1 / 63

Language Organization Classic model

Language Organization Classic model. Sensory perception--comprehension (WA)--Broca ’ s (formulation, motor plan)--motor cortex (final common pathway). Language Organization Classic model. Sensory perception--comprehension (WA)--Broca ’ s

veata
Download Presentation

Language Organization Classic model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Language OrganizationClassic model Sensory perception--comprehension (WA)--Broca’s (formulation, motor plan)--motor cortex (final common pathway)

  2. Language OrganizationClassic model Sensory perception--comprehension (WA)--Broca’s (formulation, motor plan)--motor cortex (final common pathway)

  3. Classical conception of aphasia. Paul Broca (1824-1880). Communication a la Societe d’Anthropologie (1865)” Je vous ai communique…….dix observations d’aphemie dans lesquelles on a trouve a l’autopsie des lesions diverses de la 3me circonvolution frontale…..Je persiste a penser que l’aphemie verbale, c’est a dire la perte de la parole sans paralysie des organes de l’articulation et sans destruction de l’intelligence est liee aux lesions de la 3me circonvolution frontale. Ma communication est relative a la singuliere predilection de l’aphemie pour l’hemisphere gauche du cerveau” Mr.Leborgne =Tan-Tan died 4/17/1861

  4. Mr. Leborgne died 4-17-1861 11am at the age of 51. MRI of Leborgne 4-15-1994

  5. Voxel-based Lesion-Symptom Mapping (VLSM): sample maps Fluency Comprehension Bates, Wilson, Saygin, Dick, Sereno, Knight & Dronkers, 2002

  6. Disruption model of language function “Broca’s Area”: PIFG “Wernicke’s area”: PT/IP Reading Area: Angular Gyrus Basal Temporal Language Area

  7. Frontal regions 44 inf 44/6 9/6 Exners area 46 45 47 6 medial Temporal regions 41/42 22 21/20 37 Parietal: 40 39

  8. 1 1 2 2 3 5 8 4 6 6 3 3 7 7 6 9 9 10 10 8

  9. Basal Temporal Language Area • Mills Naming Center; Nielson’s language formulation center • Involved in object naming • Lesion: Pure anomic aphasia • Category specificity in more anterior areas • Believe pathways project ant/sup through insula 1 1

  10. BTLA is difficult to image: • Major artifacts; need to indicate where you haven’t signal- false negative risk • Object naming area: verb generation is NOT a good activator of this region

  11. Wernicke’s area(s) • Inferior portion: middle temporal gyrus/superior temporal sulcus • Often bilateral activation • Superior portion: superior temporal gyrus/supramarginal gyrus • Posterior/adjacent to TTG 2 2 3 3

  12. Wernicke’s area(s) • Critical for auditory language comprehension; word recognition, sequencing phonemes • Lesions: grammatic speech; multiple paraphasias; • Superior lesions: phoneme selection deficits, sequencing deficits; reading problems • Activations often quite deep in sulci • Output travels posterior and superior in arcuate fasciculus • Lesions of white matter tracts into and out of the region can lead to serious deficits;These can be quite distal to the cortical processing areas • Object naming, word generation --poor activators

  13. Arcuate fasciculushttp://da.biostr.washington.edu/da.html

  14. Frontal language areas 5 8 4 6 6 6 9 9 10 10

  15. Bookheimer 2003 Annual Rev. Neurosci.

  16. Orbital frontal cortex: 47/45 • Arguments about its job: semantics; verbal selection; selection generally • Integration of (semantic) information • Lesion/electrical stimulation: semantic integration deficits: normal object naming, grammatic speech; impaired auditory responsive naming 4

  17. “Broca’s” area: 44 and 45 • Superior to IFS/PCS border, inferior to sylvian • Focal region; variable in precise location; some language specificity • Must exist! • Lesions: grammatic output; naming; generation; phoneme monitoring; syntax comprehension; effortful speech; arrest or anomia with stimulation 6

