1 / 13

IB at a Higher Level

IB at a Higher Level. Working with District/Regional Governments in the implementation of IB Programs. DISCLAIMER. Proposals discussed in this session are for the Purposes of furthering the evolution of IB’s on-going work with District/Higher governmental agencies

vail
Download Presentation

IB at a Higher Level

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IB at a Higher Level Working with District/Regional Governments in the implementation of IB Programs

  2. DISCLAIMER • Proposals discussed in this session are for the Purposes of furthering the evolution of IB’s on-going work with District/Higher governmental agencies • They are not part of any implementation program at present within/with the support of IBO • They have been formulated for the purposes of DISCUSSION ONLY

  3. ISSUES OF CONCERN • Interested Schools (Public) may not be the source of Final fiduciary authority to govern implementation of Program • Variety of Programs available present dilemna of opportunity(and possibly cost) at the District(higher authority level) e.g.MYP, DP,PYP, IBCC,others • Difference in strategies/opportunities for access-Private/Public result • Relationships between schools –Higher Authority in the implementation of IB programs are entirely dependent on the condtions in place-No formal mechanisms for training/consulting with IB are in place • Redundancy, lack of efficiency regarding staff allocations and resources, limited long-range planning opportunities, frequent changes in leadership/staff turnover

  4. Current authorization and Implementation Responsibilities Act School Higher Application A All Support only Application B All Support required Author Visit All Support to be evidenced PD All Support Discretionary Framework All Support Only

  5. SUGGESTED MODEL • Activity School Higher Apps A&B Possible Possible Author Visit Possible Possible PD Possible Possible Framework Possible Possible

  6. RATIONALE • Equity of Service Delivery Model-Private and Public • Recognition of authority in Public Systems • Potential of Matching Higher System needs with IB growth and development • Allowing for strategic growth of IB programs within single authorities. • Larger, more impact; scope of implementation,including the engagement of Governing body, with long range planning in mind • Needs assessment to better align, accommodate supporting practices, as well as identify and support practices and programs within a given area • Enhanced program articulation within jurisdiction as well as provide for the possibility of Public/Private articulation (i.e.Miami, Palm Beach County examples)

  7. SUGGESTED SERVICES • Complementing current offerings; • Current offering A-Workshops PD Level 3-Potentially developing Workshops for Admin /District staff looking at the Strategic Implementation of Programs(at all Levels of the continuum within a single authority)-Hawaii-2010, Baltimore-Dec 2011

  8. SUGGESTED SERVICES • Current option B- Expansion of Coaching Services -This would mean an expansion of current coaching offerings to include assigned District/Regional work to assist with long-range planning, PD, alignment, leadership coaches. -Reference/e.g-Jessica Arnold blog-connecting IB/AP practitioners

  9. SUGGESTED SERVICES • Current Model C-District Services PD -Currently IB offers the possibilty of offering PD training at each level of the continuum at a District level-The offerings are negotiated with the District/Authority-The menu is from the current list of workshop possibilities(by subject/program area)e.g.Arizona 2010,Halifax 2010, DC,2011

  10. SUGGESTED SERVICES • Current Model C-(proposed future additions) Current District Services Workshops would add a series of sessions designed to: -Find the match of District(Authority) Mission/Values /Goals with IB -Identify IB Program offerings which would assist District/Authority Mission and Goals -Assist in the identification of a District Strat Plan which would facilitate the implementation of the Programs(Timeline /responsibilities and schools to be identified) -Assist in the creation of a long-range PD Plan for District/Authority

  11. Advantages -A direct role is assigned to a higher authority (in addition to support)- -Possibilities of aligning District/IB Goals and programs -Possibilities in Rationalizing costs of delivery at the District level -Complements Current offerings -Delivery of support can be focused regionally, with Specific services tailored to needs at the Local(District) level -Furthering IB’s access Goals-and potentially the higher authority’s own Goals Creation of a stronger network of support for teachers, school/District leaders-(PLC level?) with regular meetings,sharing of practice-under District coordination and support Allow for internal questions to be answered internally, creating more opportunity for true collaboration and development on IB related issues( e.g.global mindedness, critical thinking)

  12. Challenges • -Authorization Processes would potentially need to be re-examined • -Building a PD framework of support for the model • Readiness at the District/Authority level for the Model • Ensuring Pre-and Post Intervention assistance and support. • Readiness at IBO for re-design of District access

  13. Possible Discussion-for the end of our day • -What is the status in your region? • -Would these proposals address a need in your region?-Are they feasible? • Any additional thoughts/structures to suggest?

More Related