170 likes | 252 Views
Undergraduate Admissions & Affirmative Action. Maintaining Excellence In A Changing Environment. Fall Executive Board Meeting August 19, 2003. Recent History. California: Proposition 209 (1996) Abolished all public-sector programs in education (incl. admissions, recruiting and outreach)
E N D
Undergraduate Admissions&Affirmative Action Maintaining Excellence In A Changing Environment Fall Executive Board Meeting August 19, 2003
Recent History • California: Proposition 209 (1996) • Abolished all public-sector programs in education (incl. admissions, recruiting and outreach) • Texas: Hopwood Decision (1996) • 5th Circuit ruled against UT • University of Georgia (2000) • Ruling declares consideration of race/gender violates equal protection; University suspends use in admissions • University of Michigan (1997) • Undergraduate Admissions & Law School lawsuits regarding use of race/ethnicity in admission decisions
The Decisions • Gratz v. Bollinger • Undergrad admissions admits to assigning points in process for minority students • 150 total points: 20 for race, athletes and socioeconomic status • Point system is declared unconstitutional
The Decisions • Grutter v. Bollinger • Law School asserts that its policy is necessary because of a compelling state interest in diversity • Critical Mass • Individual Review • Supreme Court supports school’s use of narrow tailoring
Michigan Response • Pleased with the outcome • Modifying applications for more info • Family educational background • Family financial background • Expensive endeavor • Hire additional readers • Longer processing time
Georgia Tech Admissions • 10 Years Ago • Current Policy • 4 Components • Holistic Review • Targeted Recruitment
Freshman Admission Criteria • High School Academic Information • Standardized Test Scores • Activities and Leadership • Personal Statement
Freshman Class 2003 PROSPECTS 88,650 APPLICANTS 8,479 ACCEPTED 5,322 EXPECTED ENROLLMENT 2,200
Admitted Class 3.79 GPA 1337 SAT As Strong As Ever
Special Recruitment Efforts • Programming • MRT • FUTURES • Targeted Contacts • Alliances • CEISMC • Women In Engineering
Women 1507 Admitted 1344 SAT 3.84 GPA Blacks 334 Admitted 1286 SAT 3.70 GPA Hispanics 237 Admitted 1349 SAT 3.75 GPA The Results Fall 2003 Freshman Pool
Women 608 Deposited 1311 SAT 3.81 GPA Blacks 126 Deposited 1262 SAT** 3.70 GPA Hispanics 71 Deposited 1298 SAT 3.70 GPA The Results Fall 2003 Freshman Profile
The Current Framework • Consideration of diversity under Powell’s concurring opinion in Bakke permits the use of race or ethnic background as a “plus” • The factor of race cannot be decisive • Each applicant must be considered as an individual • No single characteristic defines what contribution a person can make to diversity Source: Dennis Dunn, Deputy Attorney General
How Colleges are Responding • Legal Counsel Review of Policies/Practices • Preparation for Next Wave of Challenges • Study of Dissenting Opinions in Michigan Case • Seeking Creative Ways to Continue Commitment to Diversity
Next Steps for Tech • Determine What (if any) Changes Are Made • Continue to Expand Qualified Pool • Continue to Strengthen Existing Programs • Everyone Must Articulate GT’s Diversity Interests • Remain Committed to Our Diversity Goals