1 / 93

Jeffrey Keefe Rutgers University

Even an Unnecessary Crisis Created an Opportunity to Apply the Shock Doctrine: The U.S. States' Fiscal Crisis and the Attack on Collective Bargaining Rights of Public Employees. Jeffrey Keefe Rutgers University. Great Recession 2007-?.

verda
Download Presentation

Jeffrey Keefe Rutgers University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Even an Unnecessary Crisis Created an Opportunity to Apply the Shock Doctrine:The U.S. States' Fiscal Crisis and the Attack on Collective Bargaining Rights of Public Employees Jeffrey Keefe Rutgers University

  2. Great Recession 2007-? • Great Recession officially began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009, according to the NBER. • Over the course of the recession, the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) went from $13.4 trillion during the fourth quarter of 2007 to $12.8 trillion in the second quarter of 2009, a decline of 4.1 percent. • Since the official end of the recession in June 2009, the GDP has reversed its decline and as of the first quarter of 2011, it surpassed pre-recession levels.

  3. Recession Ends Without Jobs Recovery • Total private employment declined by 10% (a loss of 11.7 million jobs) from June 2007 to January 2010. • In April 2013, private employment had partially recovered but was still down 3% (3.4 million jobs). • Lagging the decline in private employment, state and local government employment began its decline in July 2008 and has continued to decline through April 2013, with a loss of 726,000 jobs (3.7% of employment).

  4. State Budget Problems Emerge in 2008 • During the 2009 fiscal year, 43 states faced budget gaps totaling more than $60 billion (National Conference of State Legislatures 2009). • By December 2008, 22 states had made or announced cuts to their expenditures totaling $12 billion. • By July 2009, 42 states had made cuts to their expenditures totaling more than $30 billion, and 30 states had increased taxes or fees to boost their revenues

  5. 7

  6. States’ Budgets Changes Source: National Governor’s Association, Fiscal Survey of the States Fall 2012

  7. Pro-Cyclical State Revenue Changes Source: National Governor’s Association, Fiscal Survey of the States Fall 2012

  8. Pro-Cyclical State Budget Cuts Source: National Governor’s Association, Fiscal Survey of the States Fall 2012

  9. Report of the State Budget Task Force July 2012

  10. Federal Support to States Declines in 2011 • The ARRA provided increased grant funding for education, Medicaid, transportation, energy, water, and other programs. • Most provisions of the Recovery Act expired in 2010 but some were extended in August 2010 to provide education and Medicaid assistance to States in 2011. • The total fiscal relief provided to the states by the Recovery Act was $141.1 billion from 2009 to 2011. • In 2011, Federal aid to states decreased by $1.6 billion from 2010. • In 2012, state annual appropriations were estimated to decrease by $25 billion from 2011.

  11. Did State Fiscal Relief During Recessions Increase Employment? Evidence from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act • The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 included $88 billion of aid to state governments administered through the Medicaid reimbursement process. • Baseline econometric specifications suggest that $100,000 of marginal spending by states increased employment by 3.8 job-years, 3.2 of which are outside the government, health, and education sectors. • Gabriel Chodorow-Reich, Laura Feiveson, Zachary Liscow, and William Gui Woolston August 2011

  12. Do US Elites Want Full-Employment? • 2010- Record Profit Share, Declining Labor Share • 2013 Record Stock Market Valuations • 2009- Record Low Bond Rates • Little Inflation • Decline in Federal Budget Deficits • Labor Costs Decline • No Restructurings or Indictments for Too Big-To- Fail Banks or Bankers

  13. What Do You Do, If You Are a Republican Governor in 2010 • State Faces a Massive Revenue Shortfall • Oppose any Federal Stimulus • Refuse to Increase Taxes or Fees • Advocate Tax Cuts to Restore the Economy • And States Are Constitutionally Required to Balance the Budget?

  14. New Jersey Republicans Devise a Governing Strategy The election of Chris Christie in 2009 challenges how to govern without revenue

  15. Christie on the Attack • Christie portrayed overpaid public employees as the chief cause for rising property taxes and the only fair solution was to roll back taxes by insisting public employees accept less. • His anger and outrage was focused on the 200,000-member NJEA. On April 5, 2011 on national television, Christie described the New Jersey Education Association leaders as a "group of political thugs." • In June 2010, he eventually passed a state budget with the help of a stunned Democratic majority legislature that capped property taxes at 2% annual increases for three years, and greatly reduced the state’s support for schools and municipalities.

