1 / 42

SJTU CMGPD 2012 Methodological Lecture Day 4

SJTU CMGPD 2012 Methodological Lecture Day 4. Household and Relationship Variables. Outline. Existing household variables Identifiers Characteristics Dynamics Household relationship Creation of new variables Use of bysort / egen Household relationship variables. Identifiers.

tomas
Download Presentation

SJTU CMGPD 2012 Methodological Lecture Day 4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SJTU CMGPD 2012Methodological LectureDay 4 Household and Relationship Variables

  2. Outline • Existing household variables • Identifiers • Characteristics • Dynamics • Household relationship • Creation of new variables • Use of bysort/egen • Household relationship variables

  3. Identifiers • HOUSEHOLD_ID • Identifies records associated with a household in the current register • HOUSEHOLD_SEQ • The order of the current household (linghu) within the current household group (yihu) • UNIQUE_HH_ID • Identifies records associated with the same household across different registers • New value assigned at time of household division • Each of the resulting households gets a new, different

  4. Characteristics • HH_SIZE • Number of living members of the household • Set to missing before 1789 • HH_DIVIDE_NEXT • Number of households in the next register that the members of the current household are associated with. • 1 if no division • 0 if extinction • 2 or more if division • Set to missing before 1789

  5. histogram HH_SIZE if PRESENT & HH_SIZE > 0, width(2) scheme(s1mono) fraction ytitle("Proportion of individuals") xtitle("Number of members")

  6. This isn’t particularly appealing • A log scale on the x axis would help • In STATA, histogram forces fixed width bins, even when the x scale is set to log • We can collapse the data and plot using twoway bar or scatter table HH_SIZE, replace twoway bar table1 HH_SIZE if HH_SIZE > 0, xscale(log) scheme(s1mono) xlabel(0 1 2 5 10 20 50 100 150)

  7. What if we would like to convert to fractions? • Compute total number of households by summing table1, then divide each value of table 1 by the total • sum(table1) returns the sum of table 1 up to the current observation • total[_N] returns the value of total in the last observation drop if HH_SIZE <= 0 generate total = sum(table1) generate hh_fraction = table1/total[_N] twoway bar hh_fraction HH_SIZE if HH_SIZE > 0, xscale(log) scheme(s1mono) xlabel(0 1 2 5 10 20 50 100 150) ytitle("Proportion of households")

  8. Households as units of analysis • The previous figures all treated individuals as the units of an analysis • Every household was represented as many times as it had members • A household with 100 members would contribute 100 observations • In effect, the figures represent household size as experienced by individuals • Sometimes we would like to treat households as units of analysis • So that each household only contributes one observation per register

  9. Households as units of analysis • One easy way is to create a flag variable that is set to 1 only for the first observation in each household • Then select based on that flag variable for tabulations etc. • This leaves the original individual level data intact bysort HOUSEHOLD_ID: generate hh_first_record = _n == 1 histogram HH_SIZE if hh_first_record & HH_SIZE > 0, width(2) scheme(s1mono) fraction ytitle("Proportion of households") xtitle("Number of members")

  10. Another approach to plotting trends • We can plot average household size by year of birth without ‘destroying’ the data with TABLE, REPLACE or COLLAPSE bysort YEAR: egenmean_hh_size = mean(HH_SIZE) if HH_SIZE > 0 bysort YEAR: egenfirst_in_year = _n == 1 twoway scatter mean_hh_size YEAR if first_in_year & YEAR >= 1775, scheme(s1mono) ytitle("Mean household size of individuals") xlabel(1775(25)1900)

  11. Mean household size of individuals by age keep if AGE_IN_SUI > 0 & SEX == 2 & YEAR >= 1789 & HH_SIZE > 0 bysort AGE_IN_SUI: egenmean_hh_size = mean(HH_SIZE) bysort AGE_IN_SUI: generate first_in_age = _n == 1 twoway scatter mean_hh_size AGE_IN_SUI if first_in_age & AGE_IN_SUI <= 80, scheme(s1mono) ytitle("Mean household size of individuals") xlabel(1(5)85) xtitle("Age in sui") lowessmean_hh_size AGE_IN_SUI if first_in_age & AGE_IN_SUI <= 80, scheme(s1mono) ytitle("Mean household size of individuals") xlabel(1(5)85) xtitle("Age in sui") msize(small)

