wrtg 391 week 6 discussions latest umuc visit n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
WRTG 391 WEEK 6 DISCUSSIONS LATEST-UMUC PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
WRTG 391 WEEK 6 DISCUSSIONS LATEST-UMUC

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 3

WRTG 391 WEEK 6 DISCUSSIONS LATEST-UMUC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 0 Views
  • Uploaded on

\n VISIT BELOW LINK, TO DOWNLOAD THIS COURSE:\n\nHTTPS://WWW.TUTORIALSSERVICE.NET/PRODUCT/WRTG-391-WEEK-6-DISCUSSIONS-LATEST-UMUC/\n\nOr \nEmail us on\nSUPPORT@TUTORIALSSERVICE.NET\n\nWRTG 391 Week 6 Discussions Latest-UMUC\nWRTG391\nWRTG 391 Week 6 Discussions Latest-UMUC\nDQ 1\nSynthesizing Sources — Four Movie Reviews of “Steve Jobs”\nAfter you complete your post due this Friday, April 21 by midnight, please be sure to post to one classmate of your choosing (preferably who has not received a response) and provide feedback explaining what is noteworthy about their post and why in a sentence regarding the classmate’s synthesis process overall.\n

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'WRTG 391 WEEK 6 DISCUSSIONS LATEST-UMUC' - tutorialsservicesnet


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
wrtg 391 week 6 discussions latest umuc visit

WRTG 391 WEEK 6 DISCUSSIONS LATEST-UMUC

VISIT BELOW LINK, TO DOWNLOAD THIS COURSE:

HTTPS://WWW.TUTORIALSSERVICE.NET/PRODUCT/WRTG-391-WEEK-6-DISCUSSIONS-

LATEST-UMUC/

Or

Email us on

SUPPORT@TUTORIALSSERVICE.NET

WRTG 391 Week 6 Discussions Latest-UMUC

WRTG391

WRTG 391 Week 6 Discussions Latest-UMUC

DQ 1

Synthesizing Sources —Four Movie Reviews of “Steve Jobs”

After you complete your post due this Friday, April 21 by midnight, please be sure to post to one

classmate of your choosing (preferably who has not received a response) and provide feedback

explaining what is noteworthy about their post and why in a sentence regarding the classmate’s synthesis

process overall.

This week, you are reading four movie reviews of the movie Steve Jobs. The reviews are from Ann

Hornaday, Rex Reed, Benjamin Lee, and Anthony Lane.

After perusing the four movie reviews, please complete the following tasks:

The four reviewers do not agree on their evaluation of the acting in the film.

1. First, analyze all four reviewers and, for each reviewer, write at least one summary sentence

describing what the review says about the acting in the film. In addition, for each reviewer, quote

the reviewer at least one time to demonstrate the sentiment he or she expresses about the

acting.

Ann Hornaday-

summary statement

Summary statement:

Quote from this reviewer to support the summary statement:

Rex Reed-

Summary statement:

Quote from this reviewer to support the summary statement:

Benjamin Lee-

Summary statement:

Quote from this reviewer to support the summary statement:

Anthony Lane –

Summary statement:

Quote from this reviewer to support the summary statement:

2. Then, write three or four short paragraphs that synthesize all four reviewers and the points they

make on the acting in the film. Remember, when synthesizing, you don’t simply list what each

author says about the topic. You write about the issue of acting in the film and integrate the points

of all four reviewers into that analysis.

You could group authors into categories, if possible. For example, consider the reviewers that tend to

praise the acting and write about them in a paragraph or two. Then consider the reviewers that did not

like the acting and write about them in a paragraph or two. Following this analysis, you might write a

concluding paragraph that summarizes all four reviewers’ views on the acting.

DQ 2

Analyzing a Literature Review, Part I

This discussion thread is designed to help you see how a synthesis of sources essay, or literature review,

is organized.

Please download the article, “Beyond Frequency: Perceived Realism and the CSI Effect,” by Evelyn

Maeder and Richard Corbett. The article is available in the e-reserves of your class.

On pages 84-85, the authors provide an introduction to the research study they conducted. You can read

this section if you would like to. However, for this discussion thread, please read from page 85 “(“The CSI

effect defined”) to page 94 (up to the section entitled “Method”).

then answer the following questions

Then answer the following questions:

1. In the first section (“The CSI effect defined”), do the authors ever give you their opinion on the

CSI effect? How do they support their definition and their expansion on the definition? How many

different sources do they cite in this section?

2. From pages 86-88, the authors discuss lawyers, police officers, judges, and community

members. In this section, do the authors ever give you their opinion on any of the issues

discussed?

3. Examine the section entitled “Verdicts” (pp. 90-92). How do the results from the study by Shelton

et al. differ from the results of the study by Kim, Barak, and Shelton? How do the results of the

study by Baskin and Sommers differ from the results of other studies?

4. As a result of having read this article, please write a few sentences about what you might have

learned about a) synthesizing sources or b) the CSI effect.

Download Now