  16. It's time: Freeze N.J. public workers' pay, change bargaining rules. Star-Ledger Editorial Board/The Star-Ledger. Feb 28, 2010 24

  17. In the Fall of 2010 NJ Reform of Collective Bargaining • Both Governor Christie and the Star Ledger targeted collective bargaining for reform. • Their concern, however, was not basic collective bargaining rights, but police and fire interest arbitration. • They argued interest arbitration produce exorbitantly expensive contracts, because arbitrators were giving greater weight to community pay comparisons rather than the government’s ability to pay when fashioning awards. • They sought a series of reforms, including capping wage increases to 2% per year. • The reforms were enacted into law in December 2010

  18. Narrowing the Scope of a Narrow Scope Collective Bargaining Law • Pension were never covered by collective bargaining • In June 2011, employee contributions were significantly increased for all defined benefit plans. • Health Insurance was bargainable, but in June 2011 legislation structured employee contributions for the next four years effectively removing health insurance from bargaining. • Democrats insured employee contributions were progressive ranging from 10% to 35%.

  19. Source Statistical Abstract of the United States Rank 2 Rank 2 Rank 1 27

  20. The Spring Offensive of 2011 And the Public Responses

  21. Wisconsin’s Budget Repair Bill • The most onerous collective bargaining law was passed in Wisconsin as part of the "Budget-Repair Bill" introduced on February 15, 2011. • The Wisconsin law for non-public safety employees limits bargaining to only one subject: wages, which is limited to only base wages and excludes any other wage or compensation issue. • The law also requires annual union certification elections by bargaining unit, prohibits dues deduction by any public employer, prohibits union security clauses, mandates one year non-renewable contracts, repeals interest arbitration, outlaws all strikes, and repeals collective bargaining rights for the University of Wisconsin System faculty and academic staff

  22. Ohio SB5 • The Ohio State Senate passed SB 5 with a vote of seventeen to sixteen, and then the bill passed the House by a margin of fifty-three to forty-four. • After reconciliation, it was signed into law on March 31 , 2011, by newly elected Governor John Kasich.

  23. Michigan 2011 • Michigan Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act of 2011 (Malin 2013) that was signed into law by newly elected Republican Governor Rick Snyder on March 16, 2011. • It permits the governor to appoint an emergency manager who, among other things, has the power to reject all or part of a collective bargaining agreement upon finding that there is a financial emergency. • Additionally, the emergency manager can remove elected officials, privatize services, and sell public assets

  24. What Did the Public Think? Are Public Employees Overpaid?

  25. Gallup: More Americans Back Unions Than Governors in State Disputes by 48% to 39%

  26. WSJ/NBC 68% 63% 58% 33%

  27. Summary of National Polls Spring 2011

  28. Labor’s Response Collective Bargaining?

  29. Five Dead in Ohio • The repeal of Ohio Senate Bill 5 appeared on the November 8, 2011, general election ballot. • Senate Bill 5 was defeated by a margin of 2,145,042 (61.3)% to 1,352,366 (38.7%). • Senate Bill 5 would have greatly limited the collective bargaining rights of Ohio's 525,000 state and local public employees.

  30. Wisconsin Recalls • The enactment of the law lead to numerous political and legal battles between the Governor Scott Walker, and a reinvigorated labor movement in coalition with many community organizations. • Walker survived a recall vote in June 2012; however, the majority of the state Senate switched back to Democratic control through the recall process

  31. Michigan’s Referendum • While the opponents won the referendum, to end Michigan Local Government and School District Fiscal Accountability Act of 2011 • Governor Snyder then used the lame duck Republican legislature to pass a modified Emergency Manager Law, and the City of Detroit has since been placed under its requirements. • Referendum on a Constitutional Amendment to include collective bargaining rights failed. • The lame duck legislature passed a Michigan Right to Work Law. • The City of Detroit has filed for Bankruptcy challenging its pension obligations for current and former employees

  32. Michigan’s Clever New Law • The new bill offers financially troubled local governments the ability to choose from four options: accept an emergency manager, undergo bankruptcy, enter into a mediation process, or join the state in a partnership under a consent agreement. • Choosing one of these options is mandatory if the local government meets the Bill's criteria, it is not allowed to opt out of the program. • Though the Bill’s governor oversight is essentially what voters rejected during the 2012 general election, the new bill is not subject to referendum because it contains appropriations in the form of providing for emergency managers' salaries.

  33. Why the Criticism of Public Employment and Employees? Is There Too Much Government?

More Related