bsop 434 week 5 lab cycle counting and logistics n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
BSOP 434 WEEK 5 LAB CYCLE COUNTING AND LOGISTICS SYSTEMS PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
BSOP 434 WEEK 5 LAB CYCLE COUNTING AND LOGISTICS SYSTEMS

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 4

BSOP 434 WEEK 5 LAB CYCLE COUNTING AND LOGISTICS SYSTEMS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 2 Views
  • Uploaded on

\nVisit Below Link, To Download This Course:\n\nhttps://www.tutorialsservice.net/product/bsop-434-week-5-lab-cycle-counting-logistics-systems/\n\nOr \nEmail us on\nSUPPORT@TUTORIALSSERVICE.NET\n\nBSOP 434 WEEK 5 LAB CYCLE COUNTING AND LOGISTICS SYSTEMS\nWeek 5: Cycle Counting and Logistics Systems – Lab\nPrint This Page\nLab 5: Columbia Lumber Products Company\nSee “Due Dates for Assignments & Exams” in the Syllabus for due dates.\nSubmit your assignment to the Dropbox located on the silver tab at the top of this page.\nScenario/Summary\nThe Columbia Lumber Products Company (CLPC) was headquartered in Portland, Oregon, where it had been founded in 1899. For many years, its principal product had been only lumber; in the 1940s it began producing plywood, and in 1960, particle board. The first two products, lumber and plywood, were produced at various sites in Oregon, and marketed on the West Coast and as far east as Chicago.\nParticle board was produced in Duluth, Minnesota, at a plant built in 1962 with a U.S. Area Redevelopment Administration Loan. Initially, the input to the plant was trimmings and other scrap from CLPC’s Oregon operations. Particle board sales increased so quickly that the Duluth operation consumed not only all of the former waste from CLPC’s Oregon plant but also waste purchased from various lumber and wood products operations in Minnesota and northern Wisconsin.\n

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'BSOP 434 WEEK 5 LAB CYCLE COUNTING AND LOGISTICS SYSTEMS' - tutorialsservicesnet


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
bsop 434 week 5 lab cycle counting and logistics

BSOP 434 WEEK 5 LAB CYCLE COUNTING AND

LOGISTICS SYSTEMS

Visit Below Link, To Download This Course:

https://www.tutorialsservice.net/product/bsop-434-week-5-lab-cycle-counting-logistics-systems/

Or

Email us on

SUPPORT@TUTORIALSSERVICE.NET

BSOP 434 WEEK 5 LAB CYCLE COUNTING AND LOGISTICS SYSTEMS

Week 5: Cycle Counting and Logistics Systems – Lab

Print This Page

Lab 5: Columbia Lumber Products Company

See “Due Dates for Assignments & Exams” in the Syllabus for due dates.

Submit your assignment to the Dropbox located on the silver tab at the top of this page.

Scenario/Summary

The Columbia Lumber Products Company (CLPC) was headquartered in Portland, Oregon, where it had

been founded in 1899. For many years, its principal product had been only lumber; in the 1940s it began

producing plywood, and in 1960, particle board. The first two products, lumber and plywood, were

produced at various sites in Oregon, and marketed on the West Coast and as far east as Chicago.

Particle board was produced in Duluth, Minnesota, at a plant built in 1962 with a U.S. Area

Redevelopment Administration Loan. Initially, the input to the plant was trimmings and other scrap from

CLPC’s Oregon operations. Particle board sales increased so quickly that the Duluth operation consumed

not only all of the former waste from CLPC’s Oregon plant but also waste purchased from various lumber

and wood products operations in Minnesota and northern Wisconsin.

In terms of product volume, CLPC’s sales doubled between 1960 and 1990. However, nearly all the

growth had been in particle board; lumber and plywood sales remained relatively constant (though

varying with changes in the home construction industry). In 1996, exports accounted for 9% of CLPC’s

sales nearly all of this was plywood sold

sales. Nearly all of this was plywood sold to Japan. Fifteen percent of CLPC’s 1996 purchases were from

foreign sources, 5% was mahogany from the Philippines used for plywood veneer, and 10% was wood

scrap purchased from Ontario, Canada, for use in CLPC’s Duluth plant. Particle board produced in Duluth

was marketed in all states east of the Rocky Mountains, although sales in the southern United States

were somewhat less than spectacular.

The slowdown in home production, which started in the late 1970s in the Midwest, really never ended and

resulted in many years of little or no growth in CLPC’s sales. Common stock dividends had been cut

several times. In 1996, they were 37 cents per share, down considerably from their peak—in 1976—of

$2.21.

Stockholders, the outside directors, and various lending institutions were becoming increasingly unhappy.

After a long, tense board of directors meeting, agreement was reached only with respect to what some of

the organizational problems were. A partial list follows.

The corporate headquarters was in Portland, although all growth occurred in the Midwest. Possibly, the

headquarters, or at least more functions, should be shifted to an office in Duluth where the plant was, or

to Chicago, the largest sales office. A major relocation away from Portland would be difficult. Many

employees would choose to remain on the West Coast. Even for those willing to relocate, there was a

split between those willing to relocate to Duluth and those willing to relocate to Chicago.

