890 likes | 928 Views
Explore the captivating history and concepts of equilibrium in game theory, from John Nash to Oskar Morgenstern's contributions. Delve into the intellectual battle of Sherlock Holmes versus Moriarty and the intricacies of poker scenarios. Understand Nash Equilibrium and rational player assumptions in strategic decision-making. Discover the dynamics of two-person games and how equilibrium solutions are derived. Unveil the art of maximizing minimal payoffs and the significance of strategic bluffs and raises. Engage in thought-provoking discussions on game theory and decision-making.
E N D
A short history of equilibrium John Nash and Game Theory
Oskar Morgenstern • Institut für Konjunkturforschung
Oskar Morgenstern • Institut für Konjunkturforschung • Sherlock Holmes vs. Moriarty
Oskar Morgenstern • Institut für Konjunkturforschung • Sherlock Holmes vs. Moriarty • London -- Canterbury -- Dover
John von Neumann Zur Theorie der Gesellschaftsspiele (1928)
Poker for Beginners • Two players, Johnny and Oskar • Two cards, King and Ace
Poker for Beginners • Two players, Johnny and Oskar • Two cards, King and Ace • Stakes one dollar each • Johnny draws a card
Poker for Beginners • Two players, Johnny and Oskar • Two cards, King and Ace • Stakes one dollar each • Johnny draws a card • Johnny gives up: Oskar wins • Johnny raises stakes: another dollar
Poker for Beginners • Two players, Johnny and Oskar • Two cards, King and Ace • Stakes one dollar each • Johnny draws a card • Johnny gives up: Oskar wins • Johnny raises stakes: another dollar • Oskar gives up: Johnny wins • Oskar raises: Johnny shows card
Poker for Beginners • Johnny can • bluff (raise even with king)
Poker for Beginners • Johnny can • bluff (raise even with king) • not bluff (raise only with ace)
Poker for Beginners • Johnny can • bluff (raise even with king) • not bluff (raise only with ace) • Oskar can • raise if Johnny raises
Poker for Beginners • Johnny can • bluff (raise even with king) • not bluff (raise only with ace) • Oskar can • raise if Johnny raises • give up if Johnny raises
Poker for Beginners • Johnny: maximize minimal payoff • Johnny bluffs with probability 1/3
Poker for Beginners • Johnny: maximize minimal payoff • Johnny bluffs with probability 1/3 • Oskar: maximize minimal payoff • (= minimize Johnny‘s maximal payof) • Oskar raises with probability 2/3
Poker for Beginners • Maximize minimal payoff • Johnny bluffs with probability 1/3 • Oskar raises with probability 2/3 • none can improve
Poker for Beginners • Maximize minimal payoff • Johnny bluffs with probability 1/3 • Oskar raises with probability 1/3 • none can improve • Morgenstern‘s example has a solution!
But: • Why be a pessimist?
But: • Why be a pessimist? • Why only zero sum games?
Chicken for Beginners • Maximin: yield
Chicken for Beginners • Maximin: yield • not consistent! • If the co-player yields, escalate!
Chicken for Beginners • Maximin: yield • not consistent! • If the co-player yields, escalate! • If both yield with probability 9/10, • none can improve
Nash-Equilibrium • Arbitrarily many players • each has arbitrarily many strategies
Nash-Equilibrium • Arbitrarily many players • each has arbitrarily many strategies • there always exists an equilibrium solution
Nash-Equilibrium • Arbitrarily many players • each has arbitrarily many strategies • there always exists an equilibrium solution • no player can improve payoff by deviating • each strategy best reply to the others
Nash-Equilibrium • Arbitrarily many players • each has arbitrarily many strategies • there always exists an equilibrium solution • no player can improve payoff by deviating • each strategy best reply to the others • if zero-sum game: maximin solution
Nash-Equilibrium • Presumes rational players
Nash-Equilibrium • Presumes rational players • is unstable: • if others deviate, it may be better to also deviate