers follow one of two approaches
    • “Continental” philosophy
    • “Analytic” philosophy
  • Continental philosophy is more influential on the European continent
  • Analytic philosophy is predominant in the major research universities in the English-speaking world
analytic philosophy
Analytic Philosophy
  • Analytic philosophy developed from attempts in the early 20th century to make our concepts precise
  • The model of this procedure was science
  • Rudolf Carnap (1891-1970) was a leading positivist, who held that what is not analytic or scientifically verifiable is meaningless
  • Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951) eventually held that analyses do not yield precise results and held that philosophy is merely therapeutic
analytic philosophy today
Analytic Philosophy Today
  • Emphasis in contemporary analytic philosophy is on language and meaning, and meaning is understood as a relation between language and objective reality
  • Thus, understanding the structure of language is what reveals the structure of reality
  • We now have powerful symbolic tools to aid us
  • Saul Kripke (1940- ) led a revival of metaphysics by making hyper-scientific concepts precise
continental philosophy
Continental Philosophy
  • Immanuel Kant’s “Copernican revolution” made the human point of view primary
  • This revolution was carried on German philosophers in the 19th century, culminating in Nietzsche
  • In the early 20th century, Edmund Husserl invented “phenomenology”
  • This was developed by Martin Heidegger and Sartre into “existentialism”
continental philosophy today
Continental Philosophy Today
  • Work in phenomenology and existentialism continues to be done
  • The main thrust in continental philosophy today follows Nietzsche
    • Michel Foucault (1926-1984) understood knowledge as practice, and practice as based on relations of power
    • Jacques Derrida (1930- ) promotes “deconstruction” and opposes “logocentrism”
academic culture clash
Academic Culture Clash
  • Analytic philosophers accuse continental philosophers of sloppy, or even meaningless, thinking
  • Continental philosophers accuse analytic philosophers of petty narrowness and detachment from real human concerns
roots of the clash
Roots of the Clash
  • The clash between contemporary continental and analytic philosophers is foreshadowed in the clash between the Sophists and Socrates
  • The Sophists emphasized the use of language as a tool to further human interest, but not as revealing an objective reality
  • Socrates demanded an account of the real form which provides the meaning of the use of concepts
formal philosophy
Formal Philosophy
  • Symbolic logic allows the formulation of philosophical statements and arguments in a rigorous, unambiguous format
    • Leibniz was the first philosopher to try this
    • Russell’s 1905 “On Denoting” showed its great potential
  • Probability calculus is a formalization of principles of inductive reasoning
    • Decision theory is based on probability calculus
what analytic philosophers do
What Analytic Philosophers Do
  • Conceptual analysis is done in the style of the Euthyphro
    • E.g., knowledge is justified true belief that is not accidental
  • Philosophical theories are constructed in the style of Utilitarianism or Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals
  • Much activity is directed at the question of the possibility of analysis and theorizing
reflective equilibrium
Reflective Equilibrium
  • Mill posed the problem of the analysis of ethical judgments
    • We need to know what right and wrong are before we can judge an act right or wrong
    • But scientific method requires that we know particulars first
  • Nelson Goodman proposed a solution
    • Begin with our beliefs about particulars
    • Determine how well they conform to general beliefs
    • Reflectively adjust the two kinds of beliefs until they reach a state of equilibrium
issues in metaphysics
Issues in Metaphysics
  • Most current issues in analytic metaphysics are the same as the classical issues
    • Are universals and numbers real, or are concrete particulars the only reality?
    • Is causality only constant conjunction or a real relation?
    • Can things be other than what they actually are, or are they determined to be what they are?
  • Many philosophers are attracted to the view that the human mind is a material entity
  • But there are problems in explaining mental activity as identical to brain states, etc.
  • A proposed solution is that mental activity supervenes on physical states of the body
    • Two brain states of the same type cannot differ with respect to the associated mental activity
issues in epistemology
Issues in Epistemology
  • How should knowledge be analyzed?
  • Should we approach knowledge inside-out (Descartes, Hume, Russell) or outside-in, so that human knowledge is a natural development to be studied scientifically?
  • How do we make sense of the persuasive power of philosophical skepticism?
  • We seem to assume that we have knowledge ordinarily but take back that assumption when thinking of skeptical arguments
  • This can be explained by claiming that we have knowledge in the ordinary context but lose it in the skeptical context
  • This is similar to Hume’s view that we have belief in the ordinary context and lose our confidence when thinking of skeptical arguments
issues in ethics
Issues in Ethics
  • Ethical investigations tend to be centered on one of three levels
    • Meta-ethics concerns questions about the nature of moral values and how they can be known
    • Ethical theories include utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelian-style virtue ethics
    • Moral problems (e.g. abortion) are discussed in their own right or in relation to theories
the difference principle
The Difference Principle
  • John Rawls has proposed a conception of justice as fairness
    • In the case of distributive justice, justice is fair distribution of the goods of society
  • But what is fair?
    • We should conceive of ourselves as in a position of ignorance regarding our position in society
    • In such a position, it would be reasonable for each of us to require that if a distribution is unequal, it must help the least advantaged
  • Has analytic philosophy made any progress?
  • Philosophical problems, analyses and theories are subject to much more sophisticated and detailed treatment
  • They tend, however, to be examined piecemeal, and not as part of a broader theoretical context
  • Philosophers seem as far from agreement on more basic issues as they ever have been, even with all the new tools at their disposal