  12. Household divisionIndividuals by next register . tab HH_DIVIDE_NEXT if PRESENT & NEXT_3 & HH_DIVIDE_NEXT >= 0 Number of | household in | the next | available | register | Freq. Percent Cum. ---------------+----------------------------------- 1 | 789,250 94.98 94.98 2 | 33,000 3.97 98.95 3 | 5,815 0.70 99.65 4 | 1,812 0.22 99.87 5 | 383 0.05 99.91 6 | 314 0.04 99.95 7 | 196 0.02 99.98 8 | 34 0.00 99.98 9 | 82 0.01 99.99 10 | 86 0.01 100.00 ---------------+----------------------------------- Total | 830,972 100.00

  13. Household divisionHouseholds by next register . bysort HOUSEHOLD_ID: generate first_in_hh = _n == 1 . tab HH_DIVIDE_NEXT if PRESENT & NEXT_3 & HH_DIVIDE_NEXT >= 0 & first_in_hh Number of | household in | the next | available | register | Freq. Percent Cum. ---------------+----------------------------------- 1 | 117,317 97.80 97.80 2 | 2,287 1.91 99.71 3 | 272 0.23 99.94 4 | 57 0.05 99.98 5 | 8 0.01 99.99 6 | 7 0.01 100.00 7 | 2 0.00 100.00 9 | 1 0.00 100.00 10 | 1 0.00 100.00 ---------------+----------------------------------- Total | 119,952 100.00

  14. Household divisionExample of a simple analysis generate byte DIVISION = HH_DIVIDE_NEXT > 1 generate l_HH_SIZE = ln(HH_SIZE)/ln(1.1) logit DIVISION HH_SIZE YEAR if HH_SIZE > 0 & NEXT_3 & HH_DIVIDE_NEXT >= 0 & first_in_hh logit DIVISION l_HH_SIZE YEAR if NEXT_3 & HH_DIVIDE_NEXT >= 0 & first_in_hh

  15. . logit DIVISION HH_SIZE YEAR if HH_SIZE > 0 & NEXT_3 & HH_DIVIDE_NEXT >= 0 & first_in_hh Iteration 0: log likelihood = -15419.716 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -14310.848 Iteration 2: log likelihood = -14127.244 Iteration 3: log likelihood = -14126.276 Iteration 4: log likelihood = -14126.276 Logistic regression Number of obs = 132688 LR chi2(2) = 2586.88 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 Log likelihood = -14126.276 Pseudo R2 = 0.0839 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DIVISION | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- HH_SIZE | .0882472 .0016549 53.32 0.000 .0850036 .0914908 YEAR | -.0122989 .0005941 -20.70 0.000 -.0134633 -.0111345 _cons | 18.23519 1.087218 16.77 0.000 16.10428 20.3661

  16. . logit DIVISION l_HH_SIZE YEAR if NEXT_3 & HH_DIVIDE_NEXT >= 0 & first_in_hh Iteration 0: log likelihood = -15419.716 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -13953.268 Iteration 2: log likelihood = -13468.077 Iteration 3: log likelihood = -13463.036 Iteration 4: log likelihood = -13463.032 Iteration 5: log likelihood = -13463.032 Logistic regression Number of obs = 132688 LR chi2(2) = 3913.37 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 Log likelihood = -13463.032 Pseudo R2 = 0.1269 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DIVISION | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- l_HH_SIZE | .1341566 .0023316 57.54 0.000 .1295867 .1387265 YEAR | -.0130866 .0005775 -22.66 0.000 -.0142185 -.0119547 _cons | 17.75924 1.048066 16.94 0.000 15.70507 19.81342 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  17. Creating household variables • bysort and egen are your friends • Use household_idto group observations of the same household in the same register • Let’s start with a count of the number of live individuals in the household bysort HOUSEHOLD_ID: egennew_hh_size = total(PRESENT) . corr HH_SIZE new_hh_size if YEAR >= 1789 (obs=1410354) | HH_SIZE new_hh~e -------------+------------------ HH_SIZE | 1.0000 new_hh_size | 1.0000 1.0000

