1 / 22

Long-Term Monitoring of Bacteria Undergoing Programmed Population Control in a Microchemostat

This critique explores the study by Balagaddé et al. (2005) on the use of a microchemostat for long-term monitoring and programmed population control of bacteria. The technology enables high-throughput experiments, reduced reagent costs, and automatic culturing of bacterial populations within a miniaturized bioreactor. While the study presents novel advancements, it also highlights key shortcomings, including unclear causes for loss of regulation and the need for more comprehensive methodologies. Overall, it emphasizes the potential of microchemostat systems in microbiological research.

vadin
Download Presentation

Long-Term Monitoring of Bacteria Undergoing Programmed Population Control in a Microchemostat

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Long-Term Monitoring of Bacteria Undergoing Programmed Population Control in a Microchemostat Frederick K. Balagaddé, Lingchong You, Carl L. Hansen, Frances H. Arnold, Stephen R. Quake Science, 309:137-140 (2005) Article critique presented by Véronique Lecault January 10, 2006 EECE 491c

  2. Cell sorting and analysis DNA microarrays Protein crystallization DNA amplification Immunoassays Electrophoresis Microfluidics: A Small World with Large Applications… (Thorsen et al., 2002) Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  3. Advantages: • Reduced reagent costs • High-throughput experiments • Cell tracking • Reduced waste • Increased speed of experiments Scaling Bioreactors Down to Nanoliters… Liters 1x109 1 1x106 1x10-6 1x10-3 1x103 1x10-9 Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  4. Batch • Fed-batch (semi continuous) • Chemostat (continuous) How do we culture cells? Number of bacteria Time Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  5. Bacteria and biofilms (www.medicdirect.co.uk) Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  6. Bacteria and biofilms Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  7. The Microchemostat Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  8. The Microchemostat Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  9. The Microchemostat Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  10. The Microchemostat 3 g/L 0.5 g/L 0.1 g/L Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  11. Quorum Sensing Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  12. Quorum Sensing Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  13. Quorum Sensing Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  14. Quorum Sensing IPTG - Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  15. Quorum Sensing IPTG + Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  16. MC4100Z1 Cells Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  17. Top10F’ Cells Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  18. Loss of Regulation MC4100Z1 Top10F’ Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  19. Population dynamics Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  20. Population dynamics Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  21. Conclusions • Operation of a miniaturized bioreactor 300 times smaller than the previous microfermentor. • Automatic culturing and monitoring of populations of 100 to 10000 bacteria with instantaneous cell resolution. • In theory, the mutation rate should be reduced by a factor of 105and prolong monitoring of homogeneous populations. • Monitoring the programmed behavior of bacterial population for hundred of hours despite strong selection pressure. Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

  22. Critique Summary • Experiments missing to explain what causes the loss of regulation • Could fit the model to data in order to estimate the true constants • Could put more emphasis on the absence of biofilm formation and on the limitations of the chemostat • Should compare mutation rates to a macroscale chemostat instead of a microscale batch • Very novel technology • Attempt to show a possible application • Honesty of the authors Major points • Clear representation of the microchemostat technology • Some figures are not very intuitive to read • Explanation missing for the morphological behavior • Incomplete Material and methods section leading to hardly reproducible experiments Minor points Balagaddé et al. (2005) Science 309:137-140

More Related