1 / 14

CALICE Status

CALICE Status. Paul Dauncey Imperial College London For the CALICE-UK groups: Birmingham, Cambridge, Imperial, Manchester, RAL, UCL. The CALICE collaboration. Study calorimetry for a future linear collider Both electromagnetic ( ECAL ) and hadronic ( HCAL )

vegal
Download Presentation

CALICE Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CALICE Status Paul Dauncey Imperial College London For the CALICE-UK groups: Birmingham, Cambridge, Imperial, Manchester, RAL, UCL Paul Dauncey - Calice Status

  2. The CALICE collaboration Study calorimetry for a future linear collider • Both electromagnetic (ECAL) and hadronic (HCAL) • ECAL studies are for Si-W tracking calorimeter • HCAL studies are for analogue scintillating tile or digital (small cell) made with RPC’s, scintillating tiles or GEM’s • Big collaboration already… • 150 people, 24 institutes, 8 countries (including Europe, US and Asia) • DESY is a member (CALICE grew out of TESLA TDR studies) • …and still expanding • 6 institutes have joined since the last LCUK meeting • FNAL have also approached the collaboration • Informal agreement on collaboration with SLAC/Oregon • Recent summary of status written for DESY PRC in October • Can find from CALICE-UK page http://www.hep.ph.imperial.ac.uk/calice/ Paul Dauncey - Calice Status

  3. CALICE beam test Major aim is beam test • ECAL 202020cm3 • 30 layers of tungsten • 9720 Si diode pads with analogue readout • HCAL 111m3 • 38 layers of iron • 15000 55cm2 scintillator pads with analogue readout, OR • 350000 11cm2 RPC, scintillator or GEM pads with digital readout • Timescale is short • mid 2004 – mid 2005 Paul Dauncey - Calice Status

  4. CALICE-UK approval UK project (finally!) approved in Dec 2002 • Funding only for two full FY’s, not the three requested • Funds up to March 2005; cannot complete beam test or do analysis! • Can reapply to extend in ~18 months • Equipment fund sufficient to build ECAL electronics • We will design and build VME boards and DAQ system for beam test • Hope to use same boards for HCAL readout (analogue and digital) • Full effort request granted for engineering from Rutherford Laboratory • New engineer (Adam Baird, RAL) has now joined the project • One RA post for two years at Cambridge • For simulation work, the other part of the UK involvement • Travel money for the two FY’s Paul Dauncey - Calice Status

  5. CALICE-UK simulation studies Two sets of studies going on • Jet resolution is major driver for fine-grained calorimetry • Simulation indicates required 30%/E is achievable using energy flow… • …but simulation needs to be verified • Hadronic interactions known to be difficult to model • Compare Geant3/Geant4/Fluka predictions • Birmingham and Cambridge groups • Beam energy spread will be significant • Luminosity will need to be known as a function of s • Bhabha rate is high and (obviously) depends directly on luminosity • Measure s for each event from acollinearity angle of e+ and e– • Could use tracker only but need very high efficiency at low angles • UCL group Paul Dauncey - Calice Status

  6. Geant3/Geant4 electron comparisons Expect EM response to be modelled well • Use beam test configuration for studies • Direct comparison to data when available • Agreement is reasonable after tuning • Low energy cut-offs • Production of -rays Paul Dauncey - Calice Status

  7. Geant3/Geant4 pion comparisons Did not expect hadronic response to be as good • Pion beam agreement also pretty reasonable after same tuning • Comparable to (better than?) electrons Paul Dauncey - Calice Status

  8. Geant3/Geant4 proton comparisons Protons show much worse agreement • Small nucleon component in all jets • Causes almost all of small discrepancy in pion jets • Importance of using proton test beam • Not previously recognised Data may be different from both models! Paul Dauncey - Calice Status

  9. CALICE-UK electronics work • Effort from several groups in ECAL readout electronics • Imperial, Manchester, UCL • Following approval, RAL TD became involved; brought experience of CMS tracker • Significant knowledge of design of Front End Driver (FED) • Readout board for CMS silicon tracker • Around 500 boards needed for whole tracking system • FED architecture close to proposed CALICE board • Data gathering and control almost identical • Actual data input technology very different; CMS use fibre • FED design is quite advanced • Physical board layout complete, firmware designs in progress • Two “final-specification” prototypes received two weeks ago and currently undergoing tests Will now use FED as a starting point for CALICE Paul Dauncey - Calice Status

  10. Original proposed system Readout board most complex part • Each cable handled by slave FPGA • Whole board controlled by master FPGA 15 readout boards • Each handles digitisation of 2 layers 1 trigger board • Holds off further triggers until readout complete 1 test board (not shown) • For testing cable connections of readout board Paul Dauncey - Calice Status

  11. 5V 3.3V Run/Halt Config E2PROM Id E2 Prom 1.5V 0V 3.3V Compact Flash 1 5V 3.3V 1.5V 1 Test Connector 1 VME LEDs 4x Prog Delay 1 Dual ADC 12x Opto Rx 1 Power Good PD Array VME64x Interface FPGA FPGA Synch & Processing Boundary Scan System ACE Buffer Jumper Matrix -5V ASIC Vref 12x trim dac VME FE 1 3 6 4x Prog Delay +12V 12 Dual ADC LEDs +5V Temp Sense Front End FPGA +3.3V FPGA Temp Sense Clock Control Data 2.5V 1.5V +2.5V 0V LEDs 2 +1.5V QDR SSRAM -5.0V spare Over temp LEDs TTS TTCrx TTC DAQ ASIC Readout & Synch Control FLT LEDs EMU FSYNC Spare Process Back End FPGA LEDs Transfer VME Temp Sense 43 85 Clock Control Data 22 Readout 4x Prog Delay 3.3V 1.5V Dual ADC 8 Busy 12x Opto Rx 8 LEDs error PD Array FPGA halted Synch & Processing 12x trim dac ASIC Vref FE 8 Master  BE +VME; very similar 24 4x Prog Delay 5.0 V 48 96 E-Fuse Hot swap DC-DC 3.3 V Dual ADC Front End FPGA FPGA 2.5V PD Temp Sense Slave  FE; need to rewrite firmware 1.5V -5.0V extract ADCs, etc; totally different Hot swap cycle SW Live extract request SW FED board compared to readout board Paul Dauncey - Calice Status

  12. FED layout • Ideally • Keep everything to the right • Redo everything to the left • FED is bigger • More £ per board • More channels per board also • Total cost approximately the same • Saving is on schedule and effort Paul Dauncey - Calice Status

  13. ECAL electronics schedule 2003 2004 Paul Dauncey - Calice Status

  14. CALICE summary • CALICE as a whole is still growing • Dominating the LC calorimetry community • CALICE-UK is finally approved • Not everything we wanted (yet) • Will keep us going for the next two years • Simulation studies producing useful results • Indicating the importance of proton beams • Ensures beam test will be sensitive to most critical issues • Electronics getting close to producing hardware • Now based on CMS FED board; cost neutral but less effort needed • Should have prototypes this summer, final boards early in 2004 Paul Dauncey - Calice Status

More Related