1 / 15

African Research & Education Networking Workshop, CERN 25 – 27 Sept 2005

Association of African Universities (AAU) Bandwidth Initiative: Lessons, Gaps and Emerging Directions. African Research & Education Networking Workshop, CERN 25 – 27 Sept 2005 F F Tusubira and Nora K Mulira tusu@dicts.mak.ac.ug; nora@dicts.mak.ac.ug. Contents. The Starting Point.. Issues

umed
Download Presentation

African Research & Education Networking Workshop, CERN 25 – 27 Sept 2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Association of African Universities (AAU) Bandwidth Initiative:Lessons, Gaps and Emerging Directions African Research & Education Networking Workshop, CERN 25 – 27 Sept 2005 F F Tusubira and Nora K Mulira tusu@dicts.mak.ac.ug; nora@dicts.mak.ac.ug

  2. Contents .. • The Starting Point.. • Issues • Gaps, Lessons, and Emerging Direction

  3. The Starting Point.. • BAND-ITs, and AVU follow-on Reports • ATICS Report • PAREN Report • AUBC Discussion List • Discussions: IDRC; Sida, Connectivity Africa; Partnership for Higher Education in Africa; Association of African Universities • (T Blair) Commission for Africa Report • Our thinking; our experience; our commitment

  4. Issues Examined… • The Need for Bandwidth? • Pre-conditions for Efficient Exploitation • Capacity for efficient utilisation • Access to Internet vs Intra-African BW: detrench airline syndrome • Supply level management issues • Procurement issues • Consumer Consortia; Development Partner Consortia; Suppliers Consortia. • Different policy, regulatory, and technology environments

  5. Suppliers Consumers Development Partners A B C Levels: A-National; B-Regional; C-Continental The Challenge….

  6. Lessons, Gaps and Emerging Directions

  7. Cost and required intervention.. • Put cost in Perspective: 50 times more or de facto 5,000 time more? There are generic drugs but no generic bandwidth. • Relates to level and duration of financial intervention • No quick fix solution - Development partners will have to take the courageous and correct decision: if the intention is to create some measure of equity, sufficient resources must be invested, including recurrent support (on a phasing out basis), for some time

  8. Consumer Consortia Leadership • Identification of acceptable and relevant high level home a major challenge in any consortium • Key Requirements: Ownership and Trust • Association of African Universities is a widely accepted forum – legitimate home • AAU members formally decided to take on this initiative • Where/If there is lack of capacity, the sustainable approach is to build it, not to create parallel institutions

  9. Governance and Operations • Executive Council of 7 – Policy direction and monitoring: • Chair from AAU (Secretary General) • Representing AAU Members – 2 • Representing Continental policy level – 1 from either AU or NEPAD • Representing Development Partners – 2 • Representing multinational learning or research networks in Africa – 1 • Secretariat whose capacity has to be built • Short term – engage/contract an external party as Agent answerable to AAU.

  10. Combine Bottom up and Top Down (1) • Bottom Up: • Support the start or the strengthening of national level consortia/ integration, the basic building block • Support start or strengthening multi-national level integration through associations of institutions in politico-economic groupings (eg the Inter-University for East Africa in the EAC). • At the continental level, it is likely to be a marriage of common approaches rather than common solutions.

  11. Combine Bottom up and Top Down (2) • Top Down (AAU) • Spearhead a Master Plan that will provide both African Institutions and Development Partners with a coordinated and coherent implementation framework • Document and give guidance of best practice approaches • Mobilise funding • Be the continental implementing organisation

  12. Combine Bottom up and Top Down (3) • Top Down (AAU) - ctd • Lobby at the regional and continental level to promote favourable policy and regulatory frameworks • Work with consortia to increasingly add value until the main focus of consortia is the higher level motivation of networked learning, research and community outreach • Monitoring and evaluation

  13. Development Partners • Is it realistic to expect development partners to put funds into a common pot in the short term? No, but… • .. they will fund different elements of a coordinated master plan, with entry points at the institutional, national, or multi-national level • Should come out clearly with their positions to avoid false starts.. • Should cede, and be seen to cede direction and control to the African institutions (within an agreed framework)

  14. Setting the ball rolling ..(1) • Acceptance by the stakeholders of AAU as the home of the initiative • Defining and establishment of the Executive Council under the auspices of the AAU. (Put in place an Interim Executive Council chaired by the Secretary General of the AAU) • Establishment of a lean secretariat • Definition of the Master Plan

  15. Setting the ball rolling ..(2) • Discussion and Adoption of the Master Plan by Stakeholders (Through Executive Council and a formal meeting of stakeholders) • Mobilisation of funding • Engagement of an Agent if that is an option agreed by the Executive Council • Rolling out the Master Plan. • THANK YOU!

More Related