1 / 15

IP Transitioning in CE Routers Mark Townsley, Ole Troan

IP Transitioning in CE Routers Mark Townsley, Ole Troan. IPv6 Internet. 6rd. Native IPv6. Two Choices: Multihoming : Multiple active interfaces are allowed, router decides which WAN interface to use for upstream traffic based on IP forwarding metrics

ulema
Download Presentation

IP Transitioning in CE Routers Mark Townsley, Ole Troan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IP Transitioning in CE RoutersMark Townsley, Ole Troan

  2. IPv6 Internet 6rd Native IPv6 Two Choices: • Multihoming: Multiple active interfaces are allowed, router decides which WAN interface to use for upstream traffic based on IP forwarding metrics • Forced single-homing: Router is “allowed” one and only one active WAN interface at any time Tunneled IPv6 IPv4

  3. Parallel Dual-Stack IP Config

  4. Requirements for IPv6 Multihomingand 6rd Sunsetting • The CE router MUST associate delegated prefixes with the WAN interface(s) they were learned from (e.g., DHCPv6-PD, 6rd, etc). Each packet sent out a WAN interface MUST have a source address that corresponds to a delegated prefix associated with the given WAN interface. • The IPv6 CE router MUST allow different or identical delegated prefixes on 6rd and native interfaces. By default, a 6rd virtual interface MUST be assigned a higher routing cost than a native IPv6 interface.

  5. IPv4 Internet DS-Lite Virtual NAPT Table for Tunneled IPv4 Native IPv4 Tunneled IPv4 IPv6 Same Two Choices: • Multihoming • Forced single-homing NAPT Table for Native IPv4 ?

  6. Parallel Dual-Stack IP Config

  7. http://tplink.com/en/products/details/?categoryid=227&model=TL-R470T%2bhttp://tplink.com/en/products/details/?categoryid=227&model=TL-R470T%2b

  8. IPv4 Forwarding w/Multiple Exits (one example) ISP A WAN Intf 1 AFTR NAPT Table Dynamic: Flow 1.. Flow 2.. Flow 3.. Static: Port FWD (PCP) Address A Dynamic: Flow 1 (5-tuple) – Intf 1 Flow 2 (5-tuple) – Intf 1 Flow 3 (5-tuple) – Intf 2 Flow 4 (5-tuple) – Intf 2 Flow 5 (5-tuple) – Intf 1 Flow 6 (5-tuple) – Intf 1 Flow 7 (5-tuple) – Intf 2 Flow 8 (5-tuple) – Intf 2 Flow 9 (5-tuple) – Intf 1 : Flow n (5-tuple) Static: DS-Lite – Intf 3 Port FWD (UPnP, PCP…) CPE NAPT Table ISP B WAN Int 2 Address B WAN Int 3 DS-Lite No Address Address C…Z

  9. Example IPv4 Forwarding Policy for Transition 1. IPv4 over IPv6 transport is preferred over others • Less address translation occurrences is preferred over more[RFC5864][I-D.donley-nat444-impacts] • The closer the state is to the edge, the better. [RFC1958]

  10. Forcing Single-Homing

  11. Forced Singlehoming(2)

  12. Forced Singlehoming(3)

  13. IPv4 IPv6 CPE ite 6rd

  14. ISP IPv4 IPv4 ISP IPv6 IPv6 CPE ISP ite ite 6rd 6rd

  15. What for 6204-bis? Current text states CE Routers SHOULD implement DS-Lite and 6rd, but avoids how they interact with one another as well as with Native IPv4 and Native IPv6. Two choices: 1. Specify in the “Transition” section that IP interface configuration operate independently In order to support Multihoming: • For 6rd: Include the two requirements in this presentation • For DS-Lite: Require that IPv4 “dual-wan” functionality be employed. If we want to transition to IPv6, define a default policy for IPv4 mechanisms. 2. Or, move the “Transitioning” solution space to a new document.

More Related