1 / 25

Aim

East Asian Social Policy Workshop (13 th – 15 th January 2005) Aging and Social Policy session The Impact of Long Term Care Insurance Act on the Provision of Personal Social Services for Older People – A Case Study in Japan –.

unity
Download Presentation

Aim

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. East Asian Social Policy Workshop(13th– 15th January 2005) Aging and Social Policy sessionThe Impact of Long Term Care Insurance Act on the Provision of Personal Social Services for Older People – A Case Study in Japan – Junko Yamashita Department of Social Policy and Social work The University of York

  2. Aim • To explore how recent policy reform, which intends topromote ‘socialization of care work & encourage care provision from the independent sector, have impacted on the functions of service delivery by Welfare Nonprofit Organisations (WNPO)operating in the field of personal social services for older people in Japan. • To evaluate the LTCI Act’s scope of service provision.

  3. The Structure of the Presentation • The historical context • The LTCI Act • The characteristics of WNPOs • Sampled WNPOs for the study • Is there any originality in the way WNPOs deliver services? Why? • What kinds of demands are WNPO’s responding to? Why?

  4. The increase in the numbers of WNPOs after the mid 1980s

  5. The emergence of WNPOs from the mid 1980s • ‘Socialised hospitalisation’ • Problematisation of the ‘burden’ upon the female family members • Groups from grass-root level began to be organised by women with the idea of mutual help. • Government also encouraged these activities.

  6. The Historical Context Demographic • The fastest ageing population and the longest life expectancy • Changes in household structure Political • ‘Japanese-style of welfare society’ in the end of 70s • Delaying proper preparation for the aging society.

  7. Japanese style of welfare society • Stop following Western models • Inventing a tradition • Opposing to the demographic trends The society has welfare programmes for the elderly with the burden of the tax prayer and it does not have the purpose that individuals do not need to take the responsibility. Its purpose is to be a ‘last rescue boat’ in such an exceptional case, that is, for those who do not have any relatives or their family do not have any ability to take the responsibility. If one might think they do not need to take care of their parents because the government or local authorities provide social welfare for them, this is completely mistaken. (Jiyu Minsyu To [Liberal Democrats Party] 1979 Study paper ‘Japanese-style welfare society)

  8. The policies concerning WNPOs • The Specified Nonprofit Activities Law 1998  access to a legal status became much easier • The Long Term Care Insurance Act 2000  - ‘Socialisation of care work’ - The emphasis on ‘user’s choice’ - Creation of a quasi-market of care provision - The Introduction of a social insurance system - The promotion of local autonomy

  9. Socialisation of care work • ‘enabling the frail older people to keep their autonomous life at home even without care provision from the family’(The Ministry of Health and Welfare 1998) • Japan becamethe first country in Asia whose government bears an essential part of the responsibility for the care provision of its older citizens.

  10. The Characteristics of WNPOs • Membership system Involving service providers and service users, 89% had membership system • Female participants 95 % of participants were middle-aged housewives  After 2000, more young women and men began to participate

  11. Monetary exchange Accepted fees for services A means to keep reciprocity between service providers and service users • Concentration in metropolitan areas

  12. Sampled WNPOs

  13. The role of WNPOs regarding service delivery • What is original about WNPO’s services? • What kinds of demands are WNPOs responding to?

  14. The originality of WNPO’s services • Cordiality • From user’s point of view • Responding to older people’s needs ? ? ? Under the LTCI Act it is difficult to differentiate between WNPO’s services and those of other organisation’s

  15. The originality of WNPO’s services Standardisation of Service Responding to User’s Needs Providing original services ‘Centre of WNPO’s activities’ Same services, but with low fees and Services are not authorised by the LTCI Act

  16. The originality of WNPO’s services Struggling to continue original services • Overwhelming administrative work for service provision under the LTCI Act • Financial rationality • Time consuming work respect for individual needs

  17. High demand for services assisting with domestic tasks The LTCI Act regards care assistant services much higher than domestic tasks Qualification and price private companies prefer to take care assistant services

  18. High demand for services assisting with domestic tasks • The re-evaluation of domestic tasks by WNPOs • Domestic tasks demand more hard work than care services • Standardised salary

  19. I thinks care assistant services are less demanding. You just need to follow patterns. But for domestic tasks, every user has their own way of doing it. (A member of management body of WNPO F) • Well, each house has its own way to do things, you know. Some people give us such detailed orders, such as preference of taste, or the way to wipe a table. (An active participant of WNPO A)

  20. Exclusion of men • The way of re-evaluating domestic tasks leads to discrimination barring man from participating in WNPOs • Services are counting on the experience women have of being a housewife • Men are not wanted

  21. Being a housewife for years makes a difference, doesn’t it? The experience of being a housewife for a couple of decades makes you ca[able of deciding what you will cook quickly, with looking at what is left in the fridge ( An active participants of WNPO A) • R: Are there any male participants in your group? Director of WNPO H: Not at all, not even one. R: Have you had any men who wanted to join your group as carer? Director of WNPO H: Yes, year there was. We didn’t reject him, but well, difficult, assisting domestic tasks is very difficult … He said he would do cooking form now on and master cooking. But you know, it does not take so much time and trouble for us to do cooking, I mean, making normal dishes … Actually there was no demand for him.

  22. Director of WNPO A : There are difficulties using a male carer. R: Why are there difficulties? Director of WNPO A : For example, for taking a walk for rehabilitation, men can do it, but you cannot take a walk together in silence… Particularly Young men do no have enough skill to be a good company for older people.

  23. Concluding Comments • WNPOs create a system of service provision and provide original services outside of the LTCI that respond to individual needs of older people which are not covered by the LTCI.

  24. Concluding Comments • WNPOs are meeting demands for services to assist domestic tasks • WNPOs re-evaluate the domestic tasks based on their practical experience of service provision

  25. Concluding Comments • The inextricable link between the way domestic tasks are re-evaluated and dis-qualification of domestic tasks by the LTCI exclude participation by men and young women • WNPOs are struggling to keep their original services, but if they do not run these services…….

More Related