elizabeth a krupinski phd arizona telemedicine program n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Elizabeth A. Krupinski, PhD Arizona Telemedicine Program PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Elizabeth A. Krupinski, PhD Arizona Telemedicine Program

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 57

Elizabeth A. Krupinski, PhD Arizona Telemedicine Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 127 Views
  • Uploaded on

Elizabeth A. Krupinski, PhD Arizona Telemedicine Program. Ovitt, et al . Intravenous angiography using digital video subtraction: x-ray imaging system. AJR 135(6):1141-4, 1980.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

Elizabeth A. Krupinski, PhD Arizona Telemedicine Program


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Presentation Transcript
    1. Elizabeth A. Krupinski, PhD Arizona Telemedicine Program

    2. Ovitt, et al.Intravenous angiography using digital video subtraction: x-ray imaging system.AJR 135(6):1141-4, 1980. An x-ray imaging system, using digital subtraction techniques, has been developed. The system requires: (1) high output generation equipment; (2) an image intensifier capable of receiving high output exposures, 1 mR (2.58 X 10(-7) C/kg) at the face of the intensifier, without loss of either contrast or resolution; (3) a precision digital video camera; (4) processing computer with sufficient storage capacity; and (5) digital image storage. With this system it is possible to visualize the major arteries after intravenous contrast injection.

    3. Capp et al. The digital radiology department of the future. Rad Clin N Am 23(2):349-55, 1985. The boom in microelectronics, including cost-effectiveness, has now allowed us to consider the use of these objects to store digital images. There remains much research, development, And clinical evaluation to be done in receptor technology. Further improvements in image processing, optical laser disk storage, & optical transmission and further commercial Development of display technology must take place. All of These developments are occurring simultaneously. Within 5 to 10 years, radiology departments will most likely be totally electronic, probably cost-effective, and, it is hoped, more diagnostically accurate.

    4. Oldest established TM application • Well integrated in numerous settings • Facilitated by co-evolution PACS • Few to no reimbursement issues • Only interventional radiology currently less amenable to teleradiology applications • Little/no differences between teleradiology & on-site radiology

    5. ACR-NEMA development DICOM • Continual updates of DICOM • Development of standards & practice guidelines that explicitly include teleradiology • http://medical.nema.org/ • http://deckard.duhs.duke.edu/~samei/tg18.htm

    6. Standards & Guidelines

    7. Standards & Guidelines

    8. Standards & Guidelines

    9. Key is the human-computer interface • Series of observer performance studies designed to optimize the digital reading room environment • Performance metrics • Diagnostic accuracy (ROC) • Search efficiency (eye position) • Human Visual System Modeling

    10. Softcopy display parameters • Luminance • Calibration (tone scale) • Type of phosphor • CRT vs LCD • MTF • Viewing angle • Number of displays • Ambient lighting • Compression • Role of color P45 P104

    11. Spatial & contrast resolution limitations require radiologists to search images. The UVF is about 2.5 deg radius. Probability of target detection falls off as a function of target eccentricity from axis of gaze.

    12. Total viewing time shorter • Time to first hit shorter • Total time on lesion shorter • Fewer returns to lesion • Total path length shorter • Overall = more EFFICIENT

    13. Task

    14. Experience

    15. Med Student Resident Pathologist

    16. Display & Interface 20% fixations fell outside diagnostic image

    17. Hospital/MC • Clinics • Mobile van • Mammo • Dedicated • PET clinic • THH • UASA • Public Health • Battlefield • Hand-held

    18. Medical Imaging Consultants -> ? • Data acquisition & archiving • RadWorks (GE) -> Siemens/Fuji • Viewing station • 35% of department’s reading volume • 25% department’s income • Reading only & reading + archiving • $/case & $/set volume

    19. 68% sites using AHSC hub for TM services use TR service • TR typically 1st service requested • 79% of sites with TR use only TR • 21% started with TR & added services • TR specialty with most volume

    20. Time from mammography to consult with oncologist ~ 28 days • Screening mammography • Diagnostic mammography • Biopsy • Pathology processing & report • Oncology consultation • THIS IS TOO LONG!

    21. Even Worse in Rural

    22. DS3 (45 Mbps) backbone • ATM protocol • T1 (1.5 Mbps) links • 65 direct link sites • ~ 85 with affiliated • NARBHA • DOC • IHS • RT & SF applications • ~ 55 sub-specialties • Teleradiology core app.

    23. Started in 2001 to rural sites • 7/28 telerad sites send mammo • Mostly use GE system • Directly to TBC for reading • Some archive some do not • Contracts specify 30-45 min TAT • > 26,000 telemammography

    24. UltraClinic Model

    25. Quick Processing Milestone Medical Systems RHS-1-30 Vacuum Histoprocessor

    26. Telepathology DMetrixTM -40 Slide Scanner System

    27. Telepathology report sent S&F to oncologist • Oncologist connects RT videoconference to rural location • Discuss pathology results • If necessary discuss treatment options and plan of action

    28. The Future of TR & PACS • MI = prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment & therapy • Acquisition & display technology continually changes • Clinician shortages are not easing • Rapidly expanding types & number images • Multi-modality & fusion complimentary information sources is becoming common • Anatomy & function gross & molecular levels • Merging specialties

    29. (Quon et al. J ClinOncol; 2005; 23:1664-1673)

    30. Clarke et al. Validation if Tumor Burden Measurements Using 3D Histopathology. In: Digital Mammography 2008. Springer-Verlag.

    31. The Future of TR & PACS • Image Display, Analysis & Processing are key links in the imaging chain • Need to present data to the clinician in the most efficient & informative manner • Taking into account perceptual & cognitive capabilities of human observer • Ultimate goal = facilitate decision-making process & enhance patient care • Related goal = improve workflow & the reading environment

    32. Stereo vs Traditional • Az 0.85 to 0.94 • 23% increase TPs • 105% increase calcs • 46% decrease FPs Getty et al. Stereoscopic Digital Mammography: Improved Accuracy of Lesion Detection in Breast Cancer Screening. In: Digital Mammography 2008. Springer-Verlag.

    33. 50 DR chest images (PA) : 1/2 solitary pulmonary nodule verified CT; 1/2 nodule free • 6 radiologists (3 sr residents, 3 board-certified) • 3MP Barco color medical-grade display (BarcoCoronis MDCC-3120-DL) vs COTS color 2MP monitor (Dell 2405) • Calibrated (DICOM GSDF ) to luminance corresponding to backlight aging 1-year time • Max Barco 500 cd/m2 min 0.77 cd/m2 • Max Dell COTS 342 cd/m2 min 0.376 cd/m2

    34. Color vs Color F = 4.1496, p = 0.0471 Sensitivity = 0.91 vs 0.86 Specificity = 0.93 vs 0.92

    35. Color vs Color F = 3.38, p = 0.067

    36. Color vs Color No significant differences TN significantly different