1 / 15

FRED: Discourses on Peer Group Assessment as Inclusive Practice

FRED: Discourses on Peer Group Assessment as Inclusive Practice. An interactive seminar on SpLD ’ s and assessment in collaboration with AchieveAbility 2007-201. Overview. The purpose of this discussion Introducing the NTF project Key NTF findings Meaningful learning for SpLDs

titus
Download Presentation

FRED: Discourses on Peer Group Assessment as Inclusive Practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FRED: Discourses on Peer Group Assessment as Inclusive Practice An interactive seminar on SpLD’s and assessment in collaboration with AchieveAbility 2007-201

  2. Overview • The purpose of this discussion • Introducing the NTF project • Key NTF findings • Meaningful learning for SpLDs • Technology and visual thinking • Active Peer Assessment discourses

  3. Discussion • The notion that the student thinking experience can be enhanced by active peer assessment and technology. • Negotiated between students • To produce meaningful knowledge bridging the learning and activity

  4. NTF InCurriculum InCurriculum ~ National Teaching Fellowship Project ~ 3 years Participating institutions -10 staff Lead :Norwich University College of the Arts University of Westminster (London) De Montford University (Midlands) 400 students from UG courses

  5. NTF- Aims • Transfer practice from Arts based courses www.incurriculum.org.uk • To modify 3 modules at each institution, deliver & evaluate • Dissemination of inclusive practice in course delivery & assessment Student negotiation- underpinned the approach to changing practice

  6. Student negotiated learning Changing practice for different learning Retention of students Student attainment Cost effective education- student centred • Active -Independent learners • Critical thinkers • Contextualised learning

  7. Findings: • Student ownership of assessment methods • Student as the producer and the expert • Students to be strategic in planning learning • Reconnect with the student experience • Use of technology for active learning • Use of visual and discourse as assessment • Peer student feedback for formative assessment • Learning spaces for reflection

  8. Discursive learning for SpLDs Think Tank meetings: • Summative Peer assessment • Student lead discussion groups • Focus on learning strategies and behaviours • Emphasise diversity of approaches • Share good practice - externalise learning • Develop reflective practice - deep learning • Capture/articulate student voice

  9. Visual learning for SpLDs • Use of technology for student centred approach to learning: student peer assessment: • - MP3 • -Camtasia • -Mobile communications • -Web sites • -Prezi – For the holistic view

  10. Technology and outcomes • Reconfirm learning styles approach on the VLE • Use MP3 for group discussion – peer assessment- formative and summative Use of mobile / video for critiques • Virtual marking and MP3 for reconfirmation and reflection

  11. SpLD Visual thinking • Multi dimensional thinking • Thinking point • Mapping of reference points • Limitless flow • Convergence of thinking points • Change of flow- fast- adaptable- flexible

  12. Analogy

  13. FRED discourses • How can Peer Assessment be delivered for meaningful learning? • How can learning style (SpLD) be linked to peer assessment activity ? • What is the criteria for assessment?: Clarity of thought- Problem solving- Focus on the subject

  14. The inclusive practice Active Peer Group work: • Consider and establish criteria • Peer assessment activity delivered in the context of learning style • Feedback on knowledge given

  15. Theories Humanist, Experiential, Social Constructivism : student centred, learner actions create the learning situation, engaging existing knowledge, learning from each other, non-linear process.

More Related