160 likes | 265 Views
Explore the evidence, policy shifts, and Supreme Court rulings on school vouchers and No Child Left Behind mandates. Learn how thoughtful choice implementation can enhance public education.
E N D
WHY TAKE A FRESH LOOK AT CHOICE? • There is a great deal of new evidence • Law and policy are newly open to choice • Supreme Court ruling on vouchers • No Child Left Behind mandates • Choice is here, like it or not • Communities face crossroads: Thoughtful or random development of choice
THE NATIONAL WORKING COMMISSION ON CHOICE IN K-12 EDUCATION • Paul T. Hill, University of Washington • Julian Betts, University of San Diego • David Ferrero, Gates Foundation • Brian P. Gill, RAND • Dan Goldhaber, University of Washington • Laura Hamilton, RAND • Jeffrey R. Henig, Columbia University • Frederick M. Hess, American Enterprise Institute • Tom Loveless, Brookings • Stephen Macedo, Princeton University • Lawrence Rosenstock, High Tech High • Charles Venegoni, John Hersey High School • Janet Weiss, University of Michigan • Patrick J. Wolf, Georgetown University
CHOICE IS ANY ARRANGEMENT THAT LETS PARENTS PICK AMONG PUBLICLY FUNDED SCHOOLS • There are many forms of public choice depending on: • Who may choose among schools • Who may provide schools • Under what rules
THE COMMISSION’S BOTTOM LINES • Research supports neither the greatest fears nor the greatest hopes • Choice is complex; can be implemented well with thoughtful design and investment • Choice can enhance public education in communities that will design and implement it thoughtfully
HOW THE COMMISSION DID ITS WORK • Focused on greatest hopes and fears about choice • Analyzed what is known now • Identified design and investment factors that affect key outcomes
THE COMMISSION FOCUSED ON AMERICANS’ MAIN HOPES AND FEARS ABOUT CHOICE • Supporters’ Hopes • Improved student learning • Good new schools • Improved public schools • Opponents’ Fears • Greater segregation • Children in public schools worse off • Civic disunity
CHOICE IS NOT HARD WIRED TO ANY OUTCOME NOT: CHOICE OUTCOMES BUT: CIRCUMSTANCES CHOICE BEHAVIOR OUTCOMES RULES
COMMUNITIES CONTROL MANY FACTORS THAT LINK CHOICE TO OUTCOMES OUTCOMES FACTORS
POSITIVE CIVIC ATTITUDES COME VIA EFFECTIVE SCHOOLS • Design features that promote student learning and avoid segregation also promote civic cohesion • Communities might also: • Require teaching of core civics classes • Give incentives for schools to admit high-cost students • Prevent separatist or hate-based teaching
COMMUNITIES FACE TRADEOFFS ON REGULATION AND FUNDING HIGH FUNDING “PAYOFF” ZONE FOR CHOICE HEAVY REGULATION LIGHT REGULATION LOW FUNDING
FOUNDATIONS CAN MAKE MAJOR CONTRIBUTIONS • Funding parent information and outreach • Paying for design of fair admissions systems • Investing in development of new schools • Identifying and training leaders for schools of choice • Helping localities share lessons about choice implementation
CHOICE OUTCOMES DEPEND ON CIRCUMSTANCES, INVESTMENT, DESIGN • Many key factors are knowable, controllable • Making good policies and developing capacities is challenging • States, feds, and foundations can help communities that want to enhance public education via choice
WHAT’S NEXT: A NATIONAL INITIATIVE ON DOING CHOICE RIGHT • Research, development, and outreach aimed to help localities on: • Design of choice programs • Investment in new capacities • Disciplined implementation and learning from experience