1 / 12

STRATINC Interreg III C: Tenerife meeting

STRATINC Interreg III C: Tenerife meeting. The Oslo Biotech Cluster. Knut Halvorsen Manager Oslo Teknopol IKS 7th and 8 th April 2005. Background. High indirect independency on petroleum (”Kuwait” economy) Science based region (50% of Norways R&D) Low innovation rate (2 – 3% from R&D).

Download Presentation

STRATINC Interreg III C: Tenerife meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. STRATINC Interreg III C: Tenerife meeting The Oslo Biotech Cluster Knut Halvorsen Manager Oslo Teknopol IKS 7th and 8 th April 2005

  2. Background • High indirect independency on petroleum (”Kuwait” economy) • Science based region (50% of Norways R&D) • Low innovation rate (2 – 3% from R&D)

  3. The process – RITTS • RITTS – Negotiations: Fall 1998 • Stage 0: Through 1999: Concensus • Stage 1: Though 2000 : Analysis • Stage 2: First half 2001: Implementation • Result: June 2001: Final report • Methodology: Internal and external experts • Organisation: Integrated in the main decision structure in the region.

  4. Defintion: Technopole • « Supporting a territorial development policy based on innovation, a technopole favours cross-fertilisation. Creation of innovative activities, animation and networking of competences, territorial marketing, are the components of the technopolitan dynamics » (France Technopoles Entreprises Innovation)

  5. Oslo Teknopol - organisation • Owned by Oslo and County of Akershus • 13 employees (social sciences) • Budget of NOK 16 mill. • Theoretical approach: Clusters • Strategy: Technopole • Methodology: Governance • Vision: Oslo Teknopol shall – in cooperation with others – work towards making the Osloregion one of the most innovative regions in Europa by 2010.

  6. The strategies: ”Bottom up” and Clusters • Martime, • Energy and Environment • ICT • Life Science, • Art and Design

  7. Clusters, interfaces and facilitators Energy & environmental technology Maritime Information & communication technology Art, design, film & architecture Life science TTO Innovation companies Innovation networks Reasearch Parks & incubators

  8. Life Science in the Oslo region – key players Symbols: Universities/higher education insitutions: 3 University hospitals: 5 Resarch instiutions including Centres of Excellence: 10 Science Parks: 2 Commercial inst: 3 Companies: 1 157 Regional networks: 3 Norwegian Bioindustry Association Medcoast Scandinavia Oslo/Göteborg Medicon Valley Stockholm/Copenhagen

  9. 4. Life science Leder: Professor Kaare Norum MedCoast Scandinavia OptiNose AS Glaxo Smith Kline Clavis Pharma Astra Zeneca Dynal Biotech ASA GE – Vingmed Ultrasound GenoMar ASA Biomedisinsk Innovasjon Dag Dvergsten AS Birkeland Innovasjon PubGene Bioteknologisenteret i Oslo Interagon Norges Vetrinærhøgskole Sim Surgery Høgskolen i Akershus Radiumhospitalets Forskningsstifelse Fondsfinans OT ved Knut Halvorsen og Therese HolmThorvaldsen

  10. Summary, challenges to be discussed • Complex institutional structure • Non codified knowledge • Do not share core business ideas • Trust (F2F meetings) • PSIPs is one of many tools.

More Related