  18. Creating measures of age and sex composition of the household bysort HOUSEHOLD_ID: egen males_1_15 = total(PRESENT & SEX == 2 & AGE_IN_SUI >= 1 & AGE_IN_SUI <= 15) bysort HOUSEHOLD_ID: egen males_16_55 = total(PRESENT & SEX == 2 & AGE_IN_SUI >= 16 & AGE_IN_SUI <= 55) bysort HOUSEHOLD_ID: egen males_56_up = total(PRESENT & SEX == 2 & AGE_IN_SUI >= 56) bysort HOUSEHOLD_ID: egen females_1_15 = total(PRESENT & SEX == 1 & AGE_IN_SUI >= 1 & AGE_IN_SUI <= 15) bysort HOUSEHOLD_ID: egen females_16_55 = total(PRESENT & SEX == 1 & AGE_IN_SUI >= 16 & AGE_IN_SUI <= 55) bysort HOUSEHOLD_ID: egen females_56_up = total(PRESENT & SEX == 1 & AGE_IN_SUI >= 56) generate hh_dependency_ratio = (males_1_15+males56_up+females_1_15+females56_up)/HH_SIZE bysort AGE_IN_SUI: generate first_in_age = _n == 1 bysort AGE_IN_SUI: egenmean_hh_dependency_ratio = mean(hh_dependency_ratio) twoway line mean_hh_dependency_ratio AGE_IN_SUI if first_in_age & AGE_IN_SUI >= 16 & AGE_IN_SUI <= 55, scheme(s1mono) ylabel(0(0.1)0.5) xlabel(16(5)55) ytitle("Household dependency ratio (Prop. < 15 or >= 56 sui)") xtitle("Age in sui")

  19. Numbers of individuals who co-reside with someone who holds a position . bysort HOUSEHOLD_ID: egenposition_in_hh = total(PRESENT & HAS_POSITION > 0) . tab position_in_hh if PRESENT & YEAR >= 1789 position_in | _hh | Freq. Percent Cum. ------------+----------------------------------- 0 | 1,177,575 90.23 90.23 1 | 87,517 6.71 96.94 2 | 24,204 1.85 98.79 3 | 8,019 0.61 99.41 4 | 4,893 0.37 99.78 5 | 1,712 0.13 99.91 6 | 651 0.05 99.96 7 | 241 0.02 99.98 8 | 136 0.01 99.99 9 | 101 0.01 100.00 ------------+----------------------------------- Total | 1,305,049 100.00 . replace position_in_hh = position_in_hh > 0 (49183 real changes made) . tab position_in_hh if PRESENT & YEAR >= 1789 position_in | _hh | Freq. Percent Cum. ------------+----------------------------------- 0 | 1,177,575 90.23 90.23 1 | 127,474 9.77 100.00 ------------+----------------------------------- Total | 1,305,049 100.00

  20. RELATIONSHIP • String describes relationship of individual to the head of the household • Before 1789, describes relationship to head of yihu • This is the basis of our kinship linkage • Automated linkage of children to their parents • Automated linkage of wives to their husband’s • All based on processing of strings describing relationship

  21. RELATIONSHIPCore • e is household head • wis a household head’s wife • m is household head’s mother • f is household head’s father (usually dead) • 1yb, 2yb, 2ob etc. are head’s brothers • Older brothers of the head are unusual • 1yz, 2yz, 2oz etc. are head’s unmarried sisters • 1s, 2s, etc. are head’s sons • 1d, 2d, etc. are the head’s unmarried daughters

  22. RELATIONSHIPCombining codes • More distant relationships are built up from these core relationships by combining them • Examples • ff is grandfather of head • fm is grandmother of head • f2yb is an uncle: father’s second younger brother • f2ybw is his wife • f2yb1s is a cousin: father’s 2nd younger brother’s 1st son • 3yb2s is a nephew: 3rd younger brother’s 2nd son • 3s2s is a grandson: 3rd son’s 2nd son • 3s2sw is his wife

  23. RELATIONSHIPLinking wives to husbands • Strip the w off of a married woman’s relationship and search the household for the remaining string. • f2yb1sw -> search for f2yb1s • Exceptions • For w, search for e • For f, search for m • For fm, search for ff • Etc. • Basically prepare a target string, and then make use of merge on HOUSEHOLD_ID and the target

  24. RELATIONSHIPLinking children to fathers • In most cases, strip off the last relationship code and look for the remainder. • 1s1s -> look for 1s • ff2yb3s2s -> look for ff2yb3s • Exceptions • e look for f • 2yb look for f • f2yb look for ff • To link married women to their fathers-in-law, strip off w first, then convert to father’s relationship