There were too many vice presidents (see Exhibit 14-A). Because four vice presidents (engineering,

finance, human resources, and purchasing) would reach mandatory retirement age by 1997, the number

of vice presidents should be reduced from nine to no more than six (plus one executive vice president).

Logistics and distribution costs were higher than industry averages. The majority of customer complaints

dealt with poor deliveries. In Exhibit 14-A, a T shows where a traffic management function was located.

Geographically, the traffic manager for overseas operations was located in Seattle, which was a foreign

trade center for the Pacific Northwest. The Chicago sales office had a traffic manager who handled all

fiberboard distribution and lumber and plywood distribution east of the Rockies. Production and

purchasing shared a traffic manager who was headquartered in Portland and whose principal duty was

overseeing shipments of waste products from Oregon to Minnesota. Another traffic manager in Portland,

who reported to the sales vice president, was acknowledged to be the firm’s senior traffic manager and

more or less coordinated the efforts of the other three. Recently, Irwin Buchanan III had been promoted to

that post. He was the only one authorized to initiate action before regulatory bodies, and he also handled

the negotiations with carrier rate-making bodies and with carriers. (CLPC used contract truckers and rail

for most of its shipping.)

the purchasing department handled the details

The purchasing department handled the details of fleet management, which included about a hundred

autos on long-term lease for use by management and by the sales force. Several light trucks were leased

for use around the plants.

CLPC also owned two small aircraft, which often were the target of questions during stockholders’

meetings. One plane was based at Portland, the other at Duluth. Each was used in its respective region

for trips to sites without scheduled airline service. Both planes were under control of the production

department. Other departments, especially sales, complained that the planes were being used for the

benefit of the production department rather than for the benefit of the entire firm.

P in the exhibit shows two packaging engineering functions. The one under engineering was located in

Portland and dealt with plywood products. The one under sales was located in Chicago and handled

particle board products. The two packaging engineering functions saw their roles differently. The one in

Portland was concerned mainly with safe packing and packaging of products moving between CLPC

plants or from CLPC plants to customers. The Chicago packaging engineers were interested in finding

new markets for particle board and lumber as packaging materials to be sold to others. W in the exhibit

shows where there are company-owned warehouses. Numerous public warehouses were also used,

although not continually. Block I (upper left corner) in the chart below shows locations of individuals

concerned with inventory levels. All four individuals were located in Portland. F indicates where sales

forecasting took place. Only sales and production devoted much staff to forecasting. Each quarter,

however, the financial vice president’s office coordinated all forecasts to ensure comparability. Computer

operations were under control of the engineering division. CLPC’s executive vice president determined

priorities for computer access and use.

The human resources department handled employee moves, although only a few had taken place since

1980. An outside director who was familiar with current federal legislation suggested that CLPC negotiate

a contract with a household goods carrier to handle all CLPC employee moves. This action would be

especially significant if a major reorganization resulted in numerous employee transfers.

SEE LAB DISCUSSION THREAD FOR A COPY OF THE Exhibit 14-A

Deliverables

This week’s lab consists of five questions. Please be certain you answer all the questions and address all

the areas outlined in the grading below.

L A B S T E P S

Step 1: Original Organizational Chart

question 1 draw a new organization chart

Question 1: Draw a new organization chart for Columbia Lumber Products Company that you feel best

overcomes the directors’ criticisms of CLPC’s present (January 31, 1996) organization. Indicate the

geographic location of all operations shown on the new chart. Explain why you established the

organization chart the way you did.

Step 2: Organizational Chart of Reorganized Firm

Question 2: Assume that the firm should be reorganized in a manner that emphasizes sales and

marketing. This would include a physical distribution system, which would support the marketing effort.

Draw an organization chart that you think would accomplish this aim. Indicate the geographic location of

all operations on the new chart and explain why you drew the chart as you did.

Step 3: Organizational Chart of Centralize Firm

Question 3: Assume that the firm wants to reorganize into a highly centralized form, closely managed

from a single home office. Draw a new chart that takes this into account. Indicate the geographic location

of all operations on the chart and explain why you organized it as you did.

Step 4: Organizational Chart of Decentralize Firm

Question 4: Assume, instead, that the firm wants to reorganize into a highly decentralized form, where

many important decisions can be made out in the field. Draw up a new chart, including the geographic

location of all activities. Explain why you drew it up as you did.

Step 5: Faster Third-party Firm

Question 5: Young Irwin Buchanan III, the firm’s senior traffic manager, heard rumors that the number of

vice presidents was to be reduced. He felt that this would reduce his chances of ever achieving vice

presidential—or presidential—status. Luckily, he had access to some money in a family trust fund. He

wondered whether he should propose to form a separate, third-party firm to contract with CLPC to

perform CLPC’s logistical operations. What functions should it offer to perform?

Step 6: Final Step

Submit your completed assignment to the Lab Dropbox in a MS Word document for grading

Download Now