  18. A B

  19. Phonology in IFG Gelfand and Bookheimer, Neuron 2002

  20. reverse delete match

  21. Exner’s Area • 6/8 in MFG/PMC • Associated with pure agraphia • Appears in many tasks 7 8

  22. Longcamp et al NeuroImage 2003

  23. Exner’s area vs FEF Phoneme to grapheme task; saccades Matsuo et al Neurosci Lett 2003 Exner’s FEF

  24. Stimulated region Tumor Stimulated region

  25. Angular Gyrus • Critical for reading • Integrates auditory and visual information • Pathways from IT to AG, oCC-AG, AG-SMG, all vulnerable 7 Reading phrases

  26. Supplementary Speech Area (Pre-SMA, Speech SMA) • Important in initiating a motor speech plan • When removed, get a complete arrest of speech; lesions may reduce initiation or lead to a “dwindling aphasia”; comprehension is normal • Easily reorganizes to intact RH when the callosum is intact- 1-3 weeks 10

  27. Anterior Insula • Very often bilaterally symmetric • When lesioned bilaterally (and selectively): pure apraxia of speech • Lesions of area (nearby white matter, IFG, striatum) lead to profound expressive aphasia • Do not use to establish laterality; don’t recommend to remove it either 5

  28. Dorsolateral Pre-frontal Cortex • Not a language area • Will show activation, sometimes unilateral, especially on generation tasks • Lesions show reduced fluency; stimulation often produces perseverations • Don’t use for laterality; often removed in surgery 8

  29. Language 2 • Reading system and reading disorders • Right hemisphere contributions to language • Prosody • context

  30. Reading System • Major issue in reading: 1 or 2 pathways • Call this the Dual Route model • Was controversial before functional imaging- now its pretty well accepted • Based on differences in acquired alexia errors

  31. Types of Alexia • Phonologica, literal or Surface • Patients read in a letter-by-letter fashion • They sound out each word • Errors: they can read pronounceable nonsense words “migbus”; cannot read irregular words like “yacht” • Damage likely to the visual recognition system in the LH: cant recognize whole words

  32. Alexia cont. • Alexia type 2: visual, semantic alexia • Can read whole words • Can read irregulars like yacht and pharoah • Cannot read nonsense words • Strong frequency effect- more likely to read common than uncommon words; better at concrete nouns • Make visual or regularization errors: lit = light; groal=goal, etc. • Apparently have damage to phonological to orthographic conversion system or to phonological system

  33. Rarer alexias • Global alexia: affects all reading. AG lesions or WM exiting visual cortex in LH • Deep dyslexia: associated with large LH lesions- characterized by global dyslexia with: • Visual errors: gird=“girl” • Derivational errors: architecture= architect • Semantic errors: orchestra=symphony • Superior at reading concrete nouns • Suggested to represent some primitive RH whole word recognition capabilities

  34. Rarer alexias, cont. • Alexia without agraphia or occipital alexia: • Most other acquired alexics have impaired writing similar to reading • Alexia without agraphia associated with 2 lesions: one in the left occipital cortex and one in the posterior callosum • Disruption of visual information into the LH reading system. Usually accompanied by a field or quadrant cut • Can write, but cant read what they write

  35. Developmental dyslexia • Most are similar to the surface alexic • Difficulty with auditory processing • Poor at grapheme to phoneme conversion • Lousy at reading nonwords • Slow readers; often learn by whole-word approach • Rarer, there are visual types and often some with general language difficulties

  36. Anatomy of Reading Inferior Frontal Gyrus Supramarginal Gyrus (40) Angular Gyrus (39) Superior Temporal Gyrus (posterior)42,41;22 Temporal/Occipital Junction 21/20/37

  37. Dual Routes • Inferior Route: • Occipital V1-V2-V3-IT-insula/44/47 • Superior Route • V1-V2- AG-ST- IFG 44/6 • Interaction through AG • Writing: includes SMG and Exner’s area (46/6 anterior to M1 hand)

  38. Right hemisphere contributions to language • Some evidence that early right brain lesions can be more detrimental to language development than LH lesions • LH may process more rapid information. RH may maintain a context and provide emotional cues to global meaning • Some evidence that the ear itself is tuned for more rapid auditory information in LH or infants (Sininger 2004 Science).

  39. Prosody Paradigm • Selective attention/stimulus matched paradigm • For the 2 prosody conditions: • “Do the sentences sound alike” regardless of literal meaning • For the SC condition: • “Do the sentences mean the same thing” regardless of the sound

  40. Affective prosody vs. others

  41. Linguistic vs. Affective

More Related