1 / 11

Key Higher Education Issues in the New Congress

Key Higher Education Issues in the New Congress. A University of Vermont Legal Issues in Higher Education Webinar January 23, 2013 Ken Salomon Chairman, Dow Lohnes Government Strategies. Structure. Split congressional higher education jurisdiction: House and Senate/numerous committees

trevet
Download Presentation

Key Higher Education Issues in the New Congress

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Key Higher Education Issues in the New Congress A University of Vermont Legal Issues in Higher Education Webinar January 23, 2013 Ken Salomon Chairman, Dow Lohnes Government Strategies

  2. Structure • Split congressional higher education jurisdiction: House and Senate/numerous committees • Authorization and Oversight of Higher Education Act and student aid programs • Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee • House Education and the Workforce Committee • Actual funding • House and Senate Appropriations Committees • Judiciary, Science, and Commerce Committees among others with some jurisdiction • Lots of venues/lots of players • Today’s discussion only the Education Committees 2

  3. Some New PlayersSenate HELP Committee 3

  4. Some New PlayersHouse Education & Workforce Committee 4

  5. Primary Concern: The Budget • Budget, deficit and revenue issues are driving Congress • Budgetary process dysfunctional • Congress no longer budgets and appropriates federal funds through its normal process • “Stopgap” appropriations have become the norm, each of which provides an opportunity for discretionary program cuts • Meanwhile, Pell Grant program costs have exploded • In-school subsidies, year-round Pell, and other eligibility changes have squeezed Title IV funds • What’s next? • It could be removing the housing allowance for distance education students, which could be a Trojan Horse to remove the housing allowance for all Pell Grants 5

  6. Too Much Work, Too Little Time The House and Senate authorizing committees have an enormous laundry list of education legislation overdue or coming due: • The Elementary and Secondary Education Act • The Workforce Investment Act • The Higher Education Act • Plus • Pell Grant funding levels and student loan interest rates • Near term issue for Senate HELP, however, likely to be mental health issues related to school safety in the President’s gun violence initiative 6

  7. The Path to HEA Reauthorization • Two major issues Congress will focus on during HEA reauthorization • Cost of attendance • Role of accreditation in higher education • We hear lots of angst, particularly Sen. Harkin (D-IA), but no solid reform proposals • Other issues • Modification and interpretation of Title IV financial aid rules that could potentially harm eLearning students (e.g., Last Day of Attendance, state authorization) • Data and outcomes will be front-and-center, and it is essential that such use of data is not unfairly construed against eLearning students • The role of technology and innovation broadly, from the proposed ARPA-ED to the fruits of the Department’s Investing in Innovation grants from the Recovery Act 7

  8. A Focus on e-Learning • Start with the fact of congressional/DoE skeptics • Conflation of e-Learning with private sector schools • Explosive growth lead to concerns • Quality, integrity, cost of attendance, value, outcomes • What’s a MOOC? 8

  9. Previous Reauthorizations • The action on eLearning since 1992 • 1992 Reauthorization: Title IV funds allowed for distance learning for the first time • 1998 Reauthorization: Distance Education Demonstration Program • 2006 HEA Extension: Removal of the 50% Rule • 2008 Reauthorization: Mostly technical changes, but some on the margins, such as the definition of “distance education,” that have led to both DoE regulatory and enforcement roadblocks for institutions • No organized e-Learning representation in ’92,’98’ 06, or ’08 9

  10. This Time Could be Different • State authorization rule galvanized the community into action • Traditional sector belatedly realized that private sector funded schools not only ones affected • Scramble for relief/response • Various groups formed to develop ways to address state authorization • President’s Forum • APLU/SHEEO • Congressional E-Learning Caucus formed • Reps. Noem (R-SD) and Polis (D-CO) • Potential to be a significant advocate in reauthorization • It is time for a coordinated voice to advocate for e-Learning 10

  11. Key Higher Education Issues in the New Congress A University of Vermont Legal Issues in Higher Education Webinar January 23, 2013 Ken Salomon Dow Lohnes Government Strategies Washington, d.c. 202.776.2566 kSalomon@dowlohnesgov.com

More Related