  25. RELATIONSHIPIndicators of specify basic relationships to head generate head = RELATIONSHIP == “e” generate head_wife = RELATIONSHIP == “w” generate mother = RELATIONSHIP == “m” generate father = RELATIONSHIP == “f” . tab head SEX if PRESENT & SEX >= 1, row col +-------------------+ | Key | |-------------------| | frequency | | row percentage | | column percentage | +-------------------+ | Sex head | Female Male | Total -----------+----------------------+---------- 0 | 539,935 671,972 | 1,211,907 | 44.55 55.45 | 100.00 | 98.69 78.90 | 86.64 -----------+----------------------+---------- 1 | 7,148 179,658 | 186,806 | 3.83 96.17 | 100.00 | 1.31 21.10 | 13.36 -----------+----------------------+---------- Total | 547,083 851,630 | 1,398,713 | 39.11 60.89 | 100.00 | 100.00 100.00 | 100.00

  26. RELATIONSHIPProcessing for distant relationships • Strip out numbers, seniority modifiers y and b, etc. • In a .do file, this will create a new variable with a stripped relationship generate new_RELATIONSHIP = RELATIONSHIP local for_removal "1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 o y w" foreach x of local for_removal { replace new_RELATIONSHIP = subinstr(new_RELATIONSHIP,"`x'","",.) }

  27. Examples

  28. generate brother = new_RELATIONSHIP = “b” & SEX == 2 generate brothers_wife = “b” & SEX == 1 & MARITAL_STATUS !=2 & MARITAL_STATUS > 0 generate sister = new_RELATIONSHIP = “z” & SEX == 1 generate male_cousin = new_RELATIONSHIP = “fbs” & SEX == 2 generate nephew = new_RELATIONSHIP = “bs” & SEX == 2

  29. Proportions of different relationships by age generate brother = new_RELATIONSHIP == "b" bysort AGE_IN_SUI: egen males = total(SEX == 2 & PRESENT) bysort AGE_IN_SUI: egen brothers = total(SEX == 2 & brother & PRESENT) generate proportion_brothers = brothers/males by AGE_IN_SUI: generate first_in_age = _n == 1 twoway line proportion_brothers AGE_IN_SUI if AGE_IN_SUI >= 1 & AGE_IN_SUI <= 80 & first_in_age, ytitle("Proportion of males who are brother of a head") scheme(s1mono) bysort AGE_IN_SUI: egen heads = total(SEX == 2 & RELATIONSHIP == "e" & PRESENT) generate proportion_heads = heads/males twoway line proportion_heads AGE_IN_SUI if AGE_IN_SUI >= 1 & AGE_IN_SUI <= 80 & first_in_age, ytitle("Proportion of males who are household head") scheme(s1mono) bysort AGE_IN_SUI: egen sons = total(SEX == 2 & new_RELATIONSHIP == "s" & PRESENT) generate proportion_sons = sons/males twoway line proportion_sons AGE_IN_SUI if AGE_IN_SUI >= 1 & AGE_IN_SUI <= 80 & first_in_age, ytitle("Proportion of males who are son of a head") scheme(s1mono)

  30. Relationship at first appearance bysort PERSON_ID (YEAR): generate fa_nephew = new_RELATIONSHIP[1] == "bs" & AGE[1] <= 10 & SEX == 2 & PRESENT bysort PERSON_ID (YEAR): generate fa_son = new_RELATIONSHIP[1] == "s" & AGE[1] <= 10 & SEX == 2 & PRESENT generate fa_nephew_head = fa_nephew & head generate fa_son_head = fa_son & head bysort AGE_IN_SUI: egenfa_sons = total(fa_son) bysort AGE_IN_SUI: egenfa_nephews = total(fa_nephew) bysort AGE_IN_SUI: egenfa_sons_head = total(fa_son_head) bysort AGE_IN_SUI: egenfa_nephews_head = total(fa_nephew_head) generate p_fa_sons_head = fa_sons_head/fa_sons generate p_fa_nephews_head = fa_nephews_head/fa_nephews twoway line p_fa_sons_headp_fa_nephews_head AGE_IN_SUI if AGE_IN_SUI >= 1 & AGE_IN_SUI <= 80 & first_in_age, ytitle("Proportion") scheme(s1mono) twoway line p_fa_sons_headp_fa_nephews_head AGE_IN_SUI if AGE_IN_SUI >= 1 & AGE_IN_SUI <= 80 & first_in_age, ytitle("Proportion now head") scheme(s1mono) legend(order(1 "Appeared as sons of head" 2 "Appeared as nephews of head"))

More Related