1 / 25

# (Tan) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

(Tan). High-frequency pole (from the Tan averaged model (4)). Discrete-time dynamics:. Difference equation:. Z -transform:. Discrete-time ( z -domain) control-to-inductor current transfer function:. Pole at z = a Stability condition: pole inside the unit circle, | a | < 1

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

High-frequency pole(from the Tan averaged model (4))

Difference equation:

Z-transform:

Discrete-time (z-domain) control-to-inductor current transfer function:

• Pole at z = a

• Stability condition: pole inside the unit circle, |a| < 1

• Frequency response (note that z-1 corresponds to a delay of Ts in time domain):

ic + ic

-ma(t)

ic[n]

iL[n]

iL[n-1]

d[n]Ts

-m2

m1

iL(t)

iL[n]

Ts

• The response from the samples iL[n] of the inductor current to the inductor current perturbation iL(t) is a pulse of amplitude iL[n] and length Ts

• Hence, in frequency domain, the equivalent hold has the transfer function previously derived for the zero-order hold:

Control-to-inductor current small-signal response:

• CPM buck converter:

Vg = 10V, L = 5 mH, C = 75 mF, D = 0.5, V = 5 V,

I = 20 A, R = V/I = 0.25 W, fs = 100 kHz

• Inductor current slopes:

m1 = (Vg – V)/L = 1 A/ms

m2 = V/L = 1 A/ms

D = 0.5: CPM controller is stable for any compensation ramp, ma/m2 > 0

Control-to-inductor current responses for several compensation ramps (ma/m2 is a parameter)

ma/m2=0.1

ma/m2=0.5

ma/m2=1

ma/m2=5

MATLAB file: CPMfr.m

0.1

0.5

1

5

Control-to-inductor current response behaves approximately as a single-pole transfer function with a high-frequency pole at

Same prediction as HF pole in basic model (4) (Tan)

Control-to-inductor current responses for several compensation ramps (ma/m2 = 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5)

1st-order transfer-function approximation

Control-to-inductor current response behaves approximately as a second-order transfer function with corner frequency fs/2 and Q-factor given by

Control-to-inductor current responses for several compensation ramps (ma/m2 = 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5)

2nd-order transfer-function approximation

2nd-order approximation in the small-signal averaged model

DC gain of line-to-output Gvg-cpm(based on model (4))

• CPM buck converter:

Vg = 10V, L = 5 mH, C = 75 mF, D = 0.5, V = 5 V,

I = 20 A, R = V/I = 0.25 W, fs = 100 kHz

• Inductor current slopes:

m1 = (Vg – V)/L = 1 A/ms

m2 = V/L = 1 A/ms

D = 0.5: CPM controller is stable for any compensation ramp, ma/m2 > 0

Select:ma/m2 = Ma/M2 = 1, Ma = 1 A/ms

Duty-cycle control

Peak current-mode control (CPM)

Compare to first-order approximation of the high-frequency sampled-data control-to-current model

Control-to-inductor current response behaves approximately as a single-pole transfer function with a high-frequency pole at