1 / 9

Consideration on standardization process

Consideration on standardization process. Authors:. Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [C onsideration on standardization process ] Date Submitted: [January 21, 2014]

toya
Download Presentation

Consideration on standardization process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Consideration on standardization process Authors: Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric Industries

  2. Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title:[Consideration on standardization process] Date Submitted: [January 21, 2014] Source:[Takashi Yamamoto] Company [Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd] Address [1-1-3, Shimaya, Konohana-ku, Osaka, 554-0024 Japan] Voice:[+81-06-6466-5695], FAX: [+81-06-6462-4586], E-Mail:[yamamoto-takashi@sei.co.jp] Re:[Call for contributions by IEEE802.15 SG-SRU] Abstract:[This presentation provides our view on the SG and TG standardization process.] Purpose:[To support the drafting of PAR & 5C.] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric Industries

  3. Abstract • An evaluation methodology for SRU should be substantially discussed in order to assess gains relative to legacy IEEE802.15.4 systems. • This presentation provides our view on the SG and TG standardization process that could help RRMM spec development. Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric Industries

  4. Step 1: Clarify the RRMM requirements • Collect the requirements of the RRMM use cases and narrow down the target of SRU. • Applications • Example: position estimation, periodic monitoring, etc. • Traffic models of sensors and actuators • packet size, interval, event probability • Deployment methods • numbers of gateways and devices • additional deployment is possible or not • initial channel settings • etc. Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric Industries

  5. Example of classifiers Details of the classifiers arefor further discussion. Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric Industries

  6. Step 2: Establish evaluation methodology • Define metrics to evaluate communication quality in the view point of application users. • Prioritize the evaluation items (throughput, delay, power consumption, etc.) for each application. • The problem is how to describe user experience such as connectivity, discovery, reachability, and mobility technically. Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric Industries

  7. Step 3: Evaluate new RRMM technologies • Analyze the issues of the legacy IEEE802.15.4 RRMM technologies and collect the solutions. • Simulation is one of potential evaluation methods. • IEEE802.15 MAC/PHY may be abstracted boldly to use the existing network simulation software. • Summarize how to approach the issues in the SRU standardization activity. Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric Industries

  8. Schedule • The evaluation activity need enough discussion time, but we can’t repeat Step1~3 several times. Therefore, we propose that we schedule this work clearly and advance it systematically. • Guidelines for Step1~3 proposals will be roughly determined in order to collect contributions widely. Step 2: Evaluation Methodology Step 3: Proposal of new technologies Step 1: Requirements Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric Industries

  9. Summary • We proposed the standardization process of SRU. • Step 1: Clarify the RRMM requirements • Step 2: Establish evaluation methodology • Step 3: Evaluate new RRMM technologies • Our intention is not to limit the discussion, but to activate the discussion by clarifying the issues at each step. Takashi Yamamoto, Sumitomo Electric Industries

More Related